Fat fvck donald loses again, getting killed by Pelosi ? ? ? ? ????
Fat fvck donald loses again, getting killed by Pelosi ? ? ? ? ????
Disco Cary wrote:
TTH wrote:
McConnell stands up to Trump once again.
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/430070-mcconnell-trump-to-sign-border-deal-declare-national-emergencyThat's right! Just like I told you Demonrats all along. We ARE holding Trump accountable. Something that nobody ever did with Obummer!
M. A. G. A.
neener, neener, neener
I'm hearing a lot of R senators saying the emergency is a very bad idea. I'm not completely sure trump will get away with this.
But remember he doesn't really want the wall - he wants the fight. He would be fine with being slapped down by rubio, sasse, toomey, etc. Trump would use that as gunpowder, cocaine.
this is very bad for democracy tho - we needed mcconnell to stand up to trump, not bend over. he's the worse major politician of the era. utter cynicism and lack of democratic instincts.
jesseriley wrote:
The emergency is that Obama was and still is a traitor, and everyone knows all about it.
True to that brother!
Flagpole wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/government-shutdown-vote-border-bill-trump-n971576So according to McConnell, Trump will declare a state of emergency. So this probably goes to the courts and eventually ends up at SCOTUS.
Let’s just say Trump succeeds and gets “The Wall” built through the state of emergency.
Does that mean future presidents can use the state of emergency when they don’t get their way? Green New Deal? Medicare For All?
Alan
This is a bad precedent, and I wouldn't want a Democrat President to do this for a policy issue either. What if a Democrat runs on "serious gun reform/restrictions" and gets elected? As powerful as the NRA is, most of the voting public would like to see more gun control. Can he/she then point to all the gun deaths including accidental shootings and declare that an Emergency? I would actually NOT be for that. Democrats get gun control. Republicans get new abortion laws...and on and on.
We have a non-perfect yet pretty good way to get policy made in this country, and it doesn't involve declaring emergencies or even Executive Orders. I didn't like it when Obama signed Executive Orders either. Anyone with integrity would NOT like that, even IF they like the very specific thing being done. It's the process and creation of precedent that really matters.
Of COURSE it would be this idiot President who would challenge this norm among others. It's not good, and it WILL come back to bite Republicans one day if he gets funding for that stupid wall in this manner.
Trump has already "demanded" that CA give him back $3.5B of rail transit money. Of course, Trump is too stupid to understand that Congress controls how money is spent. But, Trump will likely scream that CA is for open "boarders" [sic per Trump] for refusing to given him $3.5B. His mouth-breather Trumper fanboys will droll all over Trump "owing" CA.
Flagpole wrote:
I see Rigged has laid low all day after being proven wrong yesterday about Trump's knowledge of Flynn's foreign contacts before he hired him and was called out by me to admit he was wrong.
Not surprised. Disappointed but not surprised.
Mueller is coming (and this includes any office to which he pawned off work...something I have mentioned before, but doing so again because people have shown they don't remember too well).
The clown is done.
Sally has taken over for she/him.
Fiagpole wrote:
jesseriley wrote:
The emergency is that Obama was and still is a traitor, and everyone knows all about it.
True to that brother!
“This comeback was approved by toddler tiny”
money backed wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
This is a bad precedent, and I wouldn't want a Democrat President to do this for a policy issue either. What if a Democrat runs on "serious gun reform/restrictions" and gets elected? As powerful as the NRA is, most of the voting public would like to see more gun control. Can he/she then point to all the gun deaths including accidental shootings and declare that an Emergency? I would actually NOT be for that. Democrats get gun control. Republicans get new abortion laws...and on and on.
We have a non-perfect yet pretty good way to get policy made in this country, and it doesn't involve declaring emergencies or even Executive Orders. I didn't like it when Obama signed Executive Orders either. Anyone with integrity would NOT like that, even IF they like the very specific thing being done. It's the process and creation of precedent that really matters.
Of COURSE it would be this idiot President who would challenge this norm among others. It's not good, and it WILL come back to bite Republicans one day if he gets funding for that stupid wall in this manner.
Trump has already "demanded" that CA give him back $3.5B of rail transit money. Of course, Trump is too stupid to understand that Congress controls how money is spent. But, Trump will likely scream that CA is for open "boarders" [sic per Trump] for refusing to given him $3.5B. His mouth-breather Trumper fanboys will droll all over Trump "owing" CA.
2020 will be a true test for America. After all we have seen from tiny hands and brain, anyone who votes for him can be permanently written off as fvcking stupid.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CRyatVVsCJYDumbMFers wrote:
money backed wrote:
Trump has already "demanded" that CA give him back $3.5B of rail transit money. Of course, Trump is too stupid to understand that Congress controls how money is spent. But, Trump will likely scream that CA is for open "boarders" [sic per Trump] for refusing to given him $3.5B. His mouth-breather Trumper fanboys will droll all over Trump "owing" CA.
