Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

I don't know about viable, but I think the law is about whether to leave some things up to doctor discretion on a case-by-case situation vs the government writing up procedures to follow for every medical situation.

I think it coincides with not forcing chemo on grandpa if he doesn't want it.

You can go down a whole path of writing you more and more regulations for doctors.

I thought conservatives liked less regulation.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

anotherdumbMFer wrote:

No you are sick for twisting facts. Pull your head of that FOX ass of yours

Senate Democrats are now on record for voting AGAINST providing medical care for babies who survive abortion. Democrats are the party of infanticide. Own it.

Just a minor suggestion, how about speaking to a doctor or trying to inform yourself of the issues outside of the FOX bubble? If you are actually interested in understanding this without bias there are avenues you can pursue.

L L wrote:

I don't know about viable, but I think the law is about whether to leave some things up to doctor discretion on a case-by-case situation vs the government writing up procedures to follow for every medical situation.

I think it coincides with not forcing chemo on grandpa if he doesn't want it.

You can go down a whole path of writing you more and more regulations for doctors.

I thought conservatives liked less regulation.

LL - that was pretty weak. Here is the question to YOU ... would you support denying health care to a baby who has been born as a viable infant?

signsofbrightness wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Senate Democrats are now on record for voting AGAINST providing medical care for babies who survive abortion. Democrats are the party of infanticide. Own it.

Just a minor suggestion, how about speaking to a doctor or trying to inform yourself of the issues outside of the FOX bubble? If you are actually interested in understanding this without bias there are avenues you can pursue.

And I posted the Washington Post article. But, you refuse to think and offer a cogent rebuttal and instead offer up the ill-informed retort so many liberals use of "blah blah blah - quit listening to Fox news."

Sally Vix wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Senate Democrats are now on record for voting AGAINST providing medical care for babies who survive abortion. Democrats are the party of infanticide. Own it.

I would like to ask all the liberals here, Flagpole, agip, Alan and everyone else if they think it is wrong to deny health care to viable babies who are living outside the womb. Guys? Let us know if you think it is wrong.

Trump tweets and you immediately believe him without doing any research on the matter. I will be happy to answer your question once you do your homework on the bill and come back and repost with an appropriate question.

Sally Vix wrote:

signsofbrightness wrote:

Just a minor suggestion, how about speaking to a doctor or trying to inform yourself of the issues outside of the FOX bubble? If you are actually interested in understanding this without bias there are avenues you can pursue.

And I posted the Washington Post article. But, you refuse to think and offer a cogent rebuttal and instead offer up the ill-informed retort so many liberals use of "blah blah blah - quit listening to Fox news."

You apparently missed the part where the Republican sponsors of the bill admit that the bill has nothing to do with health care to babies or "infanticide", but instead has everything to do with politics:

"Ahead of the vote, the bill’s Republican sponsors and outside anti-abortion groups lobbying for its passage made it clear that the intent of Monday’s vote was to undermine the growing pool of Senate Democrats running for president."

It's political grandstanding by the Republicans, nothing more, nothing less.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I would like to ask all the liberals here, Flagpole, agip, Alan and everyone else if they think it is wrong to deny health care to viable babies who are living outside the womb. Guys? Let us know if you think it is wrong.

Trump tweets and you immediately believe him without doing any research on the matter. I will be happy to answer your question once you do your homework on the bill and come back and repost with an appropriate question.

The libs refuse to answer the question. They support infanticide but won't say it.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I would like to ask all the liberals here, Flagpole, agip, Alan and everyone else if they think it is wrong to deny health care to viable babies who are living outside the womb. Guys? Let us know if you think it is wrong.

Trump tweets and you immediately believe him without doing any research on the matter. I will be happy to answer your question once you do your homework on the bill and come back and repost with an appropriate question.

Did you effing read the Washington Post story I linked to? I could effing care about Trump tweets. I never have followed Trump. Please address the Washington Post story I linked.

I don't effing read or watch Fox News. I don't read Trump's tweets. I read from the source. Address this: Are YOU okay with denying aid to an infant, a viable baby, who has been born? Simple question.

Trollminator wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

I would like to ask all the liberals here, Flagpole, agip, Alan and everyone else if they think it is wrong to deny health care to viable babies who are living outside the womb. Guys? Let us know if you think it is wrong.

