This would be sick if you predicted it before the last season claiming he had long vax.
that’s equivalent to what I did with Chokervic. Pure genius.
The experts were saying it on national television long ago. And their prediction came true. You were left weeping at center court of Paris when your prediction was proven completely wrong. Cope and seethe with your stupid clinging to a stupid argument.
So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?
Chris Collinsworth, a former professional player, who switched to commentating winning 17 Emmy’s for his incredible career in broadcasting, making an impartial assessment of a players ability solely based on performance as seen. And eventually proven correct because of the facts at hand and that players inability to turn it around and get only worse through the season and losing the biggest game of the year in a particularly terrible performance.
Or.
Anonymous message board poster with no credentials claiming a prediction made only AFTER a single loss, based solely on partisan reasons completely unrelated to the sport. That prediction was obviously proven wrong as the player went on and won the most important title of his career on the biggest stage in the world nearly a year after your heroic triumphant prediction.
Geee, I wonder. I really do.
Have you had a chance to peruse Kecle’s stats and have a reason for his falling off a cliff?
The experts were saying it on national television long ago. And their prediction came true. You were left weeping at center court of Paris when your prediction was proven completely wrong. Cope and seethe with your stupid clinging to a stupid argument.
So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?
He supposedly, though never provided proof, that his prediction came in early 2024. So before the Olympic win, not after. Your timeline is confused.
But yes. I would say actual experts making not partisan factual judgements as part of their job should hold more weight that a random person throwing out random unsubstantiated comments. That seems like a no brained though. Especially since the expert said Kelce was sliding to start the 2024 season and he continued to then stunk in the Super Bowl. The other side made a prediction and the person went on to win Olympic gold. Take those predictions for what they’re worth. Cheers.
Kudos to Dr Pierre Kory for telling the truth. The medical establishment will not admit wrongdoing because it will harm their reputation and cash flow. So it becomes a game of dragging along, subtly changing definitions/criteria/moving goalposts, bringing forth new "information" in hopes that the gullible mass populace will quickly forget that it contradicts what they were previously told. Time to wake up.
So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?
He supposedly, though never provided proof, that his prediction came in early 2024. So before the Olympic win, not after. Your timeline is confused.
How does that timeline conflict with what I posted?
The experts were saying it on national television long ago. And their prediction came true. You were left weeping at center court of Paris when your prediction was proven completely wrong. Cope and seethe with your stupid clinging to a stupid argument.
So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?
To be clear Chokervic has struggled since late 2023. The Olympics was a blip in otherwise terrible play that I predicted after my diagnosis.
Chris Collinsworth, a former professional player, who switched to commentating winning 17 Emmy’s for his incredible career in broadcasting, making an impartial assessment of a players ability solely based on performance as seen. And eventually proven correct because of the facts at hand and that players inability to turn it around and get only worse through the season and losing the biggest game of the year in a particularly terrible performance.
Or.
Anonymous message board poster with no credentials claiming a prediction made only AFTER a single loss, based solely on partisan reasons completely unrelated to the sport. That prediction was obviously proven wrong as the player went on and won the most important title of his career on the biggest stage in the world nearly a year after your heroic triumphant prediction.
Geee, I wonder. I really do.
Have you had a chance to peruse Kecle’s stats and have a reason for his falling off a cliff?
This is barely coherent. But i agree. Posters on here making claims after a single loss would need additional evidence.
Posters who make claims after a loss and then see 18 months of vindication with only a single tournament victory. Wow. That’s a great call.
Chris Collinsworth, a former professional player, who switched to commentating winning 17 Emmy’s for his incredible career in broadcasting, making an impartial assessment of a players ability solely based on performance as seen. And eventually proven correct because of the facts at hand and that players inability to turn it around and get only worse through the season and losing the biggest game of the year in a particularly terrible performance.
Or.
Anonymous message board poster with no credentials claiming a prediction made only AFTER a single loss, based solely on partisan reasons completely unrelated to the sport. That prediction was obviously proven wrong as the player went on and won the most important title of his career on the biggest stage in the world nearly a year after your heroic triumphant prediction.
Geee, I wonder. I really do.
Have you had a chance to peruse Kecle’s stats and have a reason for his falling off a cliff?
This is barely coherent. But i agree. Posters on here making claims after a single loss would need additional evidence.
Posters who make claims after a loss and then see 18 months of vindication with only a single tournament victory. Wow. That’s a great call.
I understand that it’s not coherent to you. It’s simple and straightforward. Outside of your wheelhouse.
But its nice to hear you’re in agreement then that Kelces two straight years of atrocious performance culminating in one of his worst games at the biggest stage is proof that something is amiss. And one can only assume it lines up with his sponsorship choices. We all can’t continue to reach grand slam finals on our way to win Olympic golds. Someone’s got to be the loser. Sorry kiddo.
The experts were saying it on national television long ago. And their prediction came true. You were left weeping at center court of Paris when your prediction was proven completely wrong. Cope and seethe with your stupid clinging to a stupid argument.
So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?
