agip wrote:
Another fake hate crime. LGBT activist burns down his (rented) home, collects $60k in sympathetic donations.
The fake ones are far more common than most people think.
https://reason.com/blog/2019/02/25/nikki-joly-fire-jackson-hoax-hate-crime
another bogus link by agip. surprise.
Racket wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Um...you don't read here very often if you believe Racket is a "Flagpole puppy boy". He's actually the best question-asker in this entire thread, and he does so to keep people honest. He's a bit skeptical of any declarations at this point in the process on either side (those sides are Right and Wrong, which are akin to Anti-Trump and Trump, NOT Democrat and Republican), and he's just looking for clarity from those who dare to make a declaration. He will be of the judiciary when all this is over, and he will be a fair and impartial judge. He didn't even know I knew this about him, but I did.
You though "Racket's Crush is..." didn't get it at all.
Flagpole, I'm flattered, really.
You are correct. I will be most judicious and very fair. If you are wrong I will point it out. You have provided plenty of clarification on your terms of Mueller arriving and the clown being done and if that does indeed occur then I will upload your prognostication and serve as witness to your correctness.
Hi Flagpole! Racket is his other handle.
agip wrote:
A second GOP senator says he will vote to the Great Trump National Emergency.
Two more to go. Tillis of NC. Collins of ME already declared.
I have to think Romney and Sasse will go against Trump here, and probably a couple more.
WIll GOP voters be embarassed that he has to veto a bipartisan rebuke from congress?
Nah - they like raw naked power. Especially if it is being spanked with a magazine with its picture on it.
Reminds me of how not one Democrat voted to impeach Clinton. Same thing, different party. Sadly you are clueless as to what the outcome will be. You did not think Trump would win 2 years ago, he did. Buckle up buttercup.
Flagpole wrote:
When Comey gave information out about Hillary Clinton during the campaign, that supposedly broke from tradition with the DOJ and FBI that they don't give information out about an investigation like that if the person wasn't indicted. Democrats say that has set a precedent and that they (Democrats) can use that to make the DOJ give up all the information that will be in the Mueller Report if they believe much has been hidden from them and from the public.
Well, THIS Democrat says NO to that.
We can't just hope to use a bad judgement to our advantage and hope to continue the bad judgement. That's not how things are supposed to work. That is not how integrity works.
The DOJ should decide for certain what their policy is and then abide by that until they decide AS A BODY that the policy has changed.
Now, there ARE other arguments to make to get the full report from the DOJ, but this precedent one is bad form.
Just one more example in a line of many that I don't just go with whatever the Democrats say. I am driven by truth, justice, and integrity at all times with no exceptions.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Bright, you aren't. Go back to your Yamaha kid's keyboard and keep practicing Mary had a Little Lamb, eventually you'll get it. What an ignorant post. Those you follow your advice are being lead to the river by the Pied Piper himself, unhinged Flagpole and his other handles. THAT was a dumb post.
Classic!!!!!! flagpole says they found nothing, so he must be blind and deaf. Watch this, 100% liar.
Fiagpole wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
When Comey gave information out about Hillary Clinton during the campaign, that supposedly broke from tradition with the DOJ and FBI that they don't give information out about an investigation like that if the person wasn't indicted. Democrats say that has set a precedent and that they (Democrats) can use that to make the DOJ give up all the information that will be in the Mueller Report if they believe much has been hidden from them and from the public.
Well, THIS Democrat says NO to that.
We can't just hope to use a bad judgement to our advantage and hope to continue the bad judgement. That's not how things are supposed to work. That is not how integrity works.
The DOJ should decide for certain what their policy is and then abide by that until they decide AS A BODY that the policy has changed.
Now, there ARE other arguments to make to get the full report from the DOJ, but this precedent one is bad form.
Just one more example in a line of many that I don't just go with whatever the Democrats say. I am driven by truth, justice, and integrity at all times with no exceptions.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Bright, you aren't. Go back to your Yamaha kid's keyboard and keep practicing Mary had a Little Lamb, eventually you'll get it. What an ignorant post. Those you follow your advice are being lead to the river by the Pied Piper himself, unhinged Flagpole and his other handles. THAT was a dumb post.
What's troubling about that post is that it was dumbe, but still is one of Flagpole's better posts. His bar is that low.
democrats lie wrote:
Classic!!!!!! flagpole says they found nothing, so he must be blind and deaf. Watch this, 100% liar.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Efe276Doht0
about their own side.
