Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

Lying Flag wrote:

Funny how only NOW does Flagpole say that Trump may not be charged with some because of plea bargains or pardon.

What a weasel.

Well, I have said that many times in this thread including this bit from May 21, 2018:

"It is possible that some of the above will drop off as part of a plea, but what is left will be enough to end Trump's presidency."

Would you like to make any more statements that I will prove you wrong about?

Here's a tip, brother...I NEVER lie, backpedal, weasel or anything like that to avoid admitting I was wrong about something. I have 100% integrity 100% of the time.

Your apology to me in your mind is enough for me.

Incorrect!

You have already been proven a liar and a fraud.

Sally Vix wrote:

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Paula Jones accused Clinton of sexual harassment. The only thing that could be proven was that they were alone together in a hotel room. If he did what she claimed, and she wasn't particularly credible, it wasn't a criminal act. She didn't work for either him or the state of Arkansas so it wasn't even sexual harassment.

Milwee and Willee claimed they were groped, which is not a criminal act and is the same thing Trumped bragged about and was accused of.

Broadrick was he said, she said. I tend to believe her, but there is no evidence and at one time she recanted her accusation.

Saying there were rape victims too embarrassed to come forward is bullish*t. You could say that about any man.

Groping is not a criminal act? So, you think groping is okay?

Clinton is a sexual predator. He’s a product of the times when sexual harassment in the workplace was tolerated. Sexual Harassment is not ok. No Democratic with an ounce of integrity still supports this guy.

But......IF we are taking accusations at face value when there is no conviction or even evidence ....what about Kavannaugh? What about Trump and the dozen or so sexual harassment accusations he has against him?

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t demonize Clinton’s accused actions while being ok with Trump’s accused actions. Unless you’re a biased immoral hypocrite. We at least have Trump on tape.

Alan

[Conway's husband: 'Grounds for impeachment' if Trump directed Cohn to block AT&T-Time Warner merger]

http://va.topbuzz.com/s/dNhvrQ

So if Trump actually pressured the DOJ to stop a media merger in order to enact some sort of revenge because he doesn't like CNNs coverage of him.........is that an impeachable offense?

When are RepubliKKKKans gonna admit this guy Trump is a criminal?

SDSU Aztec wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Groping is not a criminal act? So, you think groping is okay?

No, it's disgusting and something I would never do. However, no one has gone to jail over it and your initial comment was Bill should be in prison. You seem to think he was a serial rapist, but there is zero evidence to support that.

Groping is sexaul assault.

According to the United States Department of Justice, sexual assault is “any type of sexual contact or behavior that occurs without the explicit consent of the recipient.” Sexual assault is basically an umbrella term that includes sexual activities such as rape, fondling, and attempted rape.

Sally Vix wrote:

Did you also predict that Republicans would retain their majority in the Senate?

I din't make a prediction on that but I laid out a path for the Democrats to gain control.

They needed to gain two seats and I focused on 4 seats that a chance to flip - NV, AZ, TX and TN.

I was really hyping up Beto to beat Cruz, but it didn't happen.

They did flip 2 seats but ND, MO and IN proved to be too red for Dems to hold on.

And FL was a squeaker of a R flip with a recount and some shadiness.

Republicans were only defending 9 seats, everyone of them in state that Trump won.

It would have been a disaster for Republicans if they didn't retain their majority in that situation.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Groping is not a criminal act? So, you think groping is okay?

Clinton is a sexual predator. He’s a product of the times when sexual harassment in the workplace was tolerated. Sexual Harassment is not ok. No Democratic with an ounce of integrity still supports this guy.

But......IF we are taking accusations at face value when there is no conviction or even evidence ....what about Kavannaugh? What about Trump and the dozen or so sexual harassment accusations he has against him?

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t demonize Clinton’s accused actions while being ok with Trump’s accused actions. Unless you’re a biased immoral hypocrite. We at least have Trump on tape.

Alan

If the charges against Trump are proved to be true, throw the slimeball out of office. He is a slimeball. I disagree with the Democrats trying to reverse the election but if Trump is that much of a slimeball, let Pence take over. Impeach and convict him.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole, this is a quote from you earlier ...

"You are definitely describing many of the Trump voters, but they are not ALL like that. Some are educated and connected to the news and how things are turning out, and those people will turn. Trump didn't win by much, and he will need all of the voters he got and then some to win again. Hillary was a flawed candidate and will not be running in 2020 (at least I hope so).

I maintain that Trump will not be able to be elected on election day. He will resign or be impeached and removed before then, because the evidence and the heat will be too much.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

You kind of guaranteed Trump being gone before end of his first term.

A guarantee TYPICALLY has something of value put up against it...like a free repair or some sort of action if the stated event is not met. I have provided no such thing.

Let's go to the definition of "guarantee" as a verb:

WAY down at the very last usage of "guarantee" is this:

Guarantee: to assert confidently.

While I never used the word "guarantee", again due to its normal association of giving something up if it doesn't come true, I DO agree that I have asserted confidently that he will not finish his first term, so if you want to call it a "guarantee", then I will abide by that ruling. Just for clarity though, I do not intend to use the word "guarantee" with any of my predictions about Trump for the very reason I stated.

Regardless of this usage of "guarantee", I have made a prediction that he will not finish his first term, and on that I will either be wrong or right. For the record, I do maintain today that he will not finish his first term.

