Once again, then the police shouldn’t be pelting runner bullets at pissed off protesters with flags exercising their Constitutional right. Then wave them into the Capitol and gun them down.
Your plan failed. I still have not seen a single video of a flag bearer violently assaulting a police officer. Lip service from your DOJ is not a trusted source. show me something. Could care less what your DOJ henchman say. gunning down Babbitt was serious.
You still didn't directly answer the question. Obviously, a Trump disciple.
As for the Babbitt shooting, any loss of life is a tragedy. However, she was a prior U.S. Air Force troop and knew exactly what she was doing entering a "Restricted Area" in a government facility. Based upon the circumstances, the USCP were doing their job properly.
So you have nothing but nonsense peddling. I’m looking for the video of the cop getting brutally assaulted and you spin nonsense. got it.
wonder if the USCP standard book you hail told cops to waive innocent people into the Capitol so they could put them in prison without a trial?
Did you move during the Biden years? When did you move back?
Nice try, but you failed like the poster who posted the same thing and you are parroting.
I did't come on here and complain every single day, LIKE YOU;)-------I lived my life for those 4 years, you can't as you've got TDS to the max. Does that help? So again, where are you moving to?
I"m going out the door now....to have fun. I'll check in with you tomorrow or Monday.
In other words, you simply can't provide even one valid example of where I was allegedly "proven wrong again and again." Classic MAGA move... when you are cornered, you deflect and/or ignore rather than acting like an adult and admitting that you were wrong.
Tariffs aren't going to do jack sh!t to fentanyl. Americans LOVE getting high. We have ALWAYS loved getting high. Americans know how to party. There is no way on Christ's green earth to change America's love for drugs or to stop the creative geniuses who always find ways to meet our nationwide demands for more of the good stuff. We are hooked up for good times from sea to shining fvcking sea. It's Nation Time!
So you have nothing but nonsense peddling. I’m looking for the video of the cop getting brutally assaulted and you spin nonsense. got it.
wonder if the USCP standard book you hail told cops to waive innocent people into the Capitol so they could put them in prison without a trial?
I hate to bruise your rather large ego, but just because you haven't seen a video does not mean that they don't exist.
As for the USCP rules of engagement, this is a relatively simple concept so I am taking a leap of faith that you can keep up.
Every government facility has areas that are unclassified and/or allowed public access. Many of them also have a classified area and/or Restricted Area. When you January 6th "protestors" forced their way into the latter variety, they broke the law... including Ashli Babbitt.
That being said, I don't expect much from a hardcore MAGA zealot who apparently doesn't mind assaulting police officers who are defending their workplace, as long as it isn't "serious."
I never said there were not a few simple assaults (on January 6th), maybe there were, certainly nothing serious...
I still can't quite get over this quote.
This is beyond callous, even by far-right MAGA standards. The overtly ruthless attitude towards the health and welfare of police officers who were entrusted to protect our elected congressional officials.
These so-called "protestors" broke into the Restricted Area of the U.S. Capitol and assaulted those police officers in their own workplace! But hey, as long as it wasn't a serious assault, it's all good, right?
Did you ever decide whether rescuing American hostages from Venezuela was a good thing or not?
All else being equal, sure it is!
But if there are bad knock-on effects, then maybe not. I don't know enough about the situation to say that there will or won't be.
See, that's the thing: Life in the real world is messy. Or, as H.L. Mencken observed, for every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.
This post was edited 29 seconds after it was posted.
An old man didn't want to lose face so he had to follow through on a threat.
Got tens of millions dead, stupidly.
Trump knows this trade war is stupid. But he made the promise so he thinks the most important thing is to follow through. Because he doesn't' want to embarrass himself and give his foes ammunition. He's not doing the tariffs for himself - he knows it will cost Americans billions or trillions of dollars. As with everything trump, he's doing the trade war just for himself. Just for himself. To save his thin-skinned pride. he doesn't care that he just raised taxes on americans by billions of dollars and alienated our closest allies.
This post was edited 7 minutes after it was posted.
An old man didn't want to lose face so he had to follow through on a threat.
Got tens of millions dead, stupidly.
Trump knows this trade war is stupid. But he made the promise so he thinks the most important thing is to follow through. Because he doesn't' want to embarrass himself and give his foes ammunition. He's not doing the tariffs for himself - he knows it will cost Americans billions or trillions of dollars. As with everything trump, he's doing the trade war just for himself. Just for himself. To save his thin-skinned pride. he doesn't care that he just raised taxes on americans by billions of dollars and alienated our closest allies.
sorry...he's not doing the tariffs for the *nation,* I meant to say.
Lawmakers have argued Mr. Trump cannot unilaterally shutter the agency legally, as the it was created by Congress and receives specific appropriations. The federal government, including U.S.A.I.D., is currently funded through March 14.
“Trump isn’t satisfied just to close programs and fire staff. He is now planning to ELIMINATE THE ENTIRE AGENCY. Maybe this weekend,” Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, wrote on social media on Saturday. “That would be illegal. He cannot unilaterally close a federal agency. Another assault on the Constitution.”
Lawmakers have argued Mr. Trump cannot unilaterally shutter the agency legally, as the it was created by Congress and receives specific appropriations. The federal government, including U.S.A.I.D., is currently funded through March 14.
“Trump isn’t satisfied just to close programs and fire staff. He is now planning to ELIMINATE THE ENTIRE AGENCY. Maybe this weekend,” Senator Chris Murphy, Democrat of Connecticut, wrote on social media on Saturday. “That would be illegal. He cannot unilaterally close a federal agency. Another assault on the Constitution.”
Doesn't need to terminate it. Just needs to view it as subordinate to MAGA. Do whatever he wants and then dare the courts to stop him / people to sue him. And if the courts issue an injunction, do it anyway. He won't be stopped. Liberals have done a ton of unconstitutional things (pick whatever gun restriction Illinois / California / New York have done lately) so serve them a taste of their own medicine.
My money's on the university that made a study of 46 million people.
Did you ever decide whether rescuing American hostages from Venezuela was a good thing or not?
If getting six Americans back from Venezuela is a good thing, then Biden getting seven Americans back from Venezuela in 2022 and ten more Americans back from Venezuela in 2023 must be a great thing.
Did you ever decide whether rescuing American hostages from Venezuela was a good thing or not?
If getting six Americans back from Venezuela is a good thing, then Biden getting seven Americans back from Venezuela in 2022 and ten more Americans back from Venezuela in 2023 must be a great thing.
Was getting the Drug trafficker Brittany Griner back for the Merchant of Death a good thing?
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.