Sally Vix wrote:
BUTT HILLARY!!!! wrote:
BUT HILLARY!!!!
BUT HILLARY!!!!
BUT HILLARY!!!!
LOOK!!! SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK!!! SQUIRREL!!!
LOOK!!! SQUIRREL!!!
You are the only one bringing up Hillary. Time to dismiss her. Okay?
0/10
You have never called out a Trump supporter for brining up Hillary. Not even once. Do you get why that was posted just for you?
Democrats lose again wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Just for everyone's edification:
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
You will be saying the same thing in 2021 following Trump’s 2nd inauguration address.
Democrats lose again!!!!
I will be saying it as long as the investigations are open and Trump hasn't been held accountable. Doesn't make it less true if I say it now or in 2021.
Sally Vix wrote:
Is English your second or third language.
Oh, my! Sally, you are such a mean little boy.
This is an internet forum. Grammar checking is something losers, like you, do. So, keep on checking.
BUT HILLARY!!!! wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
You are the only one bringing up Hillary. Time to dismiss her. Okay?
0/10
You have never called out a Trump supporter for brining up Hillary. Not even once. Do you get why that was posted just for you?
Fair response. I will try to call out Trump supporters for bringing up Hillary in the future.
Sally Vix wrote:
BUT HILLARY!!!! wrote:
0/10
You have never called out a Trump supporter for brining up Hillary. Not even once. Do you get why that was posted just for you?
Fair response. I will try to call out Trump supporters for bringing up Hillary in the future.
^ Backpedaling.
It is too late for you to start now.
BUTT HILLARY!!!! wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Fair response. I will try to call out Trump supporters for bringing up Hillary in the future.
^ Backpedaling.
It is too late for you to start now.
LOL … Sally is having a hard time keeping his alternative posting persona straight.
Runningart2004 wrote:
agip wrote:
one of my favorite investing sayings fits here - "deficits are ok...until they aren't.'
Meaning borrowing is great until something happens and the merde hits the fan and then everything is terrible. But you never know when that is going to happen, and you don't know what will cause it.
Think of the financial crisis - it was great...all that money freed up from housing and all that value created. The economy did well with the bubble. Until it didn't.
So McConnell has said the national debt is driven by Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and that’s partially right. But how do you go about cutting back those programs in a way that would actually have a measurable affect without completely getting rid of them? You can’t. What about military spending? Republicans blame entitlement programs but don’t want to address the elephant in the room....because it predominantly votes for the other elephants. This doesn’t seem to be a problem though. The national debt seems to be just a number on a balance sheet with no real consequence. It’s a political tool.
So what about taxes? We had high marginal tax rates and more brackets for decades and had just as good if not better GDP growth without such high deficits each year. Politicians like to use scary language like “the Democrats want to take 70% of your pay!!”, but that’s just being dishonest.
Alan
Interest payments become quite a large part of the discretionary budget as the debt gets higher. It's not a problem if you can outgrow the debt, but Republicans like to live in a world where they see GDP increases of 5% YoY for like a decade (lol).
Flagpole wrote:
Democrats lose again wrote:
You will be saying the same thing in 2021 following Trump’s 2nd inauguration address.
Democrats lose again!!!!
I will be saying it as long as the investigations are open and Trump hasn't been held accountable. Doesn't make it less true if I say it now or in 2021.
But if you say it in 2021 then your prediction/Guarantee that Trump will not finish his first term will have been big-time wrong? Yes?
Imma just leave this here:
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-approval-rating-by-state-map-december-2018-2019-1
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Just for everyone's edification:
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Flagpole ... that proclamation is soooo 2018. Time to get with the times. It appears that AOC may see the inside of a prison cell before the Donald.
1) You aren't doing a good job of not responding to me like you said...just so you know. You said that with some certainty too, so I guess according to you that was a guarantee. I guess you went back on a guarantee.
2) I read the stories about AOC today, and I have a couple comments about them and her...A) I'm not a big fan of her today. She has next to no experience in politics or in life, and I don't find her all that dynamic, so for now I'm not on her fan bandwagon. Once she has several years in Congress or other elected positions, then depending on what her views are then, I might change my mind. I'm not for the free college thing, so that's a strike against her (and Bernie too), and B) based on today's story about her, she won't face prison time. She MIGHT for things she does in the future or has done in the past yet discovered, but from today's story, no.
3) Donald Trump is a serial liar and a criminal as well as a horrible human being and incompetent as President. He will come out of all of this a broken man, and he WILL go to prison.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Imma just leave this here:
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-approval-rating-by-state-map-december-2018-2019-1
Democrats are totally out of touch with the American people. They will reject socialism, green new deal, identity politics and other democrat garbage big time.
Trump re-elected in a landslide!!!
You’re a biased Christian hater who can’t see reality.
Democrats lose again!!!
Racket wrote:
math buoy wrote:
Hey. Can you tell me what 5% of 1200 is? ;-)
Trivial, and we leave this exercise to the interested reader
LOL. I remember that back and forth.
