- Apparently, the supposed QPQ of Biden makes the explicit QPQ of Trump OK. Damn, if they could only remember what their mothers told them about multiple wrongs!
- Options regarding the supposed Biden QPQ:
A) It's total BS (which it is). Or,
B) The Rs in the House are too incompetent to impeach a CLEARLY guilty president.
C) A and B (if A were true).
[Answer: C]
What do you mean supposed? He openly bragged about it.
This is true. Libs need to get their facts straight.
Despite a Senate GOP investigation that found no wrongdoing by Joe Biden on foreign policy in Ukraine,\u00a0claims to the contrary\u00a0continue to circulate.
In a year, if the crazy thing happens and Trump is elected, it indeed will be a sad day for all of America and democracy.
Some might be happy initially, but some years down the line they will be denying to their kids and grandkids that they actually voted for the conman. It will be hard for them to explain that they didn't notice all the signs that he was conning them.
Were you asleep for the 1st 2 years of the Biden admin? Censorship, lockdowns, mandates of a vaccine not properly tested, proxy war with Russia, massive inflation, illegal immigration run amok, genocide in Gaza, significant increase in homelessness, blew up the Nordstream pipeline -- a massive ecological disaster, Justice Dept going after leading GOP contender for the presidency, labeling Catholics and parents terrorists , FBI fake kidnap plot of Michigan Dem governor, ect.
Worst admin of my lifetime for sure. And most have been terrible
What do you mean supposed? He openly bragged about it.
Yes, and I'm certain that you can provide at least a Tweet and a YouTube video proving it.
And slightly more substantively (and stupidly futilely):
1) Our government encourages other governments to worry about corruption in their countries all of the time. Increasingly hypocritically, arguably, but clearly not wrong.
2) A president shouldn't threaten to withhold military aid unless a country investigates his political rivals. For all intents and purposes, this is very, very similar to, "Presidents shouldn't shoot anyone on 5th Avenue."
- Apparently, the supposed QPQ of Biden makes the explicit QPQ of Trump OK. Damn, if they could only remember what their mothers told them about multiple wrongs!
- Options regarding the supposed Biden QPQ:
A) It's total BS (which it is). Or,
B) The Rs in the House are too incompetent to impeach a CLEARLY guilty president.
C) A and B (if A were true).
[Answer: C]
What do you mean supposed? He openly bragged about it.
"...well, sonofabitch, he got fired..."- Joe Biden
New Episodes Every Friday!Audio + More at https://linktr.ee/BreuniverseWatch Jim Breuer's comedy special 'Somebody Had to Say It’ is available now exclusivel...
And slightly more substantively (and stupidly futilely):
1) Our government encourages other governments to worry about corruption in their countries all of the time. Increasingly hypocritically, arguably, but clearly not wrong.
2) A president shouldn't threaten to withhold military aid unless a country investigates his political rivals. For all intents and purposes, this is very, very similar to, "Presidents shouldn't shoot anyone on 5th Avenue."
So now you acknowledge the quid pro quo, but are trying to rationalize it. You don’t feel that foreign governments attempts to influence American political figures is worthy of investigation? What were the years of obsession over the Steele dossier about, then?
Sleepy Joe isn't doing any debates in 2024. He's no longer capable. He will drop out of the race long before the debate are conducted.
I assure you that Trump's team is the team that won't want to debate. Biden will be ready to go. Trump won't back down though. We will get debates this year and I'm stoked
Trump doesn't know how to debate. Debating Trump would be like debating angry drunk uncle. Drunk uncle would not respond to any points, wouldn't take turns but just would go off on angry abusive tirades.
And slightly more substantively (and stupidly futilely):
1) Our government encourages other governments to worry about corruption in their countries all of the time. Increasingly hypocritically, arguably, but clearly not wrong.
2) A president shouldn't threaten to withhold military aid unless a country investigates his political rivals. For all intents and purposes, this is very, very similar to, "Presidents shouldn't shoot anyone on 5th Avenue."
