Moderator – delete my last post if you’d like, but I do believe the brothers would benefit from having data on which moderator deletes which posts and threads. If you find that offensive, I’m not sure what to say.
the brothers would benefit from having data on which moderator deletes which posts and threads. If you find that offensive, I’m not sure what to say.
The norm on most forums and social media is that the users know at least who the mods are, if not which one deleted what. This doesn't mean the mods are doxxed. Just the user handles they post under. If user "ihateallposts" is a mod, then "ihateallposts" appears on a list of mods.
And certainly the admins or owners generally have a clear activity record on most sites.
Moderator – delete my last post if you’d like, but I do believe the brothers would benefit from having data on which moderator deletes which posts and threads. If you find that offensive, I’m not sure what to say.
This is getting out of control. Get Rojo on the horn. We need these stats.
A chance to save womens lives is immediately deleted. Horribly sad. But bashing Kara Goucher endlessly is okay.
The first phase in correcting a problem is to identify it. Identifying a group that needs attention from Safesport should not be deleted. Any poster has the right to defend this group but when their behaviors are unable to be defended they simply delete the post. That is in no way helping the victims.
Moderator – delete my last post if you’d like, but I do believe the brothers would benefit from having data on which moderator deletes which posts and threads. If you find that offensive, I’m not sure what to say.
Moderator – delete my last post if you’d like, but I do believe the brothers would benefit from having data on which moderator deletes which posts and threads. If you find that offensive, I’m not sure what to say.
An unmoderated section of the MB would be amusing. A link to click (*Warning, Free Speech) to keep the snowflakes away - lol, but no chance they could fight their own curiosity. Yes, eliminate obvious spam and porn, but otherwise let 'er rip.
An unmoderated section of the MB would be amusing. A link to click (*Warning, Free Speech) to keep the snowflakes away - lol, but no chance they could fight their own curiosity. Yes, eliminate obvious spam and porn, but otherwise let 'er rip.
Look at those downvotes. Libs genuinely hate free speech. Why? Because they know that censorship is key to protecting their narratives.
I think that is exactly what they want. Because I started a thread asking the brothers to reconsider the moderation.
Then I guess it's time to move on. Enjoy truth social, seems more up your alley anyway
When it comes right down to it, who actually wants me to leave? The brothers couldn’t care less. At most there are a couple of moderators who really want me gone. Frankly it might be fewer than a couple. Other than that, I doubt anyone cares. So if that is the case, why should I leave because of 1-2 people?
No, I enjoy it here. There are still fun and interesting things about the message board, even if it is grossly over moderated.
Dear moderator: stop deleting posts on this thread willy nilly. You are violating Rojo’s ruling, allowing this thread as a place specifically to discuss moderation. We get it - you don’t like criticism of moderation. Tough beans. You can’t get around Rojo’s ruling by simply deleting every other post.
Unless a post includes porn, physical threats, doxxing, or is a bot, humbly request that you back off.