Let me clarify: no intelligent people like Democrat policies because most of their policies are stupid.
zo....why have the Dems won every popular vote but one since oh the 1980s? You'd think if no intelligent people like Dem policies that would not happen.
Let me clarify: no intelligent people like Democrat policies because most of their policies are stupid.
zo....why have the Dems won every popular vote but one since oh the 1980s? You'd think if no intelligent people like Dem policies that would not happen.
They didn't win the popular vote in 1980 or 1984 or 1988 or 1992 or 1996 or 2008.
You really need to stop getting all of your information from other stupid people.
zo....why have the Dems won every popular vote but one since oh the 1980s? You'd think if no intelligent people like Dem policies that would not happen.
They didn't win the popular vote in 1980 or 1984 or 1988 or 1992 or 1996 or 2008.
You really need to stop getting all of your information from other stupid people.
I wrote 'since' the 1980s so the 80s are out.
huh what Bush1 beat Clinton in the popular vote in 92?
huh what Dole beat Clinton in the popular vote in 96?
huh what mccain beat obama in the popular vote in 08?
I think the election you are searching for is 04, when bush 2 beat kerry in the popular.
that's the one time Rs won the popular vote.
You have reached a new level of stupidity and ignorance. I wait with baited breath to see how you explain this one.
Let me clarify: no intelligent people like Democrat policies because most of their policies are stupid.
zo....why have the Dems won every popular vote but one since oh the 1980s? You'd think if no intelligent people like Dem policies that would not happen.
They didn't win the popular vote in 1980 or 1984 or 1988 or 1992 or 1996 or 2008.
You really need to stop getting all of your information from other stupid people.
I wrote 'since' the 1980s so the 80s are out.
huh what Bush1 beat Clinton in the popular vote in 92?
huh what Dole beat Clinton in the popular vote in 96?
huh what mccain beat obama in the popular vote in 08?
I think the election you are searching for is 04, when bush 2 beat kerry in the popular.
that's the one time Rs won the popular vote.
You have reached a new level of stupidity and ignorance. I wait with baited breath to see how you explain this one.
I don't think winning the popular vote in 4 of the last 7 or 4 of the last 11 is the dunk you think it is.
The country shifts back and forth all the time.
You didn't say the republicans won the popular vote you said the Democrats won the popular vote. Democrats did not win the popular vote in 1992 or 1996. Democrats did not win the popular vote in 2004. I meant '04 not '08 obviously the Dems won in 2008 when every idiot alive crawled out of the muck to vote for Barry.
zo....why have the Dems won every popular vote but one since oh the 1980s? You'd think if no intelligent people like Dem policies that would not happen.
47% of Americans pay no federal income tax.
39% of Americans are under 18 years old or over 65 years old.
Let me clarify: no intelligent people like Democrat policies because most of their policies are stupid.
zo....why have the Dems won every popular vote but one since oh the 1980s? You'd think if no intelligent people like Dem policies that would not happen.
Lots of people used to enjoy watching Hee Haw. Were those people intelligent?
huh what Bush1 beat Clinton in the popular vote in 92?
huh what Dole beat Clinton in the popular vote in 96?
huh what mccain beat obama in the popular vote in 08?
I think the election you are searching for is 04, when bush 2 beat kerry in the popular.
that's the one time Rs won the popular vote.
You have reached a new level of stupidity and ignorance. I wait with baited breath to see how you explain this one.
I don't think winning the popular vote in 4 of the last 7 or 4 of the last 11 is the dunk you think it is.
The country shifts back and forth all the time.
You didn't say the republicans won the popular vote you said the Democrats won the popular vote. Democrats did not win the popular vote in 1992 or 1996. Democrats did not win the popular vote in 2004. I meant '04 not '08 obviously the Dems won in 2008 when every idiot alive crawled out of the muck to vote for Barry.
Are you really that stup!d? Just an act?
There have been 8 POTUS elections since 1990 (which is the time period agip specified). The Dems have won 7 of those 8 which is EXACTLY what agip claimed. And you come back with "4 of the last 7"?!?
WTF is the matter with you? Learning challenged?
Hey, no worries, you could still be a wonderful person . . . only, you're pretty much the exact opposite.
“Won the popular vote” was the statement. That does not require more than 50%. There’s no ambiguity in that. Try again.
When your argument is that the country prefers the Democrat it's rather important that you break the 50% threshold.
43% of the country voting for Clinton in 1992 does NOT mean the country preferred the Democrat it means 57% of the country didn't.
Lol. The statement, clear as day, was that they won the popular vote. Not that they received a majority of votes. Those are not synonymous statements and even someone as dumb as you knows it.
When your argument is that the country prefers the Democrat it's rather important that you break the 50% threshold.
43% of the country voting for Clinton in 1992 does NOT mean the country preferred the Democrat it means 57% of the country didn't.
Lol. The statement, clear as day, was that they won the popular vote. Not that they received a majority of votes. Those are not synonymous statements and even someone as dumb as you knows it.
There's a clear inference in the statement.
Apparently someone as dumb as you can't figure this out.
Lol. The statement, clear as day, was that they won the popular vote. Not that they received a majority of votes. Those are not synonymous statements and even someone as dumb as you knows it.
There's a clear inference in the statement.
Apparently someone as dumb as you can't figure this out.
Lol this is as embarrassing as the Alabama up 2 scores because it’s 2 field goals claim and several other gaffes from you in that game. You’re slipping.
Apparently someone as dumb as you can't figure this out.
Lol this is as embarrassing as the Alabama up 2 scores because it’s 2 field goals claim and several other gaffes from you in that game. You’re slipping.
I thought they were up 10 at one point when I made that comment. Not my finest hour.
There's a clear and obvious inference in the statement and you know it.
Lol this is as embarrassing as the Alabama up 2 scores because it’s 2 field goals claim and several other gaffes from you in that game. You’re slipping.
I thought they were up 10 at one point when I made that comment. Not my finest hour.
There's a clear and obvious inference in the statement and you know it.
You also thought Alabama would win by 30. You also thought that they were up the entire second half. You also thought their RB averaged 7.7 yards per carry after 14 carries.
This is just another example in the last few days of my original statement: factual accuracy isn’t your thing 🤷♂️
Lol this is as embarrassing as the Alabama up 2 scores because it’s 2 field goals claim and several other gaffes from you in that game. You’re slipping.
I thought they were up 10 at one point when I made that comment. Not my finest hour.
Stuff like that happens, I wouldn’t sweat it. Now, saying “it was 2 scores - 2 field goals!” to try to justify it? That’s straight beta.