Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Uh Oh, more bad news for Clownpole.

Senate Intel Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into 2016 election having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia, according to Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

sure is interesting wording don't you think?

Here's one way to look at it:

Rs make a direct line between:

Benghazi and HRC, despite zero evidence she did anything wrong

Fast and Furious and Obama, despite zero evidence he did anything wrong

IRS-Conservative orgs and Obama, despite zero evidence he did anything wrong.

But Rs are not willing to draw any lines between Trump and collusion.

Go figure.

There was no direct evidence against Nixon either, until his own words on his own tape.

agip wrote:

Here's one way to look at it:

Rs make a direct line between:

Benghazi and HRC, despite zero evidence she did anything wrong

Fast and Furious and Obama, despite zero evidence he did anything wrong

IRS-Conservative orgs and Obama, despite zero evidence he did anything wrong.

But Rs are not willing to draw any lines between Trump and collusion.

Go figure.

Yup. Accurate. Compelling and rich.

agip wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Hardly bad news for me. I haven't put any stock into that investigation (really never even refer to it), and you shouldn't either. Robert Mueller is the pro in this area, the SDNY is the pro in this area, the other DOJ offices engaging in investigations into Trump and those who surround him are the pros in this area, not the Republican-led Senate.

But, to each his own, brother. If you want to find some fake joy in whatever the Senate declares, then have at it.

virtually every organization trump is associated with is under investigation. He simply does not know how to do things legally and ethically.

If the Mueller investigation ended today it would be regarded as the most damning investigations into a campaign and administration in the history of the nation. Even if Trump himself is not accused of anything.

Correct!

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Hardly bad news for me. I haven't put any stock into that investigation (really never even refer to it), and you shouldn't either. Robert Mueller is the pro in this area, the SDNY is the pro in this area, the other DOJ offices engaging in investigations into Trump and those who surround him are the pros in this area, not the Republican-led Senate.

But, to each his own, brother. If you want to find some fake joy in whatever the Senate declares, then have at it.

Flagpole - you have been saying this for more than two years now. Do you have any idea how pathetic you look? It appears now that Mueller will not release any information about his report. All your pathetic clamoring will be for naught. Another gigantic hickey on you. Cheers bro!

Yes, that is correct, he has for 2 years. But...excuses will be flying all over his posts. The bottom line, he thinks he's always right. To be married to him would be pure torture...divorce would be imminent.

TTH wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Uh Oh, more bad news for Clownpole.

Senate Intel Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into 2016 election having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia, according to Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

sure is interesting wording don't you think?

Elaborate, brother.

Flagpole wrote:

agip wrote:

virtually every organization trump is associated with is under investigation. He simply does not know how to do things legally and ethically.

If the Mueller investigation ended today it would be regarded as the most damning investigations into a campaign and administration in the history of the nation. Even if Trump himself is not accused of anything.

Correct!

FALSE! Flagpole said, REPEATEDLY, if he's not convicted of anything, he's not guilty, just like Hillary Clinton. Watch him deny posting that. Now comes the back peddling and excuses. You are the perfect example of a liberal, to a T!

Yup. That pretty much sums it up. wrote:

agip wrote:

Here's one way to look at it:

Rs make a direct line between:

Benghazi and HRC, despite zero evidence she did anything wrong

Fast and Furious and Obama, despite zero evidence he did anything wrong

IRS-Conservative orgs and Obama, despite zero evidence he did anything wrong.

But Rs are not willing to draw any lines between Trump and collusion.

Go figure.

Yup. Accurate. Compelling and rich.

+1

Flagpole wrote:

TTH wrote:

sure is interesting wording don't you think?

Elaborate, brother.

Why the qualifier in the conclusion?

Flagpole wrote:

alpha wrote:

Flagpole is not socially aware enough to see he's clearly beaten, broken and discredited far beyond the point of (ir) relevance.

Flagpole comeback?

1. No I'm not.

2. No I didn't.

3. I know you are but what am I.

4. See, I told you so.

5. I'm super smart, super wealthy, super normal, have big muscles and a hot wife.

6. You're stupid and ignorant because you don't agree with me.

7. I'm always right! (See 1-6)

I am right until I have been proven wrong. I have not been clearly beaten or beaten in any way. You saying so with no evidence doesn't make it so. Ridiculous to say I am not right about Trump when we still have now 18 separate investigations out involving him or people surrounding him.

Evidence? How about 2440 pages of your garbage prediction posts.

Conflating your ego with reality doesn't help your case. You should see a therapist, you may have BPD.

If you hold a political office, wear blackface and are a democrat - you get to keep your job.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzOaCieXcAIjK42?format=jpg&name=small

Trump catching some heat from Ann Coulter as he mulls whether to sign off on the bipartisan spending bill:

"Trump talks a good game on the border wall but it's increasingly clear he's afraid to fight for it," Coulter tweeted to her 2.13 million followers. "Call this his 'Yellow New Deal.'"

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/coulter-calls-border-agreement-trumps-yellow-new-deal/ar-BBTvd4w?li=BBnbfcL

If I recall correctly, he spoke in the SOTU about compromise and working together. Well, the Democrats compromised, giving him money for 55 miles of barrier and giving up their demand that the number of ICE detentions be limited.

What this boils down to is whether Trump has the guts to stand up to the right wing of the Republican party. He hasn't shown much stomach for doing so, but he doesn't really have any good options right now. To about 90% of the country, he'll look like a real hypocrite if he vetoes a negotiated, bipartisan bill. And he still won't get the wall built.

The Man & The Legend wrote:

Yeah, I guess I have mistyped many times before writing letters to my boyfriend. Good DOG, gosh I am stupid and Biased:):):)! Gosh I'm such a little sissy.

Signed,

The Man & The Legend

"Bias person" is NOT a mistyping of "biased person". It is the language of an ignoramus.

dummm farthead wrote:

The Man & The Legend wrote:

Try "biasED person", moron!

Good DOG, you are stupid!

Triggered over someone spelling a word wrong. Good God, you must be a homo or just plain stupid---or both. I think I know the answer.

Ummm . . . nope. That is not a misspelling. That is a moronic and patently incorrect choice of words by someone who is an ignoramus.

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole - you have been saying this for more than two years now. Do you have any idea how pathetic you look? It appears now that Mueller will not release any information about his report. All your pathetic clamoring will be for naught. Another gigantic hickey on you. Cheers bro!

How pathetic he looks? Would that be anything like how pathetic some dude named Sally has been shown to be here?

snicker, snicker

Sally Vix wrote:

Flagpole - I rarely visit this thread but when I do I get a rebuttal from you almost instantaneously. Do you just monitor this thread 24/7? Seriously. I posted one response and you have a rebuttal within seconds. Do you not have a life?

Sally . . . YAWN . . . you post here all the time. Your lies are blatant. You steal names, and post under a huge number of handles. So, shove it, Rigged.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

If you hold a political office, wear blackface and are a democrat - you get to keep your job.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DzOaCieXcAIjK42?format=jpg&name=small

Though I am completely against this kind of behavior and if proven should always be grounds for resignation it speaks volumes about the trump loving mouth breathers in Virginia who he is appeasing by refusing to stand down... You already knew that but wanted to get your little jab in there.

jesseriley wrote:

There was no direct evidence against Nixon either, until his own words on his own tape.

Which is why Trump will last until the 2020 election. There’s no proof beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew of any of the illegal deeds of his campaign associates nor is there any proof, other than he said/she said, that he directed them to make these illegal actions. He’ll claim ignorance. Worked for Reagan.

Without the tape Nixon would have survived.

Alan