The most recent election was 2018.
That you gives a better idea of where Americans stand right now.
The most recent election was 2018.
That you gives a better idea of where Americans stand right now.
agip's agenda
And agip partakes in Democratic numbers that make him feel better (see the Election in 2016---oh wait, they were wrong!)
What is with you Trumpers and the 2016 election? Old news, brother. What a weird argument...can't criticize the President because he won an election 3 calendar years ago. You are living in the past. Join the present where we know The Orange One is a serial liar and a criminal. The curtain has been pulled back, and only the stupid and racist continue to support him. Unfortunately, that is still a lot of people.
Get yourself to the point that you can honestly say, "I WAS stupid. I WAS racist." I all for redemption.
P wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole and others ...
Trump is buffoon but he is a moderate. His policies are ones that every American should support. Secure borders, immigration via orderly and procedural means, equal standards in college admissions and elsewhere, Supreme Court justices who rely on precedent and the Constitution, etc., etc. Again, he is a moderate. The radicals are AOC, Kamala Harris, Corey Booker, Bernie Sanders, Eliz. Warren, and others. They want to throw away the Constitution and make America a socialist state. AOC advocates paying people who refuse to work. You can't have a system where people who refuse to work are paid the same as the hardworking ones. That is why socialism and communism failed. When one worker sees that another worker working his or her asss off gets not a dime more than he or she who refuses to work, then he or she will have no motivation to "get in the system" and work his or tail off when at the end of the day he or she will make the same as Joe and Josephina Blow do who busted their assses all year long.
I note that this notion of paying people who choose not to work lies at the center of your concerns regarding AOC's Green New Deal. Below I have pasted the resolutions contained in the Green New Deal. Among those resolutions I do not find any that mandate or recommend paying people who choose not to work. Admittedly much of the Green New Deal is rather vaguely defined.
" Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—
(1) it is the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal—
(A) to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions through a fair and just transition for all communities and workers;
(B) to create millions of good, high-wage jobs and ensure prosperity and economic security for all people of the United States;
(C) to invest in the infrastructure and industry of the United States to sustainably meet the challenges of the 21st century;
(D) to secure for all people of the United States for generations to come—
(i) clean air and water;
(ii) climate and community resiliency;
(iii) healthy food;
(iv) access to nature; and
(v) a sustainable environment; and
(E) to promote justice and equity by stopping current, preventing future, and repairing historic oppression of indigenous peoples, communities of color, migrant communities, deindustrialized communities, depopulated rural communities, the poor, low-income workers, women, the elderly, the unhoused, people with disabilities, and youth (referred to in this resolution as “frontline and vulnerable communities”);
(2) the goals described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1) (referred to in this resolution as the “Green New Deal goals”) should be accomplished through a 10-year national mobilization (referred to in this resolution as the “Green New Deal mobilization”) that will require the following goals and projects—
(A) building resiliency against climate change-related disasters, such as extreme weather, including by leveraging funding and providing investments for community-defined projects and strategies;
(B) repairing and upgrading the infrastructure in the United States, including—
(i) by eliminating pollution and greenhouse gas emissions as much as technologically feasible;
(ii) by guaranteeing universal access to clean water;
(iii) by reducing the risks posed by climate impacts; and
(iv) by ensuring that any infrastructure bill considered by Congress addresses climate change;
(C) meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources, including—
(i) by dramatically expanding and upgrading renewable power sources; and
(ii) by deploying new capacity;
(D) building or upgrading to energy-efficient, distributed, and “smart” power grids, and ensuring affordable access to electricity;
(E) upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximum energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability, including through electrification;
(F) spurring massive growth in clean manufacturing in the United States and removing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing and industry as much as is technologically feasible, including by expanding renewable energy manufacturing and investing in existing manufacturing and industry;
(G) working collaboratively with farmers and ranchers in the United States to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector as much as is technologically feasible, including—
(i) by supporting family farming;
(ii) by investing in sustainable farming and land use practices that increase soil health; and
(iii) by building a more sustainable food system that ensures universal access to healthy food;
(H) overhauling transportation systems in the United States to remove pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector as much as is technologically feasible, including through investment in—
(i) zero-emission vehicle infrastructure and manufacturing;
(ii) clean, affordable, and accessible public transit; and
(iii) high-speed rail;
