Hold on, Burgernuts. You're putting a lot of words in my mouth and also exaggerating things and making everything a binary. I didn't really comment on any of this other than to wonder what the rather confusing reference to Cannon's husband, mob bosses and "LinkedIn wipe of the Mar-a-Lago documents scandal" meant. And now you're lumping me in with the Village Idiot and saying I want things ignored? Biff.
Anyway, first of all, I don't think you can question a judge's integrity based on what their spouses say or do. Tenuous and you could probably apply such a tactic against every judge in the country. And I certainly don't think you can question a judge's integrity based on the loose connections above. You could disqualify everyone playing 7 degrees of separation like you are doing.
Second, there seems to be a big difference between Ginni Thomas's behavior (who I never mentioned or commented about) and Cannon's husband's behavior. Right? If what you say is true about Ginni Thomas, she's affirmatively engaging in support of riotous behavior (kind of like VP Harris bailing out BLM looters from jail so they can go steal more sh!t and burn more buildings). Cannon's husband is just posting his opinions (whatever they were) on LinkedIn.
Third, I assume Cannon's husband deleted (wiped) his LinkedIn references to Mar-Lag precisely because his wife got assigned the Mar-Lag search warrant case. That would be the prudent thing to do. Appearance of impropriety and all. The chances of a judge being disqualified because of a spouse's opinion on social media are pretty much zero, so he wasn't deleting them out of that fear.
Fourth, how do we know Cannon's husband even did this? I couldn't find any mention of it in that article that was posted.