Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
SDSU Aztec wrote:
nontrumper wrote:
Democrats and Republicans voted for a bill to fund fencing on parts of the border. Right or wrong. But comparing it to Trump's vision of a wall is not comparing apples to apples. Both parties do agree on border security, but how to do it is not always agreed upon. It's a hot button political issue. Most drugs are smuggled through ports of entry, flown in, or along coastal areas. Most known terrorists have arrived in the US via the Canadian border. Why not build a wall up north? The 9/11 terrorists mostly flew into the US or crossed via Canada.
Again, why didn't Republicans vote to fully fund the wall when they controlled both the House and Senate?
That's a simple question and Trumpers continue to avoid it.
The fencing approved by Democrats was budgeted at $5M per mile and Trump wants $25 per mile so, no, Democrats did not want the "Wall"
So yes, the Democrats did want the Wall. Your ability to recall simple facts sucks! You only scour the internet looking for anything on Trump.
Flagpole wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Nobody dares to answer my questions about the vanity wall.
Why was there no emergency a year ago?
Why was there no emergency two years ago?
If this has been a national emergency for so long then Individual-1 should be impeached for the high crime of endangering our nation by his dereliction of duty.
CORRECT!
Funny how Democrats do the same thing. Was there no urgency for National Healthcare. Hillary, no. Hillary, yes. Obama, no. Obama, yes.
Cherry picking liberals. You thought you made a great point Fats, but truthfully, you didn't.
30 mo wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Music appreciation is subjective, but I've played professionally for more than 30 years...solo, in bands, session work, keyboards, guitar, singing...classically trained.
You’ve been playing for 30 years and all you been able to come up with was that steaming pile of sh!t?
At least learn how to play keyboards with more than two fingers.
Agreed. You aren't in the top 50 piano players in your trailer park in Ohio. I know many people who are outstanding piano players yet they'd never boast of being the top 50. You are one of the most INSECURE AND NARCISSISTIC I'VE ever come across in my life. Please don't venture out much into the world, it won't be prepared for someone like you.
Puny biceps and you absolutely stink at piano. I thought I'd be listening and posting a great job to Flagpole, but that would be lying. You aren't even close to being good. Give it up and start actually lifting weights chubby.
fats hurts wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
CORRECT!
Funny how Democrats do the same thing. Was there no urgency for National Healthcare. Hillary, no. Hillary, yes. Obama, no. Obama, yes.
Cherry picking liberals. You thought you made a great point Fats, but truthfully, you didn't.
Haven't you heard? The same rules don't apply for the special snowflake liberals. Trump is always evil and the liberals are trying to save us from this "divided country" we live in.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
fats hurts wrote:
Funny how Democrats do the same thing. Was there no urgency for National Healthcare. Hillary, no. Hillary, yes. Obama, no. Obama, yes.
Cherry picking liberals. You thought you made a great point Fats, but truthfully, you didn't.
Haven't you heard? The same rules don't apply for the special snowflake liberals. Trump is always evil and the liberals are trying to save us from this "divided country" we live in.
Was a national emergency declared in order to secure funding for Obamacare? Or did that go through the normal legislative process?
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:Was a national emergency declared in order to secure funding for Obamacare? Or did that go through the normal legislative process?
Alan
You just compared Obamacare to illegal immigration. Let that sink in.
Runningart2004 wrote:Was a national emergency declared in order to secure funding for Obamacare? Or did that go through the normal legislative process?
Alan
You don't consider illegal aliens, drugs, prostitution, and murder an emergency? Serious question.
Trump has set a precedent for future presidents.....if my agenda fails the normal legislative process I can just declare a national emergency to secure funding.
Alan
I'll take that as a no then. You don't consider illegal aliens, drugs, prostitution, and murder an emergency. If you take off your Trump-hating goggles, maybe you'd get a clearer understanding of what is really going on.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
I'll take that as a no then. You don't consider illegal aliens, drugs, prostitution, and murder an emergency. If you take off your Trump-hating goggles, maybe you'd get a clearer understanding of what is really going on.
we have the lowest crime rates now since what - the 1960s? 1950s? So no, not an emergency. In fact the nation is kicking butt in crime fighting. The opposite of an emergency.
by the way, all dictators seize power by saying there is an emergency, so just overlook their power grab so he can take care of it. There's always a kernel of truth to it - so suckers like you will let the dictator take charge.
Then, yeah, we have Venezuela. Because of people like you looking the other way when leaders seize power.
