Is anyone following the way Trump is acting like a petulant child in court today? Desperately trying to get the judge to throw him out to play into his innocent victim propaganda.
Translation: Soros-appointed judge threatens to try Trump in absentia like they did in Nuremberger in violation of every known Constitutional right to thwart one's alleged "accuser" who has lied to fill their Deep State pockets with graft.
Mitt could have added that Trump was also found to be running a fraudulent enterprise.
Mitt Romney: "You had a jury that said that Donald Trump had raped a woman, and yet I don’t think that seems to be moving the needle. There are a lot of things about today’s electorate I don’t understand.”
The jury said he didn't rape her because there was zero proof of anything.
Mitt's lying.
Have to call BS on you too, champ.
Mitt is telling the truth.
An actual legal expert:
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.
It says a lot about the complete lack of depth on Democrat bench that there's no one more viable than a dementia ridden fool like Biden.
Totally off. Nothing to do with depth (there are several who would be light years better than Trump and his grovelers) and everything to do with the party command getting behind the one they think can win . For 2020, they assessed, and correctly, that the majority of Americans preferred vanilla ice cream over another 4 years of recklessness and division. They are making that bet again. Why would they mess with a winning team at this stage especially when the incumbent has a massive political and financial advantage?
"A winning team" you mean to say that the president with the worst presidential approval rating in 15 years is a "winning team?"
The jury said he didn't rape her because there was zero proof of anything.
Mitt's lying.
Have to call BS on you too, champ.
Mitt is telling the truth.
An actual legal expert:
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
That's the stupidest thing I've ever read in my life.
The jury said he didn't rape her because there was zero proof of anything.
Mitt's lying.
Have to call BS on you too, champ.
Mitt is telling the truth.
An actual legal expert:
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
"Therefore, in order for Ms. Carroll to prevail on the statute of limitations, she needed to prove [by a preponderance of the evidence] that she was the victim of rape or sexual abuse or forcible touching. "Any one of the three would have sufficed. The jury found two of the three applied, but not rape."
The woman is a lying wh*re. Only leftist imbeciles who desperately wanted to believe her absurd story could believe Trump had any interest in this unattractive 50+ year old cow.
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
That's the stupidest thing I've ever read in my life.
Even dumber if you know there was literally ZERO evidence presented at trial beyond the skank's word.
He "raped" her and yet she remained a huge fan of Trump and even raved about "The Apprentice" being her favorite TV show on social media in 2012.
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
That's the stupidest thing I've ever read in my life.
trump was found liable of sexual assault. Jamming your finger into a woman's privates against her will is generally frowned upon by civilized people and referred to as 'rape' in common talk. You want to say jamming your hand into a woman isn't rape...well ok that's cool, cool, cool. You go do that.
IN fact, yYou boys go ahead and defend Trump, knowing what he was found liable for. I hope the decent people in your life will understand you are just arguing with strangers on the internet and you would never say these things in public.
That's the stupidest thing I've ever read in my life.
trump was found liable of sexual assault. Jamming your finger into a woman's privates against her will is generally frowned upon by civilized people and referred to as 'rape' in common talk. You want to say jamming your hand into a woman isn't rape...well ok that's cool, cool, cool. You go do that.
IN fact, yYou boys go ahead and defend Trump, knowing what he was found liable for. I hope the decent people in your life will understand you are just arguing with strangers on the internet and you would never say these things in public.
Trump is a sexual pig but I don't think forced sexual groping is rape. Rape is violent crime where a penis is forced into a woman's vagina. That level of trauma is so much more invasive and traumatic than forced molestation.
That's the stupidest thing I've ever read in my life.
trump was found liable of sexual assault. Jamming your finger into a woman's privates against her will is generally frowned upon by civilized people and referred to as 'rape' in common talk. You want to say jamming your hand into a woman isn't rape...well ok that's cool, cool, cool. You go do that.
IN fact, yYou boys go ahead and defend Trump, knowing what he was found liable for. I hope the decent people in your life will understand you are just arguing with strangers on the internet and you would never say these things in public.
The New York legal system is ridiculous. Changing the statute of limitations (which is there for people who prefer things like evidence) to allow for the E Jean show trial was pathetic. Almost as bad as the Alvin Bragg case or the Tish James case. All funded by left wing donors who hate Trump. If you have enough money in New York, you can get your opponent tried for a crime.
Totally off. Nothing to do with depth (there are several who would be light years better than Trump and his grovelers) and everything to do with the party command getting behind the one they think can win . For 2020, they assessed, and correctly, that the majority of Americans preferred vanilla ice cream over another 4 years of recklessness and division. They are making that bet again. Why would they mess with a winning team at this stage especially when the incumbent has a massive political and financial advantage?
"A winning team" you mean to say that the president with the worst presidential approval rating in 15 years is a "winning team?"
