-
64
-
downvote farmer wrote:
The W's just don't stop comin'.
Real men of genius these people.
04 -
Video of abandoned Bud Light stand at Fenway Park.
14 -
14
-
wakey wakey wrote:
Has AB filled for bankruptcy yet? Cway Twavis told me it was imminent.
How about now?
22 -
translucent wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
A trans person in closet has the gender identity opposite to their natal sex. But they don't have the gender role or the gender expression that match their gender identity. They are hiding their identity from the public by not aligning their gender role or gender expression with their identity.
A transvestite has the gender expression that is opposite to their natal sex, but their gender identity is the same as their natal sex. This person is not a transgender.
A transgender woman and a male identifying transvestite.
FYI, no one in the trans community really says "transvestite" anymore. Even "crossdresser" is dying off. Younger people who might have identified with that had they been born in past generations are more likely to think of themselves as non-binary, genderfluid, femboys (seems like this is the term that's winning for "tomboy, but in the other direction"), or, for the ones who actually are trans women, realizing this sooner.
I think it's an improvement.
That’s because the freaks on the left need to constantly change their terminology to keep their opponents guessing at what they mean.
As soon as a common and accepted vernacular can be established, the left knows their stance is untenable.
Transvesite, cross dresser, transsexual, it’s all the same word for the mentally ill (and often times violent)75 -
think of how strong Starbucks' backbone has to be to fire that person knowing the backlash that is coming from the wokesters.
the tide is turning.
64 -
gottagofast wrote:
think of how strong Starbucks' backbone has to be to fire that person knowing the backlash that is coming from the wokesters.
the tide is turning.
What tide? Nothing will stop people from making personal choices no matter how many corporations you boycott and put people out of jobs. You bellends will sacrifice anything to promote some evangelical crap no matter how many it hurts.
85 -
here's the thing right wingers.
don't ever whine about cancel culture again.
because this is cancel culture. This is it. This is all it is.
Bud light handed a can of beer to a trans woman and you boycotted and canceled bud light.
You are free to do it.
Just remember that you do it too.
1110 -
oncearunnerrrrrr wrote:
here's the thing right wingers.
don't ever whine about cancel culture again.
because this is cancel culture. This is it. This is all it is.
Bud light handed a can of beer to a trans woman and you boycotted and canceled bud light.
You are free to do it.
Just remember that you do it too.
you don't know what cancel culture is.
these are bud light customers choosing to spend their money elsewhere.
cancel culture is trying to get joe rogen kicked off spotify when you don't even listen to joe rogan and probably aren't even a spotify subscriber.
136 -
People who are boycotting Bud Light are so gay... not that there is anything wrong with that. ;)
26 -
You have a very good company...
24 -
Yawn^50 wrote:
translucent wrote:
FYI, no one in the trans community really says "transvestite" anymore. Even "crossdresser" is dying off. Younger people who might have identified with that had they been born in past generations are more likely to think of themselves as non-binary, genderfluid, femboys (seems like this is the term that's winning for "tomboy, but in the other direction"), or, for the ones who actually are trans women, realizing this sooner.
I think it's an improvement.
That’s because the freaks on the left need to constantly change their terminology to keep their opponents guessing at what they mean.
As soon as a common and accepted vernacular can be established, the left knows their stance is untenable.
Transvesite, cross dresser, transsexual, it’s all the same word for the mentally ill (and often times violent)Nope. The terms are an expression of a generational shift in how transgender people relate to their experiences -- no longer something they try to bury in the corner of a closet or furtively live out on nights and weekends, until the pain and disconnect of gender dysphoria grows too great -- but an integrated and essential part of who they are.
"Freak on the left". I like that. I'll put it next to the times I've been called a Nazi, and a member of "The Synagogue of Satan".
47 -
translucent wrote:
Yawn^50 wrote:
That’s because the freaks on the left need to constantly change their terminology to keep their opponents guessing at what they mean.
As soon as a common and accepted vernacular can be established, the left knows their stance is untenable.
Transvesite, cross dresser, transsexual, it’s all the same word for the mentally ill (and often times violent)Nope. The terms are an expression of a generational shift in how transgender people relate to their experiences -- no longer something they try to bury in the corner of a closet or furtively live out on nights and weekends, until the pain and disconnect of gender dysphoria grows too great -- but an integrated and essential part of who they are.