Not sure why any of us continue debating with such a simpleton, but I'll give it another go... the vast, vast, vast majority of drugs enter the US via established border crossings, are flown in, or arrive by boat/ship. Trump's wall will not stop the flow of drugs. Nor will stop the flow of sex trade workers. Although I spend no time worrying about being murdered, if I were killed, it's almost certain it'll be an American citizen, born and raised.
And although I understand the need for border security, the reality is our economy is actually boosted by undocumented immigrants. Who is picking your produce and processing your meat?
agip wrote:we have the lowest crime rates now since what - the 1960s? 1950s? So no, not an emergency. In fact the nation is kicking butt in crime fighting. The opposite of an emergency.
Okay, so there ins't enough murders, drugs, sex trafficking, and illegals in this country for you to consider it an emergency. How many does it take to be an emergency for you?
P.S. Having lower numbers of crime now that in the past doesn't make it not an emergency TODAY. That is a very weak argument, and fails to address the crime that IS occurring due to illegals that should not even be in our country.
Sorry angel moms and dads, the murders of your sons and daughters don't matter because liberals like "agip" don't think it's a big deal. Sad.
nontrumper wrote:
Not sure why any of us continue debating with such a simpleton, but I'll give it another go... the vast, vast, vast majority of drugs enter the US via established border crossings.
Simpleton? You literally just proved yourself a simpleton by this pathetic argument.
"The majority of drugs enter the US at border crossings."
How could you possibly know this? You have know idea that is true because guess what genius, we have no clue how many drugs are crossing our borders illegally where there is no wall. That's why they call it ILLEGAL immigration. They get through undetected. If the illegal aliens are undetected, guess what genius, so are the drugs.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
agip wrote:we have the lowest crime rates now since what - the 1960s? 1950s? So no, not an emergency. In fact the nation is kicking butt in crime fighting. The opposite of an emergency.
Okay, so there ins't enough murders, drugs, sex trafficking, and illegals in this country for you to consider it an emergency. How many does it take to be an emergency for you?
P.S. Having lower numbers of crime now that in the past doesn't make it not an emergency TODAY. That is a very weak argument, and fails to address the crime that IS occurring due to illegals that should not even be in our country.
Sorry angel moms and dads, the murders of your sons and daughters don't matter because liberals like "agip" don't think it's a big deal. Sad.
Is it ok for the WH to grab power and shred the constitution if there is 1 murder? 2? 100? At what point do you approve of the WH taking emergency powers? How many murders? Serious question.
agip wrote:
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Okay, so there ins't enough murders, drugs, sex trafficking, and illegals in this country for you to consider it an emergency. How many does it take to be an emergency for you?
P.S. Having lower numbers of crime now that in the past doesn't make it not an emergency TODAY. That is a very weak argument, and fails to address the crime that IS occurring due to illegals that should not even be in our country.
Sorry angel moms and dads, the murders of your sons and daughters don't matter because liberals like "agip" don't think it's a big deal. Sad.
Is it ok for the WH to grab power and shred the constitution if there is 1 murder? 2? 100? At what point do you approve of the WH taking emergency powers? How many murders? Serious question.
Declaring a national emergency is not "shredding" the constitution. Obama declared 12 national emergencies. It is within the power of the President to do so.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
agip wrote:
Is it ok for the WH to grab power and shred the constitution if there is 1 murder? 2? 100? At what point do you approve of the WH taking emergency powers? How many murders? Serious question.
Declaring a national emergency is not "shredding" the constitution. Obama declared 12 national emergencies. It is within the power of the President to do so.
I'll put it another way so you can't divert.
What do you think the murder count threshold is for a president to take over the power of the purse from congress.
Round number.
agip wrote:
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
Declaring a national emergency is not "shredding" the constitution. Obama declared 12 national emergencies. It is within the power of the President to do so.
I'll put it another way so you can't divert.
What do you think the murder count threshold is for a president to take over the power of the purse from congress.
Round number.
See above. I already asked you this question earlier. You have yet to reply.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
agip wrote:
I'll put it another way so you can't divert.
What do you think the murder count threshold is for a president to take over the power of the purse from congress.
Round number.
See above. I already asked you this question earlier. You have yet to reply.
you may not be aware that no president ever has declared an emergency to deliberately go around congress.
we now know you are exactly the kind of low-commitment democrat who looks the other way when a leader subverts a democracy. People like you existed in all the socialist states of the Warsaw Pact - you caused all that. People like you.
Keep America Great 2020 wrote:
agip wrote:
I'll put it another way so you can't divert.
What do you think the murder count threshold is for a president to take over the power of the purse from congress.
Round number.
See above. I already asked you this question earlier. You have yet to reply.
Ship is just trying to trap you in a gotcha moment.
You come back with a number and he’ll say something like why doesn’t trump declare an emergency for gun violence.