(I) mitigating and managing the long-term adverse health, economic, and other effects of pollution and climate change, including by providing funding for community-defined projects and strategies;
(J) removing greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and reducing pollution by restoring natural ecosystems through proven low-tech solutions that increase soil carbon storage, such as land preservation and afforestation;
(K) restoring and protecting threatened, endangered, and fragile ecosystems through locally appropriate and science-based projects that enhance biodiversity and support climate resiliency;
(L) cleaning up existing hazardous waste and abandoned sites, ensuring economic development and sustainability on those sites;
(M) identifying other emission and pollution sources and creating solutions to remove them; and
(N) promoting the international exchange of technology, expertise, products, funding, and services, with the aim of making the United States the international leader on climate action, and to help other countries achieve a Green New Deal;
(3) a Green New Deal must be developed through transparent and inclusive consultation, collaboration, and partnership with frontline and vulnerable communities, labor unions, worker cooperatives, civil society groups, academia, and businesses; and
(4) to achieve the Green New Deal goals and mobilization, a Green New Deal will require the following goals and projects—
(A) providing and leveraging, in a way that ensures that the public receives appropriate ownership stakes and returns on investment, adequate capital (including through community grants, public banks, and other public financing), technical expertise, supporting policies, and other forms of assistance to communities, organizations, Federal, State, and local government agencies, and businesses working on the Green New Deal mobilization;
(B) ensuring that the Federal Government takes into account the complete environmental and social costs and impacts of emissions through—
(i) existing laws;
(ii) new policies and programs; and
(iii) ensuring that frontline and vulnerable communities shall not be adversely affected;
(C) providing resources, training, and high-quality education, including higher education, to all people of the United States, with a focus on frontline and vulnerable communities, so that all people of the United States may be full and equal participants in the Green New Deal mobilization;
(D) making public investments in the research and development of new clean and renewable energy technologies and industries;
(E) directing investments to spur economic development, deepen and diversify industry and business in local and regional economies, and build wealth and community ownership, while prioritizing high-quality job creation and economic, social, and environmental benefits in frontline and vulnerable communities, and deindustrialized communities, that may otherwise struggle with the transition away from greenhouse gas intensive industries;
(F) ensuring the use of democratic and participatory processes that are inclusive of and led by frontline and vulnerable communities and workers to plan, implement, and administer the Green New Deal mobilization at the local level;
(G) ensuring that the Green New Deal mobilization creates high-quality union jobs that pay prevailing wages, hires local workers, offers training and advancement opportunities, and guarantees wage and benefit parity for workers affected by the transition;
(H) guaranteeing a job with a family-sustaining wage, adequate family and medical leave, paid vacations, and retirement security to all people of the United States;
(I) strengthening and protecting the right of all workers to organize, unionize, and collectively bargain free of coercion, intimidation, and harassment;
(J) strengthening and enforcing labor, workplace health and safety, antidiscrimination, and wage and hour standards across all employers, industries, and sectors;
(K) enacting and enforcing trade rules, procurement standards, and border adjustments with strong labor and environmental protections—
(i) to stop the transfer of jobs and pollution overseas; and
(ii) to grow domestic manufacturing in the United States;
(L) ensuring that public lands, waters, and oceans are protected and that eminent domain is not abused;
(M) obtaining the free, prior, and informed consent of indigenous peoples for all decisions that affect indigenous peoples and their traditional territories, honoring all treaties and agreements with indigenous peoples, and protecting and enforcing the sovereignty and land rights of indigenous peoples;
(N) ensuring a commercial environment where every businessperson is free from unfair competition and domination by domestic or international monopolies; and
(O) providing all people of the United States with—
(i) high-quality health care;
(ii) affordable, safe, and adequate housing;
(iii) economic security; and
(iv) clean water, clean air, healthy and affordable food, and access to nature."
It omitted bringing peace to the Middle East.
L L wrote:
The most recent election was 2018.
That you gives a better idea of where Americans stand right now.
Exactly.
The 2018 election was the most accurate poll possible. And I seem to remember that, beforehand, Trump proclaimed (in typical humble Trump fashion) that the midterm elections were going to be all about him, even though he wasn't running. Well, he got his answer about how the voters feel about him.
He'll be running as the incumbent in 2020, which is a big advantage. If the economy is still good, he'll have that advantage as well. But he is about as unpopular as you can get, like Jimmy Carter level unpopularity (although for much different reasons). And we haven't even seen the Mueller report yet, I expect that even if it doesn't lead to indictment/impeachment, that report will be a gold mine for the Democrats running in 2020.
