Trolling for dollars... wrote:
Hey, I'm the 500th respondent on this thread, do I win a prize?
If you were the 10,000th poster on the other thread you would get as huge prize.
Trolling for dollars... wrote:
Hey, I'm the 500th respondent on this thread, do I win a prize?
If you were the 10,000th poster on the other thread you would get as huge prize.
As a D.O. wrote:
Agreed. Never thought I would be able to anger the libs so much that so many of them were reduced to middle school children with the inability to counter any points. Save for a couple of posters, I've singlehandedly made people change their handle, make wild assumptions about me, and actually even start talking to each other about me. The best part is that it is that easy to turn them into the very type of people they incorrectly assume all Trump supporters are. My work here is done.
Hypocrisy thy name is you Libs.
Nice one. You failed to make a single point other than to stroke your own fragile ego.
The whole thing is depressing and frustrating and.....
But at least one aspect is clear to me: If you dislike/hate one of them more than the other, OK, I can see that. HOWEVER, given all that we've seen and heard, if you're actually ENTHUSIASTIC about either of them you should be embarrassed. Really embarrassed. Yeah, I know, I just called a huge chunk of the US "embarrassing." But I'm afraid it's true. A testament to how folks value "being on a side" over making honest assessments. Pathetic.
Obviousness wrote:
The whole thing is depressing and frustrating and.....
But at least one aspect is clear to me: If you dislike/hate one of them more than the other, OK, I can see that. HOWEVER, given all that we've seen and heard, if you're actually ENTHUSIASTIC about either of them you should be embarrassed. Really embarrassed. Yeah, I know, I just called a huge chunk of the US "embarrassing." But I'm afraid it's true. A testament to how folks value "being on a side" over making honest assessments. Pathetic.
Don't think that you "just called a huge chunk of the US 'embarrassing.'" I don't know if I've ever seen anyone who is enthusiastic about either candidate. I've only seen lots of people who HATE!!! one or the other. The only real enthusiasm is hatred.
Not Embarrassed wrote:
Obviousness wrote:The whole thing is depressing and frustrating and.....
But at least one aspect is clear to me: If you dislike/hate one of them more than the other, OK, I can see that. HOWEVER, given all that we've seen and heard, if you're actually ENTHUSIASTIC about either of them you should be embarrassed. Really embarrassed. Yeah, I know, I just called a huge chunk of the US "embarrassing." But I'm afraid it's true. A testament to how folks value "being on a side" over making honest assessments. Pathetic.
Don't think that you "just called a huge chunk of the US 'embarrassing.'" I don't know if I've ever seen anyone who is enthusiastic about either candidate. I've only seen lots of people who HATE!!! one or the other. The only real enthusiasm is hatred.
DiscoGary is enthusiastic about Trump.
But I agree, being enthusiastic about either of these two is a sign of having some serious issues one way or another.
Obviousness wrote:
The whole thing is depressing and frustrating and.....
But at least one aspect is clear to me: If you dislike/hate one of them more than the other, OK, I can see that. HOWEVER, given all that we've seen and heard, if you're actually ENTHUSIASTIC about either of them you should be embarrassed. Really embarrassed. Yeah, I know, I just called a huge chunk of the US "embarrassing." But I'm afraid it's true. A testament to how folks value "being on a side" over making honest assessments. Pathetic.
Here is something I can get behind. I've never met anyone on either side of this election who actually thinks either one will be a good president. Not including the completely retarded folks on each side that news outlets attempt to seek out for shits and giggles.
o'lahrety wrote:
Sorry brother, but you've not made much of an argument for discussing, so it's only the trolls with nothing better to do who are attacking you.
Using a legal team to make sure you don't pay any more taxes than you are required? Yeah, I have no problem with that. Releasing his returns may highlight the need for tax reform, though.
I don't agree with your notion that Trump is a pinnacle of health and Hillary is on her death bed, and the debate supported my view on that more than yours.
You also gave nothing to support your claim that Hillary is a "liar, fraud, failure, and woman riding on her husbands coat tails can continue the downward spiral of the country." Not exactly hard-hitting debate material.
Then of course the embarrassment of acting holier-than-thou in regards to grammar and subsequently slipping up yourself.
In short, you haven't really offered up anything worth having a meaningful conversation about, and you shouldn't be surprised by the responses.
I'm not surprised, they are the type of responses I expect from most libs. Not all, most.
-If you need me to point out why HRC is a liar, etc then you should have turned on the news for the last year for literally 1 minute. Just 1 minute. She is a criminal, hell Donald probably is too but I'm going with the lesser of the two turds in that regard.
-How many candidates take days upon days off with less than 6 weeks before an election? Zero. How many faint from having to stand up outside in beautiful weather? How many get drugged up in order to not cough and try to look healthy for a short debate, but who have eyes that tell a completely different story of health? You are the type of person they knew they could fool. You see someone awake and not having a seizure and look no further.
-Maybe his tax return will lead to reform, but how is that his fault? Wouldn't that be something good that he highlighted?
The liberal media needs to stop being this biased!
Kramerica wrote:
The liberal media needs to stop being this biased!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/09/30/fox-news-poll-clinton-ahead-trump-after-debate-fear-motivating-both-sides.html
Nice link. Thanks.