Nope. Any entity that would give Donald Trump an A(+) or an F(-) would be a bore IMO. Reality calls for more nuance.
Oh, we're grading things? Great. Please answer the following (of a VERY truncated potential list). And if you want to make it really fun, pretend that you're doing it in 2015. Should one or more of the following earn ANY U.S. president a grade of F-?
1) Again, #1: Clearly tried to steal a presidential election.
Nah, I'll just stop there. It suffices.
The depths of your idiocy are something to witness. You guys tried framing a President as a Russian agent, beginning in 2015. If this is not an attempt to overthrow the US Government, then no attempt has ever been made.
Go back to your roots and begin the lesson here Chief.
Trump: In a very short period of time, like, about a year and a half, you're going to have the best ballroom
And have it forever.
IF (and a really big "if") that building really is 100% funded by bribes to Trump, it would be GREAT to see the next president tear it down. Like, Day One. Go straight from the swearing in to some form of ceremonial start to the demolition. Mostly destroyed by nightfall.
And then maybe send commemorative broken bricks to all of the donors.
Send the rest of the debris to the Trump Presidential Library (...absurd even to type those 2 words by each other).
IF (and a really big "if") that building really is 100% funded by bribes to Trump, it would be GREAT to see the next president tear it down. Like, Day One. Go straight from the swearing in to some form of ceremonial start to the demolition. Mostly destroyed by nightfall.
And then maybe send commemorative broken bricks to all of the donors.
Send the rest of the debris to the Trump Presidential Library (...absurd even to type those 2 words by each other).
That will never, ever happen. Possibly you nut jobs could do some alterations and a rename (long after we are gone of course), but those pile drivers are staking that building forever.
And calling you all nut jobs is not some personal attack, it’s what’s rooted in your thinking as a group. You’re out of control crazy.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
IF (and a really big "if") that building really is 100% funded by bribes to Trump, it would be GREAT to see the next president tear it down. Like, Day One. Go straight from the swearing in to some form of ceremonial start to the demolition. Mostly destroyed by nightfall.
And then maybe send commemorative broken bricks to all of the donors.
Send the rest of the debris to the Trump Presidential Library (...absurd even to type those 2 words by each other).
The building is funded by gifts from tremendous corporations.
Oh, we're grading things? Great. Please answer the following (of a VERY truncated potential list). And if you want to make it really fun, pretend that you're doing it in 2015. Should one or more of the following earn ANY U.S. president a grade of F-?
1) Again, #1: Clearly tried to steal a presidential election.
Nah, I'll just stop there. It suffices.
The depths of your idiocy are something to witness. You guys tried framing a President as a Russian agent, beginning in 2015. If this is not an attempt to overthrow the US Government, then no attempt has ever been made.
Go back to your roots and begin the lesson here Chief.
Silly, one-millionth reminder: Donald Trump's CURRENT Secretary of State AND National Security Advisor completely disagreed with the gist of your statement above. Very, very officially disagreed with the implication.
And as a bonus, NO ONE needs to apologize for seeing about 95% of Trump's treatment of Putin/Russia as VERY much like one might see from an actual agent.
IF (and a really big "if") that building really is 100% funded by bribes to Trump, it would be GREAT to see the next president tear it down. Like, Day One. Go straight from the swearing in to some form of ceremonial start to the demolition. Mostly destroyed by nightfall.
And then maybe send commemorative broken bricks to all of the donors.
Send the rest of the debris to the Trump Presidential Library (...absurd even to type those 2 words by each other).
That will never, ever happen. Possibly you nut jobs could do some alterations and a rename (long after we are gone of course), but those pile drivers are staking that building forever.
And calling you all nut jobs is not some personal attack, it’s what’s rooted in your thinking as a group. You’re out of control crazy.
Bold prediction !!!
You're really good at focusing on the important stuff !
IF (and a really big "if") that building really is 100% funded by bribes to Trump, it would be GREAT to see the next president tear it down. Like, Day One. Go straight from the swearing in to some form of ceremonial start to the demolition. Mostly destroyed by nightfall.