The Democrats have a big opportunity but, as others have said, they have to nominate the right person (unlike last time).
johnny99 wrote:
He'll be running as the incumbent in 2020,
I hope not
If something major happens to Trump's ability to run in 2020 or his numbers fall below 30%, how quickly can Republicans assemble and run primaries for 2020?
SDSU Aztec wrote:
P wrote:
I note that this notion of paying people who choose not to work lies at the center of your concerns regarding AOC's Green New Deal. Below I have pasted the resolutions contained in the Green New Deal. Among those resolutions I do not find any that mandate or recommend paying people who choose not to work. Admittedly much of the Green New Deal is rather vaguely defined.
" Text of New Green Deal"
It omitted bringing peace to the Middle East.
Hey, I'm not saying that it is realistic. Just saying I don't think it says what he thinks it says.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wujVMIYzYXgL L wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
He'll be running as the incumbent in 2020,
I hope not
If something major happens to Trump's ability to run in 2020 or his numbers fall below 30%, how quickly can Republicans assemble and run primaries for 2020?
remember, everything trump touches dies, so expect the same of the Republican Party. I'd expect them to be pretty much spent as a national force after 2020. Trump will run, he will lose, the senate will probably switch, and the GOP will be back to obstructionism. Which they love to do...more than governing actually.
Although of course right wing-ism won't go away. This is a center-right country. And after Bush2's leading us from peace and prosperity to war and economic collapse, everyone though the GOP was gone for while. And lo...it came back.
L L wrote:
The most recent election was 2018.
That you gives a better idea of where Americans stand right now.
Is that what CNN told you to make you feel better?
L L wrote:
johnny99 wrote:
He'll be running as the incumbent in 2020,
I hope not
If something major happens to Trump's ability to run in 2020 or his numbers fall below 30%, how quickly can Republicans assemble and run primaries for 2020?
lol what world are you living in? Trump's approval is at 50% you idiot. I can't wait to come back here in 2020 and see all the tears. it's gornna be great.
2020 tears coming your way wrote:
L L wrote:
I hope not
If something major happens to Trump's ability to run in 2020 or his numbers fall below 30%, how quickly can Republicans assemble and run primaries for 2020?
lol what world are you living in? Trump's approval is at 50% you idiot. I can't wait to come back here in 2020 and see all the tears. it's gornna be great.
It may be 50% in your household, but the midterm results speak for themselves. Trump couldn't even get 50% of the vote against Hillary, and that was probably the best day he'll ever have in electoral politics.
your a lost little boy wrote:
L L wrote:
The most recent election was 2018.
That you gives a better idea of where Americans stand right now.
Is that what CNN told you to make you feel better?
Did someone tell you that 2016 is more recent than 2018?
I had been thinking Trump would eventually get his way with this emergency declaration, but apparently he probably will not: The Emergency Declaration law specifically says that the money requisitioned by the executive branch during an emergency...must be used on a military installation. You can't go out into the desert and build a wall with it. Which kills off the entire premise of this attempt.
I"m sure Trump will try to declare the entire border a military zone or something like that, but I have to think SCOTUS will say no to that - it doesn't pass the giggle test.
So this is heartening for democracy.
Most likely events:
1) House and Senate pass bill ordering end to emergency declaration
2) Spanks vetoes it
3) House and Senate can't override veto
4) Court cases fire up and SCOTUS eventually tells the WH to stuff it. Emergency spending has to be on military bases, not on land eminently domained away from citizens.
That said, Spanks doesnt' want the wall, not really. He wants the fight. So one more example of busting norms is a win in his book.
Banana Bread. wrote:
Alan Hale wrote:
Yep, now you bring up Ann because she fits your agenda. But when she supports something else Trump does, she's a nut job. That's the NUMBER 1 reason this thread has gone the way it has...with Flagpole the leader you all bow to as the main mentally unstable liberal...pissed because Hillary the Crook lost.
I agree, this sums up 90% of this entire thread.
Cherry picking to find anything that can be construed as fault, but then ignore anything positive.
B!tch, B!tch, B!tch, so this thread has gone and will continue to with extreme left wing whiners like Flagpole and others.
No you still don’t get it. Ann Coulter is a wacko. Nuts. Crazy. But she is a strong voice in the far right crazy section of the GOP....like Rush and Hannity. Even crazy people can have good lucid thoughts.
Alan
Keep America Great_ 2020 wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
This is what you people continue to fail to understand.....a past president’s unconstitutional power grab does not make the current president’s unconstitutional power grab any more right.
You’re painting in black and white.
Alan
Protecting the country's border is not a "power grab". Hundreds of thousands of illegals coming in the country is not any sort of "political stunt." These are real people and real lives being affected.