STOP IT NOW!!!!!! THIS IS GETTING OLD, REALLY FRICKING OLD!!!!!!!
You are clearly bringing up facts with Hillary Clinton clearly lying and caught over and over. You know damn well that Democrats don't like that and will spin it accordingly to stick with ripping apart the President of the United States of America.
I think they should just move to another country, but regardless, your video will really stir them up. Be prepared for an onslaught of fake links about our President. 3, 2, 1...
The Fokus wrote:
Not sure how much he [Cohen] can give up because of the Mueller investigation and he's reportedly talking with SDNY on a related case. I can't imagine he's free to talk publicly on any topics involved in either of those investigations.
There are closed sessions where he may be able to tell more and then the public session.
In the first closed session they may be able to determine what kind of questions he can answer publicly.
And I think there may be a ton of things they did together that was not in the scope of the Mueller probe that can be asked.
Also, there are documents that can corroborate things he may say.
Cohen knows a lot of secrets.
And don't forget, we haven't talked about this in months, but Trump's CFO of many years has been cooperating as well.
Trump's red line of personal finances is going to get smeared.
Sally Vix wrote:
What's troubling about that post is that it was dumbe, but still is one of Flagpole's better posts. His bar is that low.
If you're gonna call someone dumb then for the love of God make sure you spell it correctly first.
I'm just afraid Trump may send in Pentageli's brother to the hearing.
Sally Vix wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
Like always and like most people you miss the details. I’ll let you research some more. Just stay off Fox News.
Alan
Alan, Why not just point out the errors in what he said? This IS Infanticide and quite sickening.
This is from the Washington Post:
Senate blocks bill on medical care for children born alive after attempted abortion
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
By Mike DeBonis and
Felicia Sonmez February 25 at 9:41 PM
The Senate voted Monday to block consideration of a measure that would punish any doctor who fails to provide medical care to a child born alive after an attempted abortion.
All but three Democrats voted against a procedural motion on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, denying it the necessary 60 votes to proceed. The final vote count was 53 in favor and 44 opposed.
The bill would require a health-care practitioner to “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child” as he or she would to “any other child born alive at the same gestational age.” The bill includes criminal penalties, a right of civil action for an affected mother and a mandatory reporting requirement for other health providers.
Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has sought to put Democrats — and 2020 candidates in particular — on the record on the issue after recent comments made by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D). McConnell also plans to hold a vote in the coming weeks on the Green New Deal climate change legislation as he has cast the Democrats as extreme.
In remarks on the Senate floor ahead of Monday’s vote, McConnell described the measure as “a straightforward piece of legislation to protect newborn babies.” Democrats, he argued, “seem to be suggesting that newborn babies’ right to life may be contingent on the circumstances surrounding their birth.”
This:
"Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution."
It's also already a felony to kill infants....
Alan
What are the current odds that Cohen will be charged with lying to Congress re: his testimony this week.
Correcting misspellings on a message board is a game for losers.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Alan, Why not just point out the errors in what he said? This IS Infanticide and quite sickening.
This is from the Washington Post:
Senate blocks bill on medical care for children born alive after attempted abortion
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
By Mike DeBonis and
Felicia Sonmez February 25 at 9:41 PM
The Senate voted Monday to block consideration of a measure that would punish any doctor who fails to provide medical care to a child born alive after an attempted abortion.
All but three Democrats voted against a procedural motion on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, denying it the necessary 60 votes to proceed. The final vote count was 53 in favor and 44 opposed.
The bill would require a health-care practitioner to “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child” as he or she would to “any other child born alive at the same gestational age.” The bill includes criminal penalties, a right of civil action for an affected mother and a mandatory reporting requirement for other health providers.
Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has sought to put Democrats — and 2020 candidates in particular — on the record on the issue after recent comments made by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D). McConnell also plans to hold a vote in the coming weeks on the Green New Deal climate change legislation as he has cast the Democrats as extreme.
In remarks on the Senate floor ahead of Monday’s vote, McConnell described the measure as “a straightforward piece of legislation to protect newborn babies.” Democrats, he argued, “seem to be suggesting that newborn babies’ right to life may be contingent on the circumstances surrounding their birth.”
This:
"Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution."
It's also already a felony to kill infants....