And then maybe send commemorative broken bricks to all of the donors.
Send the rest of the debris to the Trump Presidential Library (...absurd even to type those 2 words by each other).
That will never, ever happen. Possibly you nut jobs could do some alterations and a rename (long after we are gone of course), but those pile drivers are staking that building forever.
And calling you all nut jobs is not some personal attack, it’s what’s rooted in your thinking as a group. You’re out of control crazy.
Today's unsolicited, complimentary (that means "free") lesson in counter-productive hyperbole:
Group A labels the unilateral, completely un-discussed destruction of one-third of the White House by a president as "bad." Additionally, they find the private funding of the replacement to smack of possible bribery/corruption.
Person B labels the above sentiments as "out of control crazy."
Chuck Schumer voted “Yes” for the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act of 1986, which authorized the military to fire on drug smuggling boats. The House approved it 392-16 and the Senate approved it 97-2. With that being said, shouldn’t Chuck Schumer and the clown show democrats… pic.twitter.com/Ix1DIiov40
IF (and a really big "if") that building really is 100% funded by bribes to Trump, it would be GREAT to see the next president tear it down. Like, Day One. Go straight from the swearing in to some form of ceremonial start to the demolition. Mostly destroyed by nightfall.
And then maybe send commemorative broken bricks to all of the donors.
Send the rest of the debris to the Trump Presidential Library (...absurd even to type those 2 words by each other).
The building is funded by gifts from tremendous corporations.
Yes, tremendous corporations.
Tremendous corporations whose leaders wake up in the middle of the night worrying about whether or not they're kissing the r*** of the president enough ?
JUST LIKE free markets are supposed to work !
Winning !!! We're for freedom and free markets and law and order, and.........!!!
Good post. Isn't it frustrating when our government can't be straight shooters and name laws clearly and honestly? WE ALL KNOW that the name of the law SHOULD have been the, "We Can Murder POSSIBLE Drug Traffickers in Boats Whenever We Want Act."
Schumer was ALL FOR that !
'mericuh !!!
(still curious when the Red Hatters are going to start insisting on Hellfire attacks on meth labs in red America where their brother makes a living?)
Racism is, by and large, everywhere. Fuentes makes this point truthfully. To suggest Democrats are not racist is fantasy and destroys your entire argument at its core.
To prove the point, let’s take a poll of all you white liberals and ask how many of you live in black neighborhoods, when you no doubt could? For the record, my neighborhood is about 40% White, 40% black, 19% hispanic. And some Jamaican's .
agreed that most people are basically racist. That's just humanity.
BUT
the difference is that the D party takes actions to reduce the harm from racism and pull the nation together, while the current R party is openly racist and is in fact intending to separate us from each other by race. The country openly says that its intention is to defend the white race from invasion by black and brown people. The leader of the GOP is an open racist and encourages us all to be.
I'm no genius, but I think there's a difference there.
(for the record, my congressional district is 65% white, then a big mix of everything else)
Good post. Isn't it frustrating when our government can't be straight shooters and name laws clearly and honestly? WE ALL KNOW that the name of the law SHOULD have been the, "We Can Murder POSSIBLE Drug Traffickers in Boats Whenever We Want Act."
Schumer was ALL FOR that !
'mericuh !!!
(still curious when the Red Hatters are going to start insisting on Hellfire attacks on meth labs in red America where their brother makes a living?)
Sorry, that's an inconsistent suggestion. If we're keeping consistent with blowing up boats from Venzuela to stop fentanyl, the suggestion would be this:
Vaporize weed shops in red America to stop meth (and/or fentanyl) deaths.
The building is funded by gifts from tremendous corporations.
Yes, tremendous corporations.
Tremendous corporations whose leaders wake up in the middle of the night worrying about whether or not they're kissing the r*** of the president enough ?
JUST LIKE free markets are supposed to work !
Winning !!! We're for freedom and free markets and law and order, and.........!!!
many/most of those companies that donated to the ballroom have big regulatory issues in front of the White House so they are bribing the president. I know Rs have been convinced by trump that bribes are good and fair, so the situation is difficult to talk about.