Quite embarrassing.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole ... that proclamation is soooo 2018. Time to get with the times. It appears that AOC may see the inside of a prison cell before the Donald.
1) You aren't doing a good job of not responding to me like you said...just so you know. You said that with some certainty too, so I guess according to you that was a guarantee. I guess you went back on a guarantee.
2) I read the stories about AOC today, and I have a couple comments about them and her...A) I'm not a big fan of her today. She has next to no experience in politics or in life, and I don't find her all that dynamic, so for now I'm not on her fan bandwagon. Once she has several years in Congress or other elected positions, then depending on what her views are then, I might change my mind. I'm not for the free college thing, so that's a strike against her (and Bernie too), and B) based on today's story about her, she won't face prison time. She MIGHT for things she does in the future or has done in the past yet discovered, but from today's story, no.
3) Donald Trump is a serial liar and a criminal as well as a horrible human being and incompetent as President. He will come out of all of this a broken man, and he WILL go to prison.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Flagpole - you are an intelligent individual. Please explain to me how "... it appears that AOC may see the inside of a prison cell before Trump..." constitutes a guarantee. It seems more a wishful speculation than a guarantee. Would you not agree?
Raybum wrote:
The Mueller investigation is costing millions of dollars (money well spent).
Net gain. Asset forfeiture.
no protection wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Is English your second or third language.
Oh, my! Sally, you are such a mean little boy.
This is an internet forum. Grammar checking is something losers, like you, do. So, keep on checking.
Are you calling Flagpole a loser?
Raybum wrote:
I'm all for getting Trump. I think he's likely guilty of A LOT of things. However, why is Congress investigating the same things that Mueller is investigating? Do they not trust Mueller or think that he is not doing a good job? Plus, they are investigating the same things the SDNY is. The Mueller investigation is costing millions of dollars (money well spent). Why waste more taxpayer money on duplicate investigations?
1) Congress has an obligation to do so. The Republican-led Congress had that obligation and they did not fulfill it.
2) Mueller and the SDNY and the New York Attorney General and several other agencies and offices are investigating Trump for criminal activity that will be dealt with LEGALLY. Congress' job is to perform oversight and then make determinations that are POLITICAL.
3) The criminal investigations into Trump may take years (some for sure will). Congress sees a clear and present danger and wants to get enough information as soon as possible to either show that there really is NOT a clear and present danger or that there is so that they can begin impeachment proceedings.
Despite the comments from Trumpers here, the House WILL impeach Trump...unless he dies first, there is criminal activity that prevents it, or he resigns first, or aliens from space make it not so.
Runningart2004 wrote:
So McConnell has said the national debt is driven by Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid and that’s partially right. But how do you go about cutting back those programs in a way that would actually have a measurable affect without completely getting rid of them? You can’t. What about military spending? Republicans blame entitlement programs but don’t want to address the elephant in the room....because it predominantly votes for the other elephants. This doesn’t seem to be a problem though. The national debt seems to be just a number on a balance sheet with no real consequence. It’s a political tool.
So what about taxes? We had high marginal tax rates and more brackets for decades and had just as good if not better GDP growth without such high deficits each year. Politicians like to use scary language like “the Democrats want to take 70% of your pay!!”, but that’s just being dishonest.
Alan
"Just a number on a balance sheet with no real consequence"?!? SMH
How about interest [ayments of $400 Billion per year now growing to $1 Trillion in ten years?
Or how about you might want to talk to Venezuela, circa 2017, pretty much all of Latin America circa 1980s, Germany pre-Hitler, Greece just this decade. Or perhaps read up on the fall of the Roman Empire.
I could go on. But yeah, I know, this time is different!
Faux News is attempting to convince their audience that the following investigations of Trump must be quashed.
Anything related to any foreign government payments to Trump’s businesses.
Anything that might shed light on Trump’s Moscow Tower project.
Anything related to whether Trump’s lawyers rewrote Michael Cohen’s original testimony, which he was caught lying while under oath.
Anything related to Trump’s efforts to obstruct the Mueller investigation.
Anything related to criminal hush money payments to keep women and people quiet.
not Flagpole wrote:
no protection wrote:
Oh, my! Sally, you are such a mean little boy.
This is an internet forum. Grammar checking is something losers, like you, do. So, keep on checking.
Are you calling Flagpole a loser?
Why would flagpole be responsible for any action by sally?
Faux Gnus wrote:
Faux News is attempting to convince their audience that the following investigations of Trump must be quashed.
Anything related to any foreign government payments to Trump’s businesses.
Anything that might shed light on Trump’s Moscow Tower project.
Anything related to whether Trump’s lawyers rewrote Michael Cohen’s original testimony, which he was caught lying while under oath.
Anything related to Trump’s efforts to obstruct the Mueller investigation.
Anything related to criminal hush money payments to keep women and people quiet.
And if this were Mueller investigating Obama for the same charges, Faux would be demanding his lynching.