remember, trumpers tell you that biden ruined the US oil industry.
Meanwhile, the US is the world's largest oil producer, and its advantage has only grown since trump left office.
-
46
-
agip wrote:
Academic Discussion wrote:
Great point because politicians can participate in any crimes they want when they're between terms in office. That's why Democrats don't care about what private citizen Donald Trump does.
the better point is that loaning family members money and then getting paid back is not a crime in any way and especially not an impeachable offense.
This is all documented on the other side. Joe loaned money out to family members...it came back later, interest free apparently.
There is zero evidence of a crime. Zero.
Wrong. Money laundering is indeed a crime.
63 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
BibleThumpedHatred wrote:
I provided links with real numbers. You countered with made up values and vague conspiracy theories once again. Historical percentages of D vs. R did not change, yet trumpers claim widespread fraud for which they cannot provide any actual evidence. Investigations have proven Biden won and they were funded and run by.... Republicans!
Oh I see what's happening here. You're just really stupid.
How do you prove that a mail in ballot was or wasn't fraudulent when there's no requirement for signature matching?
15 year olds don't fraudulent send in a mail in ballot. If it did happen it would be very very rare. Most mail in ballots come in from overseas and from our military that cannot make it home to vote. Do you want to keep the US military members from voting 🗳 A fascist like you probably would.
42 -
P IGA wrote:
agip wrote:
the better point is that loaning family members money and then getting paid back is not a crime in any way and especially not an impeachable offense.
This is all documented on the other side. Joe loaned money out to family members...it came back later, interest free apparently.
There is zero evidence of a crime. Zero.
Wrong. Money laundering is indeed a crime.
yes, but paying back a loan is not money laundering, so all good.
you idiots.
34 -
Trumpanzees are stinking up the Message Board... wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Oh I see what's happening here. You're just really stupid.
How do you prove that a mail in ballot was or wasn't fraudulent when there's no requirement for signature matching?
15 year olds don't fraudulent send in a mail in ballot. If it did happen it would be very very rare. Most mail in ballots come in from overseas and from our military that cannot make it home to vote. Do you want to keep the US military members from voting 🗳 A fascist like you probably would.
Mail in voting is not a new thing. In fact, The GOP had dominated mail in voting for 15 years! That is how people voted in florida and how the GOP cleaned up.
It was only when Dems starting pushing for mail in voting that it became some type of sinister fraud ridden practice. Of course the reason is that Trump said this. And if Trump says this our resident Trumpers regurgitate and think this bunk works on us too.
53 -
agip wrote:
P IGA wrote:
Wrong. Money laundering is indeed a crime.
yes, but paying back a loan is not money laundering, so all good.
you idiots.
Wrong again. This is classic money laundering by disguising funds to be used for loans. Especially from the same account that was as used to receive illicit funds from China. Stop being a dope.
32 -
Both sentences seem overly lenient. But the two crimes are very different.
Biggs conspired with others for months in prep for Jan 6.
"employed his military experience to direct and control large groups of
men under his command" to lead a "revolt against the government"....
In court, a tearful Biggs apologised for his actions and said he had been "seduced" by the crowd on the day of the riot....
"I know that I have to be punished, and I understand," Biggs said."Wendy's arsonists. For completeness, the Wendy's arsonists got $500, 150 hours of community service and 5 years probation. Still too lenient.
43 -
Unvaccinated straight white maIe wrote:
You think that the particular bank account of Hunter's that was used to send money to Joe Biden is somehow relevant?
My DOG! You people are stup!d !
14 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
The evidence continues to mount.
Impeach Sleepy Joe.
And another one who has absolutely no idea how any of this works. It's incredible how dumb you people are.
Oh wait, that's GDG. You've long since established your very low two digit IQ.
22 -
Academic Discussion wrote:
Ivyguy wrote:
Okay--and? The article (even assuming the reporting is accurate--unfortunately, not a given with ZeroHedge), says that this happened while JRB was a private citizen.