To prove the point, let’s take a poll of all you white liberals and ask how many of you live in black neighborhoods, when you no doubt could? For the record, my neighborhood is about 40% White, 40% black, 19% hispanic. And some Jamaican's .
agreed that most people are basically racist. That's just humanity.
BUT
the difference is that the D party takes actions to reduce the harm from racism and pull the nation together, while the current R party is openly racist and is in fact intending to separate us from each other by race. The country openly says that its intention is to defend the white race from invasion by black and brown people. The leader of the GOP is an open racist and encourages us all to be.
I'm no genius, but I think there's a difference there.
(for the record, my congressional district is 65% white, then a big mix of everything else)
Democrats advocate for affirmative action / DEI. That is racism
Tremendous corporations whose leaders wake up in the middle of the night worrying about whether or not they're kissing the r*** of the president enough ?
JUST LIKE free markets are supposed to work !
Winning !!! We're for freedom and free markets and law and order, and.........!!!
many/most of those companies that donated to the ballroom have big regulatory issues in front of the White House so they are bribing the president. I know Rs have been convinced by trump that bribes are good and fair, so the situation is difficult to talk about.
It's incredible to reflect on the fact that 2 huge components of Trump's base are:
1) Wealthy people who don't need ANY help from him to enjoy their extremely comfortable lives. And yet they still support that miserable human being.
2) Decidedly non-wealthy people who could use government's help, were dumb enough to think that Trump would provide that, and STILL think that it's OK that he has and is doing things clearly counter-productive to that. And yet they still support that miserable human being.
agreed that most people are basically racist. That's just humanity.
BUT
the difference is that the D party takes actions to reduce the harm from racism and pull the nation together, while the current R party is openly racist and is in fact intending to separate us from each other by race. The country openly says that its intention is to defend the white race from invasion by black and brown people. The leader of the GOP is an open racist and encourages us all to be.
I'm no genius, but I think there's a difference there.
(for the record, my congressional district is 65% white, then a big mix of everything else)
Democrats advocate for affirmative action / DEI. That is racism
I can't really disagree. But clearly in the world we live in, the underdog/overdog filter is useful here.
if racism is being used to kick poor underserved people while they are down, that's worse than racism used to try to help the poor underserved people.
In the real world, trumpists making it harder for black people in Alabama to vote is worse than bidenists making it easier for Alabama's black kids to get into college.
But sure, it's cheap and easy to say 'all actions decided by race are bad'
many/most of those companies that donated to the ballroom have big regulatory issues in front of the White House so they are bribing the president. I know Rs have been convinced by trump that bribes are good and fair, so the situation is difficult to talk about.
It's incredible to reflect on the fact that 2 huge components of Trump's base are:
1) Wealthy people who don't need ANY help from him to enjoy their extremely comfortable lives. And yet they still support that miserable human being.
2) Decidedly non-wealthy people who could use government's help, were dumb enough to think that Trump would provide that, and STILL think that it's OK that he has and is doing things clearly counter-productive to that. And yet they still support that miserable human being.
nice 'people at the diner' story about how the piggists in GA are dealing with supporting Greene and Trump.
they just can't conceive of supporting anyone but Republicans. Not in their souls. No matter what Dem policies would help them. Policy isn't the point.
Democrats advocate for affirmative action / DEI. That is racism
I can't really disagree. But clearly in the world we live in, the underdog/overdog filter is useful here.
if racism is being used to kick poor underserved people while they are down, that's worse than racism used to try to help the poor underserved people.
In the real world, trumpists making it harder for black people in Alabama to vote is worse than bidenists making it easier for Alabama's black kids to get into college.
But sure, it's cheap and easy to say 'all actions decided by race are bad'
It is entirely possible to be mostly or entirely against affirmative action in hiring and college admissions, while (EASILY) seeing Trumpism as comprehensively horrible, and a mortal danger to this country. The two have little or nothing to do with each other.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.