Alan
Damn, you beat me to it. The intention of this bill was to outlaw something that was already outlawed, but had slightly different language so that idiots would gobble it up and spread it around Facebook and other social media sites as "HURR DERRRR LIBTARDS WANNA KILL BABIES"
So congrats to everyone who fell for the legislative equivalent of fake news
Embarrassment of Riches wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
You people get it wrong all the time. I didn't say I have made hundreds of thousands of dollars. I said I paid for my house and music gear and then some. While my house is NOW worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, that was not the purchase price nor what I have paid for it. It is a tad less than "Hundreds of thousands if dollars".
Regarding the rest of my music stuff, I truly have played paying gigs for over 30 years, mostly in blues and rock bands. No fraud.
Here is the stuff to focus on...I AM one of the top 50 piano players in the world, and I have HUGE biceps. You KNOW it to be true also.
Just stop. dude. You are embarrassing yourself.
You've never played in front of an audience. You are a lying fraud. It's been proven and you admitted it. Move on.
???
I have not admitted that?
Been playing in bands and doing solo and session work for over 30 years.
switcheroooo wrote:
Racket wrote:
Flagpole, I'm flattered, really.
You are correct. I will be most judicious and very fair. If you are wrong I will point it out. You have provided plenty of clarification on your terms of Mueller arriving and the clown being done and if that does indeed occur then I will upload your prognostication and serve as witness to your correctness.
Hi Flagpole! Racket is his other handle.
Nope!
WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!
Racket wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
What's troubling about that post is that it was dumbe, but still is one of Flagpole's better posts. His bar is that low.
If you're gonna call someone dumb then for the love of God make sure you spell it correctly first.
Word.
Flagpole wrote:
Embarrassment of Riches wrote:
Just stop. dude. You are embarrassing yourself.
You've never played in front of an audience. You are a lying fraud. It's been proven and you admitted it. Move on.
???
I have not admitted that?
Been playing in bands and doing solo and session work for over 30 years.
Your new blues nickname is either One Armed Willy or Two Finger Flagpole.
You are a fraud. It has been proven.
Hani Saleem wrote:
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/24/trey_gowdy_to_andrew_mccabe_if_you_really_believed_trump_was_an_agent_of_russia_why_did_you_tell_cbs_and_not_congress.htmlI'm a disorganized liberal. This is the link.
You know you have successfully trigged the Trumpeleo embreds when they use your screen name and revert back to "But Hillary! Whaaaaa!"
And just think I only stop by ever now and then while you turds live here.
Carry on.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Alan, Why not just point out the errors in what he said? This IS Infanticide and quite sickening.
This is from the Washington Post:
Senate blocks bill on medical care for children born alive after attempted abortion
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.). (Jacquelyn Martin/AP)
By Mike DeBonis and
Felicia Sonmez February 25 at 9:41 PM
The Senate voted Monday to block consideration of a measure that would punish any doctor who fails to provide medical care to a child born alive after an attempted abortion.
All but three Democrats voted against a procedural motion on the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act, denying it the necessary 60 votes to proceed. The final vote count was 53 in favor and 44 opposed.
The bill would require a health-care practitioner to “exercise the same degree of professional skill, care, and diligence to preserve the life and health of the child” as he or she would to “any other child born alive at the same gestational age.” The bill includes criminal penalties, a right of civil action for an affected mother and a mandatory reporting requirement for other health providers.
Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has sought to put Democrats — and 2020 candidates in particular — on the record on the issue after recent comments made by Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam (D). McConnell also plans to hold a vote in the coming weeks on the Green New Deal climate change legislation as he has cast the Democrats as extreme.
In remarks on the Senate floor ahead of Monday’s vote, McConnell described the measure as “a straightforward piece of legislation to protect newborn babies.” Democrats, he argued, “seem to be suggesting that newborn babies’ right to life may be contingent on the circumstances surrounding their birth.”
This:
"Opponents of the bill argued that it represented an unjustified attack on abortion rights, preventing doctors from exercising their best medical judgment and exposing them to possible lawsuits or prosecution."
It's also already a felony to kill infants....
Alan
Forget what the opponents of the bill are saying. That is standard liberal mumbo jumbo. Did you read what the bill actually does? It forces doctors to provide care for babies born alive. Please read that again. It ensures that babies born alive are given health care. How can you be against that???