Sally Vix wrote:

If the charges against Trump are proved to be true, throw the slimeball out of office. He is a slimeball. I disagree with the Democrats trying to reverse the election but if Trump is that much of a slimeball, let Pence take over. Impeach and convict him.

Dude, no one is trying to "reverse" the election. It's about finding out whether or not he has committed crimes (by the Mueller investigation), and whether or not those crimes are impeachable or not (by the usual protocols of Congressional hearings).

So, according to what you just posted, you have guaranteed that Trump will not finish his first term. You have been asserting and continue to assert that Trump will not finish his first term. The definition you generously provided us establishes that you, Flagpole, has in the past guaranteed and do still currently guarantee that Trump WILL NOT finish his first term. Well done!

Flagpole wrote:

Lying Flag wrote:

Funny how only NOW does Flagpole say that Trump may not be charged with some because of plea bargains or pardon.

What a weasel.

Well, I have said that many times in this thread including this bit from May 21, 2018:

"It is possible that some of the above will drop off as part of a plea, but what is left will be enough to end Trump's presidency."

Would you like to make any more statements that I will prove you wrong about?

Here's a tip, brother...I NEVER lie, backpedal, weasel or anything like that to avoid admitting I was wrong about something. I have 100% integrity 100% of the time.

Your apology to me in your mind is enough for me.

I love when Flagpole talks with himself.

Good times.

Racket wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

If the charges against Trump are proved to be true, throw the slimeball out of office. He is a slimeball. I disagree with the Democrats trying to reverse the election but if Trump is that much of a slimeball, let Pence take over. Impeach and convict him.

Dude, no one is trying to "reverse" the election. It's about finding out whether or not he has committed crimes (by the Mueller investigation), and whether or not those crimes are impeachable or not (by the usual protocols of Congressional hearings).

Now we have Sally making up this assertion that Dems are trying to reverse the election and making up evidence of Bill’s rapes... wtf?

Fair and balanced wrote:

[Conway's husband: 'Grounds for impeachment' if Trump directed Cohn to block AT&T-Time Warner merger]

http://va.topbuzz.com/s/dNhvrQ

So if Trump actually pressured the DOJ to stop a media merger in order to enact some sort of revenge because he doesn't like CNNs coverage of him.........is that an impeachable offense?

When are RepubliKKKKans gonna admit this guy Trump is a criminal?

Probably when DemoKKKrats stop wearing black face, using racial epithets, being misogynists and anti-semites.

Trollminator wrote:

Racket wrote:

Dude, no one is trying to "reverse" the election. It's about finding out whether or not he has committed crimes (by the Mueller investigation), and whether or not those crimes are impeachable or not (by the usual protocols of Congressional hearings).

Now we have Sally making up this assertion that Dems are trying to reverse the election and making up evidence of Bill’s rapes... wtf?

Yeah, reversing an election is difficult. If Trump gets the boot, we'll get Pence. Pence's policies will be about the same, but we'll never see another presidential tweet.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Clinton is a sexual predator. He’s a product of the times when sexual harassment in the workplace was tolerated. Sexual Harassment is not ok. No Democratic with an ounce of integrity still supports this guy.

But......IF we are taking accusations at face value when there is no conviction or even evidence ....what about Kavannaugh? What about Trump and the dozen or so sexual harassment accusations he has against him?

You can’t have it both ways. You can’t demonize Clinton’s accused actions while being ok with Trump’s accused actions. Unless you’re a biased immoral hypocrite. We at least have Trump on tape.

Alan

^This. It'll be interesting if the Epstein case (underage girls) gets some traction. In addition to Trump and Dershowitz, Clinton is directly linked to Epstein. LOTS of powerful men tied to Epstein. There will be a gigantic effort to make it all go away without naming names.

And, yes, groping is against the law.

Publishers lining up to do book versions of the Mueller report. Fatal for politicians to have their crimes constantly publicized, beyond the legal issues.

Trollminator wrote:

Racket wrote:

Dude, no one is trying to "reverse" the election. It's about finding out whether or not he has committed crimes (by the Mueller investigation), and whether or not those crimes are impeachable or not (by the usual protocols of Congressional hearings).

Now we have Sally making up this assertion that Dems are trying to reverse the election and making up evidence of Bill’s rapes... wtf?

After 2+ years, most Dems have given up overturning the election. But, dude, for the first year after the election most Dems were all over trying to get Hillary into the WH. It was embarrassing.

Counter wrote:

After 2+ years, most Dems have given up overturning the election. But, dude, for the first year after the election most Dems were all over trying to get Hillary into the WH. It was embarrassing.

Of course there were a few outliers, but the vast majority understood there was no legal basis to reverse an election. Again, it's been about getting the traitor-in-chief removed.

nontrumper wrote:

Counter wrote:

After 2+ years, most Dems have given up overturning the election. But, dude, for the first year after the election most Dems were all over trying to get Hillary into the WH. It was embarrassing.

Of course there were a few outliers, but the vast majority understood there was no legal basis to reverse an election. Again, it's been about getting the traitor-in-chief removed.

I don't give them that much credit.

Like I said, it does technically fall under a definition of "guarantee", so even though I am not using that word, I will accept your use of it. And yes, I still maintain that he will not finish his first term.