2020 will be a true test for America. After all we have seen from tiny hands and brain, anyone who votes for him can be permanently written off as fvcking stupid.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CRyatVVsCJY
35-40% of the population will support him regardless just because he’s an R.
If 100% of them vote then it’s likely he’s re-elected. It’s always about turnout when barely 60% of those eligible even vote.
That’s why H lost. It wasn’t really about Russia. It was being an unelectable shrew.
Alan
this piece says that the vote in the senate against the emergency declaration would likely peel off a few Rs and pass.
so the bill would go to trump, he'd veto it.
And then trump would get his authoritarian way anyway.
gawd we suck right now.
Runningart2004 wrote:
DumbMFers wrote:
2020 will be a true test for America. After all we have seen from tiny hands and brain, anyone who votes for him can be permanently written off as fvcking stupid.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CRyatVVsCJY35-40% of the population will support him regardless just because he’s an R.
If 100% of them vote then it’s likely he’s re-elected. It’s always about turnout when barely 60% of those eligible even vote.
That’s why H lost. It wasn’t really about Russia. It was being an unelectable shrew.
Alan
please list the number of presidents since Roosevelt elected to keep the WH in the hands of the same party for a third consecutive term. I'll give you one: Bush1.
You give me the rest.
Runningart2004 wrote:
DumbMFers wrote:
2020 will be a true test for America. After all we have seen from tiny hands and brain, anyone who votes for him can be permanently written off as fvcking stupid.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CRyatVVsCJY35-40% of the population will support him regardless just because he’s an R.
If 100% of them vote then it’s likely he’s re-elected. It’s always about turnout when barely 60% of those eligible even vote.
That’s why H lost. It wasn’t really about Russia. It was being an unelectable shrew.
Alan
Like I said, write them off as fvcking stupid
So many good things are happening. The Mueller probe is proving to be a sham. The economy is roaring along! Black and Hispanic unemployment are at historic lows. North Korea hasn't launched a missile in more than 6 months. NASDAQ has gone up 20% in just two months. The Wall IS going to be built and the crisis at the border is about to get resolved. So many great things for the country.
Sally Vix [Rigged by Hillary] wrote:
So many good things are happening. The Mueller probe is proving to be a sham. The economy is roaring along! Black and Hispanic unemployment are at historic lows. North Korea hasn't launched a missile in more than 6 months. NASDAQ has gone up 20% in just two months. The Wall IS going to be built and the crisis at the border is about to get resolved. So many great things for the country.
A perfect parody of Rigged, Sally boy.
DumbMFers wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
35-40% of the population will support him regardless just because he’s an R.
If 100% of them vote then it’s likely he’s re-elected. It’s always about turnout when barely 60% of those eligible even vote.
That’s why H lost. It wasn’t really about Russia. It was being an unelectable shrew.
Alan
Like I said, write them off as fvcking stupid
No more stupid than the 35-40% who would vote for a D just because they are a D.
As far as the statistics go.....yes it’s not at all likely that a party keeps the WH for 3 consecutive terms, but that’s not written in stone by Moses. That wasn’t the reason Trump won, it’s just another statistic. Like Bush Sr was a statistical outlier. Another statistic....we’ve NEVER had a more unpopular president (when looking at average approval) going back to FDR.
Alan
Alan
Results from president's physical are in.
Individual-1 is now officially obese.
Fat hurts wrote:
Results from president's physical are in.
Individual-1 is now officially obese.
Hmmm . . . . that should be morbidly obese. Fake physical.
Rigged by Sally wrote:
Sally Vix [Rigged by Hillary] wrote:
So many good things are happening. The Mueller probe is proving to be a sham. The economy is roaring along! Black and Hispanic unemployment are at historic lows. North Korea hasn't launched a missile in more than 6 months. NASDAQ has gone up 20% in just two months. The Wall IS going to be built and the crisis at the border is about to get resolved. So many great things for the country.
A perfect parody of Rigged, Sally boy.
Why the anger?
Sally Vix wrote:
Rigged by Sally wrote:
A perfect parody of Rigged, Sally boy.
Why the anger?
That poster's comment doesn't contain any anger. Do you even know that word means?
Anger wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Why the anger?
That poster's comment doesn't contain any anger. Do you even know that word means?
Calling me "Sally Boy" when that is not my name denotes some misguided hostility.
Sally Vix wrote:
Anger wrote:
That poster's comment doesn't contain any anger. Do you even know that word means?
Calling me "Sally Boy" when that is not my name denotes some misguided hostility.
You stated you have a wife. Are you not a boy?