“Winning the Olympics and struggling since”
His entire claim is that 9 months before the Olympics he claimed Novak was toast from long covid and would never win again.
That is the exact opposite of what you posted. Can I clear it up further?
So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?
“Winning the Olympics and struggling since”
His entire claim is that 9 months before the Olympics he claimed Novak was toast from long covid and would never win again.
That is the exact opposite of what you posted. Can I clear it up further?
Djokovic won the Olympics and struggled since. Kelce won the Super Bowl and struggled in this year's Super Bowl. Both of those are factual statements. When Harambe made his claim was not part of the timelines I posted, so how could it be "the opposite" of what I posted?
His entire claim is that 9 months before the Olympics he claimed Novak was toast from long covid and would never win again.
That is the exact opposite of what you posted. Can I clear it up further?
Djokovic won the Olympics and struggled since. Kelce won the Super Bowl and struggled in this year's Super Bowl. Both of those are factual statements. When Harambe made his claim was not part of the timelines I posted, so how could it be "the opposite" of what I posted?
Kelce won the superbowl in the 23-24 season. Collinsworth said that line three games into the 24-25 season and continued his slide down and hit rock bottom at the Super Bowl.
Novak had a great 2023 campaign. A prediction was made, allegedly though never shown, in early 2024. Novak went on to win Olympic gold nine months later.
You really don’t see a difference in those two things?
I mean you also literally wrote “winning the Olympics and struggling since”. His whole stupid shtick is making the proclamation long ahead of the Olympics. I am truly hung up on what you’re failing to understand regarding that timeline. It’s from January 24 to the Olympics. And you’re talking about since the Olympics. Where is the disconnect?
Per ESPN's Tim MacMahon, the NBA announced Tuesday that it had fined Porzingis $50,000 for breaking protocol. MacMahon noted that the fully vaccinated Porzingis "briefly visited" a Los Angeles strip club on Sunday night amid Dallas' first-round playoff series against the Los Angeles Clippers.
Lol after we disproved "died suddenly" DanM has moved onto people just getting sick. Top minds at work.
“The Celtics are really taking it day-by-day with Kristaps Porzingis and this viral illness that he has,” Charania said ahead of Wednesday’s game. “They don’t quite know when he’s going to return. And honestly, they don’t quite know what exactly has led to this viral illness.
Currently we are teaching posters to understand how time works. For example a poster wrote the following:
“So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?”
So we’re trying to spell out for the poor fella that an expert making a prediction well ahead of said players collapse and loss at the biggest stage is different than someone predicting an athletes inevitable downfall who then goes on to the biggest win of his career. It’s not glamorous work but someone has to help out the folks.
So in this instance with this persons stance, it’s easy to say unequivocally that YES! The poster who made the prediction is wrong. Horribly wrong in fact. Nine months before the Olympics we were guaranteed Novak was done for. Never to win again. He then, and this is where time lessons comes in, 9 months later gold is presented at center court. That is the very definition of someone being completely wrong. Absolutely devastatingly wrong. Hope that answers your question for ya.
Next week we’re going to learn how to change for a dollar. Exciting stuff around here.
This is barely coherent. But i agree. Posters on here making claims after a single loss would need additional evidence.
Posters who make claims after a loss and then see 18 months of vindication with only a single tournament victory. Wow. That’s a great call.
I understand that it’s not coherent to you. It’s simple and straightforward. Outside of your wheelhouse.
But it’s nice to hear you’re in agreement then that Kelces two straight years of atrocious performance culminating in one of his worst games at the biggest stage is proof that something is amiss. And one can only assume it lines up with his sponsorship choices. We all can’t continue to reach grand slam finals on our way to win Olympic golds. Someone’s got to be the loser. Sorry kiddo.
If you could link to a post predicting Kelces decline two years ago, you’d be worthy of Harambe status.
Instead you’re forced to wear an iron collar the reads “post hoc” for all to see. Embarrassing!
Currently we are teaching posters to understand how time works. For example a poster wrote the following:
“So Kelce winning a Super Bowl last year but losing in the Super Bowl this year makes the experts on TV right about him but Djokovic winning the Olympics last year and struggling since makes Harambe completely wrong?”
So we’re trying to spell out for the poor fella that an expert making a prediction well ahead of said players collapse and loss at the biggest stage is different than someone predicting an athletes inevitable downfall who then goes on to the biggest win of his career. It’s not glamorous work but someone has to help out the folks.
So in this instance with this persons stance, it’s easy to say unequivocally that YES! The poster who made the prediction is wrong. Horribly wrong in fact. Nine months before the Olympics we were guaranteed Novak was done for. Never to win again. He then, and this is where time lessons comes in, 9 months later gold is presented at center court. That is the very definition of someone being completely wrong. Absolutely devastatingly wrong. Hope that answers your question for ya.
Next week we’re going to learn how to change for a dollar. Exciting stuff around here.
Post hoc. Enuf said.
Have the smarts to predict something before it happens. Otherwise you’re just a pattern matching ape.
