Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Sally Vix wrote:

And my first golf instructors were Jimmy Demaret and Jackie Burke. Not too bad.

Hi, TxRunnerGirl!!! :)

Sally Vix wrote:

The law provides for prosecution for doctors who deny care for viable infants who are outside the womb.

You failed that test. You have never been viable. If you were viable you would not have been banned from Letsrun for two years.

Hi TX!!! wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

And my first golf instructors were Jimmy Demaret and Jackie Burke. Not too bad.

Hi, TxRunnerGirl!!! :)

Not sure why you think I am her. She is up in Portland or Seattle and I am in Houston. We are not the same person.

Sally Vix wrote:

Racket wrote:

Of course no is against this. As I pointed out, new born infants already receive medical care, and it's already illegal to kill them. The intent of this bill was to trigger sheep like you into thinking it was more than just a clever political ploy by Republicans to cast Democrats in a bad light.

The law provides for prosecution for doctors who deny care for viable infants who are outside the womb. Do you support this? Should doctors who deny health care to breathting babies living outside the womb be prosecuted? Please answer this.

Your question has no basis, it was already pointed out that it is already illegal to murder infants (as surely you knew). Since I already support existing law which protects such infants no I don’t have any reason to support this politically driven proposal. Your emotions are being deliberately aroused by your leaders in the GOP - you’ve been played but do keep us out of that thank you.

Sally Vix wrote:

Hi TX!!! wrote:

Hi, TxRunnerGirl!!! :)

Not sure why you think I am her. She is up in Portland or Seattle and I am in Houston. We are not the same person.

Your secret is safe here on these forums. ;-)

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

The law provides for prosecution for doctors who deny care for viable infants who are outside the womb. Do you support this? Should doctors who deny health care to breathting babies living outside the womb be prosecuted? Please answer this.

Your question has no basis, it was already pointed out that it is already illegal to murder infants (as surely you knew). Since I already support existing law which protects such infants no I don’t have any reason to support this politically driven proposal. Your emotions are being deliberately aroused by your leaders in the GOP - you’ve been played but do keep us out of that thank you.

Trollimator - you spew nonsense. Please refrain from responding to me in the future. Thanks in advance.

Expat wrote:

I see you guys have Flagpole's blood pressure up again today. One day you guys are going to cause him to have a massive heart attack.

Nope. I actually have low blood pressure always. I am not a Type A personality and have a benign condition that greatly protects me from any type of heart disease, so it is highly unlikely I will die of a heart attack. Cancer is way more likely to be the way for me.

Sally Vix wrote:

Racket wrote:

Of course no is against this. As I pointed out, new born infants already receive medical care, and it's already illegal to kill them. The intent of this bill was to trigger sheep like you into thinking it was more than just a clever political ploy by Republicans to cast Democrats in a bad light.

The law provides for prosecution for doctors who deny care for viable infants who are outside the womb. Do you support this? Should doctors who deny health care to breathting babies living outside the womb be prosecuted? Please answer this.

You keep suggesting that this bill applies to viable infants, but I haven't found anything indicating that is true. This includes the Wash. Post piece that you didn't link, but you retyped or cut and pasted in an earlier post. Understand that "viable" and "alive" are two very different things.

However, someone who is likely a whole lot more knowledgeable about this stuff than either you or I had this to say:

"It only happens in instances in which we know that the baby will not ultimately survive, and a choice has been pre-made to provide just comfort care" to the baby so the parents can be with it, said Dr. Colleen McNicholas, a fellow with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

So I guess the question that should be asked is whether you favor Washington politicians forcing a baby with no hope of survival to be hooked up to machines to maintain a heart beat that can not be maintained without artificial means?

Sally Vix wrote:

Trollimator - you spew nonsense. Please refrain from responding to me in the future. Thanks in advance.

This is really simple … except it your case it is not. Just ignore the posts you do not want to read.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

1) Everyone in the world reads this thread.

2) I am not 55.

3) I've gotten lots out of life...Fred Rogers taught me that he likes me just for being me, Bud Philson taught me to play air guitar, and some toasted naan with spicy red pepper hummus is one of the world's finer pleasures.

And my first golf instructors were Jimmy Demaret and Jackie Burke. Not too bad.

Oh...you're a golfer. THAT explains a lot.

Debating abortion is pointless. It’s impossible to have coherent rational debates with either side. They are too busy screaming at each other. It’s a knee jerk emotional debate that typically isn’t grounded in common sense.

There are already laws prohibiting killing infants. Abortion is a medical decision not a moral one. I 100% do not believe a women should be able to get an abortion “just cuz”. I believe you should be able to get an abortion at any time if the continued pregnancy would harm the mother or if the fetus isn’t viable. I believe in instances of rape etc you should be able to get an abortion.

Alan

America Keeps Winning.

49% > 47%.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/political_updates/prez_track_feb26

And since this thread is about Trump, would you support impeachment proceedings against Trump if it is determined that Trump was given financing by Russian Oligarchs paid into Cohen's Essential Consulting and then forwarded to Stormy Daniels to keep her quiet in the weeks leading up to the 2016 election?

Would you have any problem with that?

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

And my first golf instructors were Jimmy Demaret and Jackie Burke. Not too bad.

Oh...you're a golfer. THAT explains a lot.

WAS a golfer. And my highlights were when I was like 12. Golf is perhaps the most frustrating sport ever. DO NOT get into golf if you think you can be good without countless hours honing your craft. I gave it up about 5 years ago and do not miss it one iota.

Not to mention this is already an extreme edge case. Republicans would save a lot more lives if they got on board with some sensible gun control.

When it comes to school students getting shot up : "oh no nothing could be done!!!! So sad but these things happen!"

Some bizarre abortion surviving case (in which it's already illegal to kill a baby and babies are already entitled to health care at the hospital) : "This is an outrage!!!!!!!!"

Flagpole wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

And my first golf instructors were Jimmy Demaret and Jackie Burke. Not too bad.

Oh...you're a golfer. THAT explains a lot.

I heard that he has been playing golf for 30 years and hasn't learned to play using both hands.

L L wrote:

And since this thread is about Trump, would you support impeachment proceedings against Trump if it is determined that Trump was given financing by Russian Oligarchs paid into Cohen's Essential Consulting and then forwarded to Stormy Daniels to keep her quiet in the weeks leading up to the 2016 election?

Would you have any problem with that?

Not at all.

Runningart2004 wrote:

I 100% do not believe a women should be able to get an abortion “just cuz”.

Alan

Are you saying : "this is my personal belief which I recognize does not dictate law in the United States"

Runningart2004 wrote:

Debating abortion is pointless. It’s impossible to have coherent rational debates with either side. They are too busy screaming at each other. It’s a knee jerk emotional debate that typically isn’t grounded in common sense.

There are already laws prohibiting killing infants. Abortion is a medical decision not a moral one. I 100% do not believe a women should be able to get an abortion “just cuz”. I believe you should be able to get an abortion at any time if the continued pregnancy would harm the mother or if the fetus isn’t viable. I believe in instances of rape etc you should be able to get an abortion.

Alan

And you ignored the law. You lamely posted what Democrats spewed about the bill and neve offered up anything about what you think. You copied and pasted what Dems had to say. Alan, what do YOU THINK??? Should doctors be prosecuted for denying aid to living babies who survive botched abortions. Answer that Alan.