What more important to you, actually winning elections as the Democrats have done to a great extent, or being ahead in the polls with the election almost a year off?
I prefer actually winning. (Another seat just flipped in Florida State election)
trump was found liable of sexual assault. Jamming your finger into a woman's privates against her will is generally frowned upon by civilized people and referred to as 'rape' in common talk. You want to say jamming your hand into a woman isn't rape...well ok that's cool, cool, cool. You go do that.
IN fact, yYou boys go ahead and defend Trump, knowing what he was found liable for. I hope the decent people in your life will understand you are just arguing with strangers on the internet and you would never say these things in public.
Trump is a sexual pig but I don't think forced sexual groping is rape. Rape is violent crime where a penis is forced into a woman's vagina. That level of trauma is so much more invasive and traumatic than forced molestation.
That's what the liberals want you to believe. They can't even think which transgender they are, and they want you to adopt their alleged definition of "bathroom" in an effort to subvert established principles of deviancy.
trump was found liable of sexual assault. Jamming your finger into a woman's privates against her will is generally frowned upon by civilized people and referred to as 'rape' in common talk. You want to say jamming your hand into a woman isn't rape...well ok that's cool, cool, cool. You go do that.
IN fact, yYou boys go ahead and defend Trump, knowing what he was found liable for. I hope the decent people in your life will understand you are just arguing with strangers on the internet and you would never say these things in public.
Trump is a sexual pig but I don't think forced sexual groping is rape. Rape is violent crime where a penis is forced into a woman's vagina. That level of trauma is so much more invasive and traumatic than forced molestation.
Semantics. Not all that relevant. The judge said 'yeah in common talk when you forceably put your hand into a woman's privates, people call that rape. If you did that with an object you'd call it rape, if you did it with your hand you'd call it rape.'
And you see what people like adult are doing here, right?
They are saying 'hah trump was not found liable for rape!' it's all lies so you can ignore the whole thing and Joe Biden showers with his daughter.'
So you go ahead and help adult on his merry mission to excuse Trump's sexual attacks with your semantic argument. I'm sure that's what's best for the nation.
The jury said he didn't rape her because there was zero proof of anything.
Mitt's lying.
Have to call BS on you too, champ.
Mitt is telling the truth.
An actual legal expert:
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Is your "legal expert" the same kind of expert as Paul Krugman is an economics expert?
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Is your "legal expert" the same kind of expert as Paul Krugman is an economics expert?
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote. He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
"Therefore, in order for Ms. Carroll to prevail on the statute of limitations, she needed to prove [by a preponderance of the evidence] that she was the victim of rape or sexual abuse or forcible touching. "Any one of the three would have sufficed. The jury found two of the three applied, but not rape."
The woman is a lying wh*re. Only leftist imbeciles who desperately wanted to believe her absurd story could believe Trump had any interest in this unattractive 50+ year old cow.
What thread is this? Is it the one about the Cleveland Swat team hitting up the wrong house . Several people including the landlord gave them the information before they were brought harm to a baby.
“The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.” For the first time ever, the new definition includes any gender of victim and perpetrator, not just women being raped by men. It also recognizes that rape with an object can be as traumatic as penile/vaginal rape. This definition also includes instances in which the victim is unable to give consent because of temporary or permanent mental or physical incapacity. Furthermore, because many rapes are facilitated by drugs or alcohol, the new definition recognizes that a victim can be incapacitated and thus unable to consent because of ingestion of drugs or alcohol.
"Therefore, in order for Ms. Carroll to prevail on the statute of limitations, she needed to prove [by a preponderance of the evidence] that she was the victim of rape or sexual abuse or forcible touching. "Any one of the three would have sufficed. The jury found two of the three applied, but not rape."
The woman is a lying wh*re. Only leftist imbeciles who desperately wanted to believe her absurd story could believe Trump had any interest in this unattractive 50+ year old cow.
...
Even dumber if you know there was literally ZERO evidence presented at trial beyond the skank's word. He "raped" her and yet she remained a huge fan of Trump and even raved about "The Apprentice" being her favorite TV show on social media in 2012. The woman is a pig.
trump was found liable of sexual assault. Jamming your finger into a woman's privates against her will is generally frowned upon by civilized people and referred to as 'rape' in common talk. You want to say jamming your hand into a woman isn't rape...well ok that's cool, cool, cool. You go do that.
IN fact, yYou boys go ahead and defend Trump, knowing what he was found liable for. I hope the decent people in your life will understand you are just arguing with strangers on the internet and you would never say these things in public.
The New York legal system is ridiculous. Changing the statute of limitations (which is there for people who prefer things like evidence) to allow for the E Jean show trial was pathetic. Almost as bad as the Alvin Bragg case or the Tish James case. All funded by left wing donors who hate Trump. If you have enough money in New York, you can get your opponent tried for a crime.
Damn you guys will say anything to cover your orange God. It was fkn rape, stop protecting him.