"Freak on the left". I like that. I'll put it next to the times I've been called a Nazi, and a member of "The Synagogue of Satan".
If the boot fits.
it’s the same reason the left can’t define a woman anymore. By remaining ambiguous they think that they can keep calling others ignorant for not understanding their constantly shifting vocabulary.
95 -
Yawn^50 wrote:
translucent wrote:
FYI, no one in the trans community really says "transvestite" anymore. Even "crossdresser" is dying off. Younger people who might have identified with that had they been born in past generations are more likely to think of themselves as non-binary, genderfluid, femboys (seems like this is the term that's winning for "tomboy, but in the other direction"), or, for the ones who actually are trans women, realizing this sooner.
I think it's an improvement.
That’s because the freaks on the left need to constantly change their terminology to keep their opponents guessing at what they mean.
As soon as a common and accepted vernacular can be established, the left knows their stance is untenable.
Transvesite, cross dresser, transsexual, it’s all the same word for the mentally ill (and often times violent)Never left enough for left wing loonies. LoL. The idiocy of pronouns perfectly demonstrated.
34 -
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
You have a very good company...
Never left enough for the fluid ideologies of left wing loonies. LOL.
The only Bud Light drinks left must be off the grid.
24 -
gottagofast wrote:
oncearunnerrrrrr wrote:
here's the thing right wingers.
don't ever whine about cancel culture again.
because this is cancel culture. This is it. This is all it is.
Bud light handed a can of beer to a trans woman and you boycotted and canceled bud light.
You are free to do it.
Just remember that you do it too.
you don't know what cancel culture is.
these are bud light customers choosing to spend their money elsewhere.
cancel culture is trying to get joe rogen kicked off spotify when you don't even listen to joe rogan and probably aren't even a spotify subscriber.
LOL oh is THAT the dictionary definition? Look up "splitting hairs" and get back to me.
Many liberals loved Dave Chappelle and many stopped watching him on Netflix when he made jokes they didn't like.
Many liberals loved R-Kelly, Michael Jackson, and other artists, before they were "cancelled".
Conservatives don't really watch SNL, but they still called for Pete Davidson's head on a spike when he said that Dan Crenshaw lost his eye in "war or whatever."
This bud light debacle IS cancel culture at it's finest. People were so triggered by seeing a trans person that they are now refusing to drink Bud Light (which is fine by me personally the beer tastes awful). But that's the thing that made them stop. Freaking out over seeing a trans person on the can.
Get a grip.
77 -
nah. only point you scored with that rant was pete davidson. that was cancel culture.
cancel culture is contacting advertisers and employers to suppress views you don't like.
in this case AB is the advertiser. this is just AB's own customers choosing to spend money somewhere else because AB offended them by calling them out of touch and fratty. AB can have those views all they want while being broke.
83 -
oncearunnerrrrrr wrote:
gottagofast wrote:
you don't know what cancel culture is.
these are bud light customers choosing to spend their money elsewhere.
cancel culture is trying to get joe rogen kicked off spotify when you don't even listen to joe rogan and probably aren't even a spotify subscriber.
LOL oh is THAT the dictionary definition? Look up "splitting hairs" and get back to me.
Many liberals loved Dave Chappelle and many stopped watching him on Netflix when he made jokes they didn't like.
Many liberals loved R-Kelly, Michael Jackson, and other artists, before they were "cancelled".
Conservatives don't really watch SNL, but they still called for Pete Davidson's head on a spike when he said that Dan Crenshaw lost his eye in "war or whatever."
This bud light debacle IS cancel culture at it's finest. People were so triggered by seeing a trans person that they are now refusing to drink Bud Light (which is fine by me personally the beer tastes awful). But that's the thing that made them stop. Freaking out over seeing a trans person on the can.
Get a grip.
Some people don't like to see mental illness glorified. Obviously others just have lower moral standards, though...
56 -
BUD has gotten crushed. What happened to the dude (they?) who tried to dismiss the acute sell off in BUD as merely a one to two day phenomenon. Oops.
Think I may actually get some Bud Light and just enjoy this $hitshow now.
02
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.