Great point because politicians can participate in any crimes they want when they're between terms in office. That's why Democrats don't care about what private citizen Donald Trump does.
I think you missed the real point here that there is zero evidence that Joe Biden committed any crimes.
Oh wait, Hunter Biden used the VERY SAME bank account to receive money from China that he used to pay back a loan to Joe Biden. That must be VERY meaningful!
#moron
14 -
P IGA wrote:
agip wrote:
yes, but paying back a loan is not money laundering, so all good.
you idiots.
Wrong again. This is classic money laundering by disguising funds to be used for loans. Especially from the same account that was as used to receive illicit funds from China. Stop being a dope.
Exactly! FROM THE VERY SAME ACCOUNT!!!
That is very meaningful!!!!!
How can these "Democrats" not get it?!?
14 -
Trumpanzees are stinking up the Message Board... wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Oh I see what's happening here. You're just really stupid.
How do you prove that a mail in ballot was or wasn't fraudulent when there's no requirement for signature matching?
15 year olds don't fraudulent send in a mail in ballot. If it did happen it would be very very rare. Most mail in ballots come in from overseas and from our military that cannot make it home to vote. Do you want to keep the US military members from voting 🗳 A fascist like you probably would.
You're a f*cking idiot.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.
44 -
CriticalThinkingSkills wrote:
Both sentences seem overly lenient. But the two crimes are very different.
Biggs conspired with others for months in prep for Jan 6.
"employed his military experience to direct and control large groups of
men under his command" to lead a "revolt against the government"....
In court, a tearful Biggs apologised for his actions and said he had been "seduced" by the crowd on the day of the riot....
"I know that I have to be punished, and I understand," Biggs said."Wendy's arsonists. For completeness, the Wendy's arsonists got $500, 150 hours of community service and 5 years probation. Still too lenient.
Anyone who calls the mob on January 6th a "revolt against the government" is a a G*ddamn moron.
25 -
Sally Vix wrote:
El Runkin wrote:
I read the GOP Crime blotter whenever it comes out. Monday edition is best.
The Monday edition of the GOP crime blotter is routinely the best because Agip has spent the entire weekend scouring the headlines for misdeeds committed by Republicans. The other days of the week he has not had enough time scouring the headlines.
Yes, we all know he could use editorial assistance later in the week. But we're just knitpocking now. We allow a degree of freedom in this country. That's what the Founding Fathers killed for. If we're going to retroactive the whole thing, we lose the hindsight. So we would appreciate it if you didn't go all goddam half-cocked every time the goddam blotter comes out. I mean Jesus Christ, what's your issue? The infamy?
00 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
The evidence continues to mount.
Impeach Sleepy Joe.
Wow! $1,380 a month? That’s some big time crime right there.
14 -
Don’t conflate because if with in spite of. Oil production increased primarily on non-federal lands in states that did not enact anti-fracking legislation. Don’t thank Biden. Thank Texas.
42 -
CriticalThinkingSkills wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Oh I see what's happening here. You're just really stupid.
How do you prove that a mail in ballot was or wasn't fraudulent when there's no requirement for signature matching?
Do you realize that in many states an ID is not required to vote in person? Since most Trump voters voted in person, any Trump voter that did not show ID must be fraudulent. No proof needed! See how weak that is? Yet, this is your argument.
10 -
.
And how much does the US spend compared to other countries? In particular, when there's a school district with 40% of high schools not having 1 single student proficient in math - and that one spends the 4th most in the nation - you can't seriously believe spending more will fix the issues
32 -
We can't allow Biden to have a second term.
13 -
Real Obvi wrote:
P IGA wrote:
Wrong again. This is classic money laundering by disguising funds to be used for loans. Especially from the same account that was as used to receive illicit funds from China. Stop being a dope.
Exactly! FROM THE VERY SAME ACCOUNT!!!
That is very meaningful!!!!!
How can these "Democrats" not get it?!?
Hi Hooma/Real Obvi/GEICO!
11
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.