That. Doesn’t. Matter. He’s. Bypassing. Congress. Please. Read. Constitution.
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
Banana Bread. wrote:
I agree, this sums up 90% of this entire thread.
Cherry picking to find anything that can be construed as fault, but then ignore anything positive.
B!tch, B!tch, B!tch, so this thread has gone and will continue to with extreme left wing whiners like Flagpole and others.
No you still don’t get it. Ann Coulter is a wacko. Nuts. Crazy. But she is a strong voice in the far right crazy section of the GOP....like Rush and Hannity. Even crazy people can have good lucid thoughts.
Alan
Coulter isn't crazy - she's just selling books. No one sells any political books by being reasonable. Coulter knows that a woman who looks like her and says outrageous things will get a lot of press and therefore sell a lot of books and speeches.
She's just making coin by being loud and opinionated. Not crazy. Unamerican, sure.
we will never be a socialist country wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:3. Is the Green New Deal considered Socialism?
I cannot fathom how any sane-minded person would consider it anything other than socialism at the highest level.
Missing the point.
Would a Oil and Coal New Deal be equally as Socialist?
What makes it Socialist? Is the government forcing you to work those jobs for the good of the country? Paying you? Is the government then controlling who gets the energy?
It’s just a “mission statement” so it doesn’t really matter. By the time a Congress gets done with it, even a 100% Democrat Congress, it’s going to look wildly different than the bare bones no details Green New Deal.
AOC simply used it as tool to get noticed. No one would even know WTF she is without it.
Alan
Flagpole wrote:
Get yourself to the point that you can honestly say, "I WAS stupid. I WAS racist." I all for redemption.
Good god you are such a flailing idiot!
Runningart2004 wrote:
Keep America Great_ 2020 wrote:
Protecting the country's border is not a "power grab". Hundreds of thousands of illegals coming in the country is not any sort of "political stunt." These are real people and real lives being affected.
That. Doesn’t. Matter. He’s. Bypassing. Congress. Please. Read. Constitution.
Alan
You're only using the "oh but the constitution!" excuse because it 'conveniently' fits your narrative.
Congress has abdicated some of it's highest responsibilities TO the constitution, protecting the border, allowing foreign agents to operate within our government, allowing unfounded war, and more. "Congress" doesn't give a rat's ass about the constitution.
agip wrote:
I had been thinking Trump would eventually get his way with this emergency declaration, but apparently he probably will not: The Emergency Declaration law specifically says that the money requisitioned by the executive branch during an emergency...must be used on a military installation. You can't go out into the desert and build a wall with it. Which kills off the entire premise of this attempt.
I"m sure Trump will try to declare the entire border a military zone or something like that, but I have to think SCOTUS will say no to that - it doesn't pass the giggle test.
So this is heartening for democracy.
Most likely events:
1) House and Senate pass bill ordering end to emergency declaration
2) Spanks vetoes it
3) House and Senate can't override veto
4) Court cases fire up and SCOTUS eventually tells the WH to stuff it. Emergency spending has to be on military bases, not on land eminently domained away from citizens.
That said, Spanks doesnt' want the wall, not really. He wants the fight. So one more example of busting norms is a win in his book.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/stephen-millers-own-words-show-the-weakness-of-the-trump-legal-argument-on-the-wall/
Right now eight GOP senators have said they are opposed to the emergency declaration. Only 8 are willing to stand up against McConnell giving away the Senate to the WH. That's enough to pass a bill but not override a veto. Shame, shame, eternal shame on the GOP.
Twelve others have expressed concern.
But....Interestingly, add 'em all up, you get 8+12 = 20 Rs. Add those 20 to the Dem's 47 senators and you get an override. In the senate anyway.
"By FiveThirtyEight’s count, at least eight GOP senators — Tennessee’s Lamar Alexander, Maine’s Susan Collins, Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski, Kentucky’s Rand Paul, Florida’s Marco Rubio, Nebraska’s Ben Sasse, North Carolina’s Thom Tillis and Pennsylvania’s Pat Toomey "
Sally has a 45IQ wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Please take the time to explain why he is not a moderate. Thanks in advance!
Since you are demanding explaining, you must FIRST offer your own. So ...
Please take the time to explain why Trump is not a criminal . Thanks in advance!
I am sure you are not a legal scholar but have you ever heard of the "presumption of innocence?" Until Trump is indicted and hauled before a court and convicted of a crime, he is presumed innocent. Got it?