Trump was impeached for a quid pro quo. Biden bragged about his quid pro quo and is yet to be impeached. Modern impeachments are purely theatrical wastes of time, as none will ever make it past the senate. There are more important things to concern oneself with. We need to stop with the endless prosecution of politics that both sides engage in.
Are you saying bragging about a quid pro quo is really the issue? It is not a US President extorting a US ally to investigate a US political challenger and his family?
Does saying it was a perfect phone call count as bragging?
Trump was right to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden as Biden bragged publicly that he used $1 billion in aid to Ukraine to fire the investigator that was looking into Burisma. The company where Hunter got paid huge $$ to sit in the Board
Didn't ask what the orangeman did. I didn't ask anything about the goal posts. I am asking what specific crime has brandon committed 🤔.
The evidence is overwhelming. Bank accounts, checks, transfers, shell company accounts, foreign inveigling, harbingers, trusts, and corporate accords that have inured to Biden's alleged benefactors. When will you stop denying everything set forth under law is true?
You know, I think you actually got him this time. Pretty sure that Biden really is guilty of bank accounts. Doesn't get any more specific than that.
Trump was impeached for a quid pro quo. Biden bragged about his quid pro quo and is yet to be impeached. Modern impeachments are purely theatrical wastes of time, as none will ever make it past the senate. There are more important things to concern oneself with. We need to stop with the endless prosecution of politics that both sides engage in.
Are you saying bragging about a quid pro quo is really the issue? It is not a US President extorting a US ally to investigate a US political challenger and his family?
Does saying it was a perfect phone call count as bragging?
And your argument is? I acknowledged Trump’s quid pro quo and the Democrat’s subsequent impeachment. I’ve also haven’t heard you deny Biden’s quid pro quo. If quid pro quo is a standard for impeachment set by the Democrats, then why do you question the reasoning behind Biden’s impeachment proceedings?
Any of the three would win in a landslide against Biden (particularly Haley, as she would pul a number of female votes away from the Democrats while retaining the base). Time will tell who the ultimate candidate is.
I disagree. Democrats weren't even ready to vote for a woman for President. Republicans aren't going to vote for a woman for President, especially not a Brown woman. "Well put" has it right. Your party is dominated by nutjob cultists.
You misunderstand the dynamic, then. Both parties have about 80-90% who will vote for the candidate regardless. Where Haley would gain traction is she would draw female voters away from the Democrats, who blindly vote for Democrats because of the abortion issue. Hillary wasn’t able to draw Republican female voters because they disagree with her ideologically. Hailey would draw Democrat female voters because they are drawn to the idea of a female in a position of power.
I disagree. Democrats weren't even ready to vote for a woman for President. Republicans aren't going to vote for a woman for President, especially not a Brown woman. "Well put" has it right. Your party is dominated by nutjob cultists.
You misunderstand the dynamic, then. Both parties have about 80-90% who will vote for the candidate regardless. Where Haley would gain traction is she would draw female voters away from the Democrats, who blindly vote for Democrats because of the abortion issue. Hillary wasn’t able to draw Republican female voters because they disagree with her ideologically. Hailey would draw Democrat female voters because they are drawn to the idea of a female in a position of power.
I would like to see two different candidates as well. But it is important to live in reality. Trump will be the nominee and it is political suicide to handicap yourself by throwing away the incumbent boost that most presidents enjoy getting elected a 2nd term. So it will be Biden.
I disagree. Democrats weren't even ready to vote for a woman for President. Republicans aren't going to vote for a woman for President, especially not a Brown woman. "Well put" has it right. Your party is dominated by nutjob cultists.
You misunderstand the dynamic, then. Both parties have about 80-90% who will vote for the candidate regardless. Where Haley would gain traction is she would draw female voters away from the Democrats, who blindly vote for Democrats because of the abortion issue. Hillary wasn’t able to draw Republican female voters because they disagree with her ideologically. Hailey would draw Democrat female voters because they are drawn to the idea of a female in a position of power.
LOLz you are dreaming if you think Ds will vote for trump-adoring Nikki. At worst they will stay home. There is no support for what you are contemplating. The ONLY reason her and meatball Ron are even registering in the polls is because some recognize the orange menace is damaged goods. Also, he hasn't shown up to debate or held as many rallies. It just shows how demented you are if you really think Nikki is a serious contender.
You misunderstand the dynamic, then. Both parties have about 80-90% who will vote for the candidate regardless. Where Haley would gain traction is she would draw female voters away from the Democrats, who blindly vote for Democrats because of the abortion issue. Hillary wasn’t able to draw Republican female voters because they disagree with her ideologically. Hailey would draw Democrat female voters because they are drawn to the idea of a female in a position of power.
Trump was right to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden as Biden bragged publicly that he used $1 billion in aid to Ukraine to fire the investigator that was looking into Burisma. The company where Hunter got paid huge $ to sit in the Board
Three questions:
If it was a legitimate governmental and national concern, Why was Rudy (freekin) Guiliani spearheading it? Trump even said, you need to call Rudy he will tell you wall you need to know. The US government is well equipped to investigate this stuff. Trump did not want that.
Why did Trump say to look into the 2016 election and prove that it was Ukraine interfering and not Russia?
Why did he want them to investigate the missing server of Hillary in Ukraine? LOL
Trump was doing what Trump does. He wanted BS to flood the airways to hurt Biden and help him. 100%.