Trump tweets and you immediately believe him without doing any research on the matter. I will be happy to answer your question once you do your homework on the bill and come back and repost with an appropriate question.

Don't hold your breath. He's the kind of idiot they specifically targeted with this bill. The authors never had any intention of it passing and probably don't even support it themselves, but they know the mouth breathers will herpty derp over it. It's like in Brave New World except instead of euphoric sex drugs they're given rage porn. Democrats aren't exactly innocent either as they know people will flock to the first whiff of social injustice they think might have maybe happened somewhere possibly

I see you guys have Flagpole's blood pressure up again today. One day you guys are going to cause him to have a massive heart attack.

Dr. Laura wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Ok. You got me. Let me add that to the list:

I play keyboards with two fingers (actually I would like to see that!)

I have never played music in front of an audience

I live in my Mom's basement

I either make $20 an hour or minimum wage or I am unemployable

I wear a name tag to work

I am a landscaper

I can never get a woman to love me or marry me

I will never have children because no woman would want to have my babies

I'm "dumbe"

Robert Mueller is my boyfriend

I'm sure there are other things, but that's all I have on this list at this time.

Feels good to come clean, doesn't it?

It would, but it's not really that clean down here in the basement...a bit moldy.

Sally Vix wrote:

Address this: Are YOU okay with denying aid to an infant, a viable baby, who has been born? Simple question.

Of course no is against this. As I pointed out, new born infants already receive medical care, and it's already illegal to kill them. The intent of this bill was to trigger sheep like you into thinking it was more than just a clever political ploy by Republicans to cast Democrats in a bad light.

Having Your Period wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Yeah, but he didn't call someone "dumbe". And, YOU need to set off the word "dumb". And I need to not start a sentence with a conjunction.

Bottom line though, if you call someone "dumb", better make sure to spell that word correctly. It's not like he made another random mistake.

You need to include the period INSIDE the quote.

You ain't no Brit.

Yep...still, random spelling and grammar issues are not the same as misspelling "dumb" when calling someone that. A person who does that deserves to be called out on it.

Racket wrote:

Sally Vix wrote:

Address this: Are YOU okay with denying aid to an infant, a viable baby, who has been born? Simple question.

Of course no is against this. As I pointed out, new born infants already receive medical care, and it's already illegal to kill them. The intent of this bill was to trigger sheep like you into thinking it was more than just a clever political ploy by Republicans to cast Democrats in a bad light.

The law provides for prosecution for doctors who deny care for viable infants who are outside the womb. Do you support this? Should doctors who deny health care to breathting babies living outside the womb be prosecuted? Please answer this.

1) Everyone in the world reads this thread.

2) I am not 55.

3) I've gotten lots out of life...Fred Rogers taught me that he likes me just for being me, Bud Philson taught me to play air guitar, and some toasted naan with spicy red pepper hummus is one of the world's finer pleasures.

Flagpole wrote:

Hani Saleem wrote:

wow, what a sad existence you have. this is what your life has come to, posting multiple times on a running forum thread that truly no one cares about and only a few would bother to read. 55 years old and that's what you've gotten out of life. sad.

1) Everyone in the world reads this thread.

2) I am not 55.

3) I've gotten lots out of life...Fred Rogers taught me that he likes me just for being me, Bud Philson taught me to play air guitar, and some toasted naan with spicy red pepper hummus is one of the world's finer pleasures.

And my first golf instructors were Jimmy Demaret and Jackie Burke. Not too bad.

Sally Vix wrote:

LL - that was pretty weak. Here is the question to YOU ... would you support denying health care to a baby who has been born as a viable infant?

You are using the term viable that I removed as a disclaimer in my response.

There are babies born with severe deformities that would make it very difficult to survive more than a couple weeks.

You could provide healthcare to get the baby through that period where it would still pass away.

You want to force the doctor to provide that care at great expense and emotional trauma to the parents.

I think there can be a subjective area where the doctor does not extend the life and allows the baby to pass naturally.

Flagpole wrote:

Having Your Period wrote:

You need to include the period INSIDE the quote.

You ain't no Brit.

Yep...still, random spelling and grammar issues are not the same as misspelling "dumb" when calling someone that. A person who does that deserves to be called out on it.

Nope. Ignorance of the rules of punctuation (you did it three times) "trumps" a likely typo.

I'm a teacher at heart.

You lose again.