The voices of rape victims all too-often go unheard. According to Kathleen DeZeeuw, "I, having lived through rape, and also having raised a child conceived in rape, feel personally assaulted and insulted every time I hear that abortion should be legal because of rape and incest. I feel that we're being used by pro-abortionists to further the abortion issue, even though we've not been asked to tell our side."
So you put an article featuring the opinion of one person against centuries of slavery and Jim Crow in the US. A little disproportionate, you'd think. But that's how you think.
I’m not saying a political decision is a bad thing. All I’m saying is that people who think this decision was made because it’s morally right reveal themselves as completely hoodwinked by propaganda from powerful political players. Anyone who fails to recognize this is basically admitting they’re just a pawn for monied interests, which, hey, be my guest. I personally think it’s a little “uncool” to openly brag that you are dull enough to froth about whatever the talking heads on [political news source] have chosen for you daily. But yeah, land of the free, go ahead.
To these types of "arguments," all I can say is: Cry harder.
These kind of reactionary “victories” backfire 90% of the time in Western democracies. Low information types such as yourself seem content being pawns in the oligarchic political apparatus. I applaud you for accepting your station in life.
You're such a try-hard. You think random articles like that can match your centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and the rest - Derek Chauvin and so on. At least it establishes your opinions on anything else are as myopic and ignorant.
That's an amusing reply. Why? Because it does not in any way address the point I made. Here, I'll type this slowly to help your reading comprehension efforts.
Draconian abortion laws impose the will of others upon women. Those "others" are largely conservatives, imposing their will upon women. Thus the irony of you typing "Liberals will always try to impose their will" in relation to this topic.
Do I need to spell it out any more for you?
Well this entire thread is related to the reversal of Liberal supreme court judges imposing their will on the nation. If you'd just like to stick the last few sentences because it's easier, that's fine.
Pro lifers know that we have to accept draconian Liberal abortion laws when they're passed legitimately. In that case our task is to persuade others if possible.
Roe vs. Wade was illegitimate and everyone knows it. Everyone on both sides knew it wouldn't last.
The State wasn’t forcing anyone to get an abortion. Why are you wanting to impose your personal restrictions on choice of medical procedures available to others?
If I am morally opposed to blood transfusions because I’m a Jehovah’s Witness, it’s not right for me to have the State ban them for everyone.
You're such a try-hard. You think random articles like that can match your centuries of slavery, Jim Crow, lynchings and the rest - Derek Chauvin and so on. At least it establishes your opinions on anything else are as myopic and ignorant.
Asians too? Oppressing blacks not enough for you racist colonialist in squalid NZ?
Nonpartisan nonsexist facts: The only reason this video catches and holds anyone’s attention, notwithstanding the fact that there’s nothing new or insightful in what she’s ranting about, is because it’s an attractive woman talking.
That speaks volumes. Your body, your thoughts, your needs are meaningless to these "prolifers". Its so easy to force SOMEONE ELSE to carry an unwanted pregnancy, it no problem for OTHERS to tell that woman what she must do. Those telling her have no burden, no cost, it all on the woman. And they don'y even give a damn about her feelings or her situation. All that matters is what they think is right.
Killing innocent people is wrong no matter what your feelings are.
No one’s getting killed.
Or do you think that half of all potential people die when the zygote doesn’t attach and gets ejected from the uterus?
I accounted for your response in that post. "It's rare so it's fine for rape victims to be forced to carry the baby." I've been very honest with what I believe. I'm just pointing out the worst parts of the decision so that others can see. You believe rape victims should have to carry their rapist's (there you go) baby to term. You do believe that, right? Why don't you be honest now.
I previously said I would be supportive in instances of rape but I'm going back on that. While I'm sympathetic to the horrible situation any victim of rape is in, that still would not justify taking an innocent life. You can call me a horrible person for saying that, I don't really care about your opinion.
I appreciate you being logically consistent.
Do you agree that if I need your kidney to live, as you are the only match for me, that the State should force you to give it to me?
So many males here ready to tell women what their rights are. If you didn't know it was America you'd think you were hearing from the Taliban or even ISIS.
Since you didn’t address my claim it is clear you cannot address it.
What you say on anything is irrelevant drivel. Does that address it?