And I'll add that to the large donors, this is a throw away election. They are using their money to signal to the GOP and voters that it's finally time to move on from trump. After his next colossal loss against Biden, the donors and GOP will be publicly shaming trump as a sore loser and that'll finish off his political ambitions.
I disagree. Democrats weren't even ready to vote for a woman for President. Republicans aren't going to vote for a woman for President, especially not a Brown woman. "Well put" has it right. Your party is dominated by nutjob cultists.
. Hillary wasn’t able to draw Republican female voters because they disagree with her ideologically. Hailey would draw Democrat female voters because they are drawn to the idea of a female in a position of power.
Didn't Haley just say she would sign a nationwide abortion ban at was it 6 weeks? Women are being radicalized by the GOP abortion stepford wives stuff. they aren't jumping aboard the Haley Train.
You misunderstand the dynamic, then. Both parties have about 80-90% who will vote for the candidate regardless. Where Haley would gain traction is she would draw female voters away from the Democrats, who blindly vote for Democrats because of the abortion issue. Hillary wasn’t able to draw Republican female voters because they disagree with her ideologically. Hailey would draw Democrat female voters because they are drawn to the idea of a female in a position of power.
I would like to see two different candidates as well. But it is important to live in reality. Trump will be the nominee and it is political suicide to handicap yourself by throwing away the incumbent boost that most presidents enjoy getting elected a 2nd term. So it will be Biden.
Your Haley wish is fantasy. It won't happen.
Correct, pure fantasy. This is going to be a colossal let down for Rs who think Biden is somehow finished. He's old and slower, but the Ds are fully behind him and it's one fk up after the other in the GQP - not to mention to their cemented leader is deep in an avalanche of legal issues.
The evidence is overwhelming. Bank accounts, checks, transfers, shell company accounts, foreign inveigling, harbingers, trusts, and corporate accords that have inured to Biden's alleged benefactors. When will you stop denying everything set forth under law is true?
You know, I think you actually got him this time. Pretty sure that Biden really is guilty of bank accounts. Doesn't get any more specific than that.
Trump knows his marks well. They spew things out that they were told like bank accounts, checks transfers,trusts, and other generalities, blah blah blah, with the pretense that this all proves a crime??
Well these are the same marks that also thought there was so much evidence of a stolen election.
I would like to see two different candidates as well. But it is important to live in reality. Trump will be the nominee and it is political suicide to handicap yourself by throwing away the incumbent boost that most presidents enjoy getting elected a 2nd term. So it will be Biden.
Your Haley wish is fantasy. It won't happen.
Correct, pure fantasy. This is going to be a colossal let down for Rs who think Biden is somehow finished. He's old and slower, but the Ds are fully behind him and it's one fk up after the other in the GQP - not to mention to their cemented leader is deep in an avalanche of legal issues.
It's classic approach avoidance conflict. The closer they come to election time and thinking Trump could actually be president again, even those lukewarm Biden, will be driven to vote out of Trump disgust.
Trump was right to ask Ukraine to investigate Biden as Biden bragged publicly that he used $1 billion in aid to Ukraine to fire the investigator that was looking into Burisma. The company where Hunter got paid huge $ to sit in the Board
Three questions:
If it was a legitimate governmental and national concern, Why was Rudy (freekin) Guiliani spearheading it? Trump even said, you need to call Rudy he will tell you wall you need to know. The US government is well equipped to investigate this stuff. Trump did not want that.
Why did Trump say to look into the 2016 election and prove that it was Ukraine interfering and not Russia?
Why did he want them to investigate the missing server of Hillary in Ukraine? LOL
Trump was doing what Trump does. He wanted BS to flood the airways to hurt Biden and help him. 100%.
So why was Hunter being paid big $$ to sit on the board of an energy company in Ukraine when he had no expertise and a drug addiction?
And why did VP Joe Biden threaten to withhold $1 billion in aid from Ukraine if they did not fire the guy investigating corruption of that very company?
So why was Hunter being paid big $ to sit on the board of an energy company in Ukraine when he had no expertise and a drug addiction?
And why did VP Joe Biden threaten to withhold $1 billion in aid from Ukraine if they did not fire the guy investigating corruption of that very company?
Nope. Not playing your distraction game. Posters have explained this to you many times
So why was Hunter being paid big $ to sit on the board of an energy company in Ukraine when he had no expertise and a drug addiction?
And why did VP Joe Biden threaten to withhold $1 billion in aid from Ukraine if they did not fire the guy investigating corruption of that very company?
Nope. Not playing your distraction game. Posters have explained this to you many times
Really?
How about one last time and I will never ask again.
Hell. Don't even bother. Just point me to one of these many times this has been explained to me.
Because it sure looks like blatant corruption to me
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
You know, I think you actually got him this time. Pretty sure that Biden really is guilty of bank accounts. Doesn't get any more specific than that.
Trump knows his marks well. They spew things out that they were told like bank accounts, checks transfers,trusts, and other generalities, blah blah blah, with the pretense that this all proves a crime??
You are being vituperous. All of those RICO predicates have been proven to exist in substantial form. The writing is schmeared on the wall. And yet you still deny the obvious and established facts, even after I rubbed your proverbial snout in them. I'm rarely called to do that. I rarely do that even to secular, liberalists who have stomp walled our Judeo-Christian culture and values to freedom.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.