Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

and not the curious wording: "the liberal politico"

Sometimes I swear that right wingers think the media are biased because they don't understand the difference between opinion pieces and news pieces. It's beyond stupid.

agip wrote:

and not the curious wording: "the liberal politico"

Sometimes I swear that right wingers think the media are biased because they don't understand the difference between opinion pieces and news pieces. It's beyond stupid.

trillions vs billions wrote:

I'd love to see the cost/benefit analysis for "The green new deal".

Since the Green New Deal is a non-binding resolution, it contains no appropriations and the cost is zero.

But the cost of doing nothing is mind-boggling. If you want to see the cost the nation has already incurred due to climate change, and the future cost, you should look no further than the Trump Administration's own figures.

They tried to bury the National Climate Assessment by moving the release date to Black Friday. So you probably didn't hear about it because you were out shopping or watching football.

agip wrote:

Keep America Great 2020 wrote:

Even the liberal politico recognizes President Trump has a great chance of winning in the Supreme Court.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/02/19/trump-national-emergency-border-wall-225164

Here's a tip: Opinion pieces aren't news pieces.

As an aside - everyone should note that conservatives always post opinion pieces rather than news pieces. Because facts get in their way - they need to use opinion rather than fact to feel better about their positions. Snowflakes.

Here's a tip: Just because your liberal "news" sources tell you somethings a "fact" doesn't mean it is. It's often an opinion disguised to look like "facts" for the easily fooled liberals like yourself.

For example, the "fact checkers" of the media who like to attack President Trump often insert their own opinions and biases into their "fact checking". It's honestly quite humorous. The fact checkers now need to be fact-checked. That's the times we are living in.

President Trump wrote:

agip wrote:

and not the curious wording: "the liberal politico"

Sometimes I swear that right wingers think the media are biased because they don't understand the difference between opinion pieces and news pieces. It's beyond stupid.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-harvard-study-cnn-nbc-trump-coverage-93-percent-negative

Hope those FACTS don't upset you agip.

When is mueller going to escort trump out of the white house in handcuffs????

Hahahahahaha!!!!

Mueller?

Mueller??

Mueller???

Democrats lose again!!!

'Official LRC thread for fools who believe DT is president of the USA'

You're fired!

Keep America Great 2020 wrote:

Even the liberal politico recognizes President Trump has a great chance of winning in the Supreme Court.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/02/19/trump-national-emergency-border-wall-225164

I actually agree. We don't know how SCOTUS will rule on this one.

agip wrote:

and not the curious wording: "the liberal politico"

Sometimes I swear that right wingers think the media are biased because they don't understand the difference between opinion pieces and news pieces. It's beyond stupid.

I agree with that too.

Fat hurts wrote:

trillions vs billions wrote:

I'd love to see the cost/benefit analysis for "The green new deal".

Since the Green New Deal is a non-binding resolution, it contains no appropriations and the cost is zero.

But the cost of doing nothing is mind-boggling. If you want to see the cost the nation has already incurred due to climate change, and the future cost, you should look no further than the Trump Administration's own figures.

They tried to bury the National Climate Assessment by moving the release date to Black Friday. So you probably didn't hear about it because you were out shopping or watching football.

https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/

Thanks for the reading Al Gore - I'll get right on that!

President Trump wrote:

agip wrote:

Here's a tip: Opinion pieces aren't news pieces.

As an aside - everyone should note that conservatives always post opinion pieces rather than news pieces. Because facts get in their way - they need to use opinion rather than fact to feel better about their positions. Snowflakes.

Here's a tip: Just because your liberal "news" sources tell you somethings a "fact" doesn't mean it is. It's often an opinion disguised to look like "facts" for the easily fooled liberals like yourself.

For example, the "fact checkers" of the media who like to attack President Trump often insert their own opinions and biases into their "fact checking". It's honestly quite humorous. The fact checkers now need to be fact-checked. That's the times we are living in.

The fact checkers always provide the rationale for the judgements they make. You can dispute that rationale if you want, but usually they are correct.

Greg wrote:

'Official LRC thread for fools who believe DT is president of the USA'

You're fired!

So, you're saying you live in denial Greg?

Fat hurts wrote:

President Trump wrote:

Here's a tip: Just because your liberal "news" sources tell you somethings a "fact" doesn't mean it is. It's often an opinion disguised to look like "facts" for the easily fooled liberals like yourself.

For example, the "fact checkers" of the media who like to attack President Trump often insert their own opinions and biases into their "fact checking". It's honestly quite humorous. The fact checkers now need to be fact-checked. That's the times we are living in.

The fact checkers always provide the rationale for the judgements they make. You can dispute that rationale if you want, but usually they are correct.

Fact checkers insert their own opinions about 25% of the time.

In addition, they for some strange reason fact check conservatives with an intense vigor whereas seem to slack in fact checking for liberals. I wonder why....

a CONVIENENT TRUTH wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Since the Green New Deal is a non-binding resolution, it contains no appropriations and the cost is zero.

But the cost of doing nothing is mind-boggling. If you want to see the cost the nation has already incurred due to climate change, and the future cost, you should look no further than the Trump Administration's own figures.

They tried to bury the National Climate Assessment by moving the release date to Black Friday. So you probably didn't hear about it because you were out shopping or watching football.

https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/

Thanks for the reading Al Gore - I'll get right on that!

That report was published by the Trump Administration.

Democrats lose again wrote:

When is mueller going to escort trump out of the white house in handcuffs????

Hahahahahaha!!!!

Mueller?

Mueller??

Mueller???

Democrats lose again!!!

Give them another 10 years. The investigation is just beginning according to that clown on here. LOL

Keep America Great 2020 wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

The fact checkers always provide the rationale for the judgements they make. You can dispute that rationale if you want, but usually they are correct.

Fact checkers insert their own opinions about 25% of the time.

In addition, they for some strange reason fact check conservatives with an intense vigor whereas seem to slack in fact checking for liberals. I wonder why....

Really? So if fact checkers are biased then there must be some conservative fact checkers out there somewhere.

Which is which?

Fat hurts wrote:

Keep America Great 2020 wrote:

Fact checkers insert their own opinions about 25% of the time.

In addition, they for some strange reason fact check conservatives with an intense vigor whereas seem to slack in fact checking for liberals. I wonder why....

Really? So if fact checkers are biased then there must be some conservative fact checkers out there somewhere.

Which is which?

There is obviously a vast different in the number of liberal "news" sources and the number of conservative news sources.

Keep America Great 2020 wrote:

There is obviously a vast different in the number of liberal "news" sources and the number of conservative news sources.

Which tells you that YOU are the losing team.

Keep America Great 2020 wrote:

Runningart2004 wrote:Was a national emergency declared in order to secure funding for Obamacare? Or did that go through the normal legislative process?

Alan

You don't consider illegal aliens, drugs, prostitution, and murder an emergency? Serious question.

You really don’t have any friends or hobbies do you? lurking here 24/7 demonstrating your knowledge of... nothing. And the obsession with manly flagpole is very telling. Might be best to just come out of the closet on this thread. We are providing you with a safe space to do that. Hope you take my advice