So now you acknowledge the quid pro quo, but are trying to rationalize it. You don’t feel that foreign governments attempts to influence American political figures is worthy of investigation? What were the years of obsession over the Steele dossier about, then?
trump was literally trying to force the Ukrainian government to influence American political figures by announcing a fraudulent investigation of the Bidens. Trump was trying to get Ukraine to do that...you are correct to be against that. Kudos. You are arguing the first impeachment was correct to hold Trump to account for doing that.
I assure you that Trump's team is the team that won't want to debate. Biden will be ready to go. Trump won't back down though. We will get debates this year and I'm stoked
Trump doesn't know how to debate. Debating Trump would be like debating angry drunk uncle. Drunk uncle would not respond to any points, wouldn't take turns but just would go off on angry abusive tirades.
That's not debating
Sleepy Joe has trouble speaking, period. He will not do any debates in 2024.
Damn, that's it. You've convinced me to go for the filthy autocrat.
Job well done. Credit where credit is due. Other biblical compliments that El Runkin might add.
BTW, El Runkin, I picture you living in a strict Evangelical community somewhere in highly Christian-tolerant North Africa. Apologies for possibly getting too intrusive, but is that about right?
You're a fish and I'm a water sign. This is all a motor booty affair, as far as I'm concerned.
So now you acknowledge the quid pro quo, but are trying to rationalize it. You don’t feel that foreign governments attempts to influence American political figures is worthy of investigation? What were the years of obsession over the Steele dossier about, then?
trump was literally trying to force the Ukrainian government to influence American political figures by announcing a fraudulent investigation of the Bidens. Trump was trying to get Ukraine to do that...you are correct to be against that. Kudos. You are arguing the first impeachment was correct to hold Trump to account for doing that.
Common ground!
Why do you say it was fraudulent? Congress is running its own investigation regarding the relationship between the Bidens and Ukraine (as well as other countries) as we speak. I think it's pretty obvious at this point that Trump wanted Ukraine to actually investigate Biden.
The lie that won't die. No use explaining it again and again. You heard it but you will not process it and remember it.
Nope. You are a Bidenette cultist. It was either fire the state prosecutor before Biden was to fly out of Kiev in 6 hours or no $1B loan for Ukraine.
Biden's quid pro quo obviously worked. The prosecutor was fired (to Joe's delight) and the loan was sent. Biden was bragging all about it in the video.
In a year, if the crazy thing happens and Trump is elected, it indeed will be a sad day for all of America and democracy.
Some might be happy initially, but some years down the line they will be denying to their kids and grandkids that they actually voted for the conman. It will be hard for them to explain that they didn't notice all the signs that he was conning them.
Were you asleep for the 1st 2 years of the Biden admin? Censorship, lockdowns, mandates of a vaccine not properly tested, proxy war with Russia, massive inflation, illegal immigration run amok, genocide in Gaza, significant increase in homelessness, blew up the Nordstream pipeline -- a massive ecological disaster, Justice Dept going after leading GOP contender for the presidency, labeling Catholics and parents terrorists , FBI fake kidnap plot of Michigan Dem governor, ect.
Worst admin of my lifetime for sure. And most have been terrible
FBI fake kidnapping plot of Michigan Governor Witner???? You are into crazy conspiracies aren't you. Two of the plotters pleased guilty and were sent to jail!
I have to ask you, on some level you know Trump is a conman right? You have to know.
In a year, if the crazy thing happens and Trump is elected, it indeed will be a sad day for all of America and democracy.
Some might be happy initially, but some years down the line they will be denying to their kids and grandkids that they actually voted for the conman. It will be hard for them to explain that they didn't notice all the signs that he was conning them.
CORRECT!
The folks who want to have Trump as a dictator (which is all Trumpettes, whether they admit it or not as well as all the "I'm can't stand Trump but..." crowd), don't seem to think ahead.
Even if you like/love Trump (seems weird to even type those words), once we go to an authoritarian system, there's no going back. Who will be dictator for life after Trump? What about the one after that? Which dictator will be the one you hate but have no way of voting out of office, or even expressing displeasure with?