The Man & The Legend wrote:
The Man & The Legend wrote:
I understand now. Someone has bias towards another person. Wow, I realize now how retarded I sound. Sorry mate, and yes, Hillary did suck.
Try "biasED person", moron!
Good DOG, you are stupid!
Triggered over someone spelling a word wrong. Good God, you must be a homo or just plain stupid---or both. I think I know the answer.
Yes, he's a turd wrote:
He did say it'll be the biggest I told you so in Letsrun history and may have said the same thing about Kavanaugh. I wouldn't waste one second looking it up, unless I was paid to do so.
Flagpole is an insecure liar and has the "not in my backyard" liberal mindset. One day this country will be too far gone and have no chance of returning to its prior self. Flagpole will be guilty as will his friends.
1) Said it about Trump and the 2016 election only. Did NOT say it about Kavanaugh. I can say this about the 2016 election, because I will be proven right when conspiracy is shown to help Trump win, something I accounted for. The biggest "I Told You So" in the history of Letsrun is still coming from me to you Trumpers. It will be just one time unless I am challenged on it, and I won't name names of posters here because I am righteous yet kind.
2) Not insecure. VERY secure.
3) Not a liar. A truth teller.
4) Would like to see proof that I have a "not in my backyard" mindset (something that is not a liberal condition by the way). You won't be able to show proof. I know it. You know it. The American people know it.
5) I won't be guilty of anything other than being cool as all get out or having HUGE biceps or being super smart or handsome or athletic or musically brilliant.
Da, comrade!
The jerk store only accepts rubles!
Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Uh Oh, more bad news for Clownpole.
Senate Intel Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into 2016 election having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia, according to Democrats and Republicans on the committee.
Hardly bad news for me. I haven't put any stock into that investigation (really never even refer to it), and you shouldn't either. Robert Mueller is the pro in this area, the SDNY is the pro in this area, the other DOJ offices engaging in investigations into Trump and those who surround him are the pros in this area, not the Republican-led Senate.
But, to each his own, brother. If you want to find some fake joy in whatever the Senate declares, then have at it.
Flagpole - you have been saying this for more than two years now. Do you have any idea how pathetic you look? It appears now that Mueller will not release any information about his report. All your pathetic clamoring will be for naught. Another gigantic hickey on you. Cheers bro!
#HUGEbiceps
#micropenis
#steroidconfidence
#sillynarcississt
#flagpoleloveshillary
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Hardly bad news for me. I haven't put any stock into that investigation (really never even refer to it), and you shouldn't either. Robert Mueller is the pro in this area, the SDNY is the pro in this area, the other DOJ offices engaging in investigations into Trump and those who surround him are the pros in this area, not the Republican-led Senate.
But, to each his own, brother. If you want to find some fake joy in whatever the Senate declares, then have at it.
Flagpole - you have been saying this for more than two years now. Do you have any idea how pathetic you look? It appears now that Mueller will not release any information about his report. All your pathetic clamoring will be for naught. Another gigantic hickey on you. Cheers bro!
1) The length of time just shows how long ago I saw this all coming.
2) The House has said it will do everything it can to make this information public.
3) The SDNY and other offices that were fed info from Mueller also will have findings, and Mueller gets credit for their birth.
4) The fact that you cling to the hope that Mueller's findings won't be made public shows that you know it is stuff that would hurt Trump, because you actually DO know that he's a criminal. You should not hope for information to be kept private. That's for guilty people.
WTF!?!?
So, the mouthbreathing t@rds that elected a moron as POTUS are the ones who need “special help” financial / economically?
Flagpole is not socially aware enough to see he's clearly beaten, broken and discredited far beyond the point of (ir) relevance.
Flagpole comeback?
1. No I'm not.
2. No I didn't.
3. I know you are but what am I.
4. See, I told you so.
5. I'm super smart, super wealthy, super normal, have big muscles and a hot wife.
6. You're stupid and ignorant because you don't agree with me.
7. I'm always right! (See 1-6)
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole - you have been saying this for more than two years now. Do you have any idea how pathetic you look? It appears now that Mueller will not release any information about his report. All your pathetic clamoring will be for naught. Another gigantic hickey on you. Cheers bro!
1) The length of time just shows how long ago I saw this all coming.
2) The House has said it will do everything it can to make this information public.
3) The SDNY and other offices that were fed info from Mueller also will have findings, and Mueller gets credit for their birth.
4) The fact that you cling to the hope that Mueller's findings won't be made public shows that you know it is stuff that would hurt Trump, because you actually DO know that he's a criminal. You should not hope for information to be kept private. That's for guilty people.
Flagpole - I rarely visit this thread but when I do I get a rebuttal from you almost instantaneously. Do you just monitor this thread 24/7? Seriously. I posted one response and you have a rebuttal within seconds. Do you not have a life?
Snowflakes in whitetrashistan (aka Trump country) need fed help wrote:
WTF!?!?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-chairman-powell-addresses-uneven-nature-of-u-s-economic-expansion-11549993500So, the mouthbreathing t@rds that elected a moron as POTUS are the ones who need “special help” financial / economically?
Not surprising. Those in rural area that support Trump should follow the GOPs own advice when it comes to achieving economic success—which, the GOP being the GOP—does not include any help from BIG GOVERNMENT. Here is the GOPs strategy for economic success...
1) Locate your boot straps
2) Pull up on them real hard!
3) ?????
4) PROFIT!
Brilliant and logical!
alpha wrote:
Flagpole is not socially aware enough to see he's clearly beaten, broken and discredited far beyond the point of (ir) relevance.
Flagpole comeback?
1. No I'm not.
2. No I didn't.
3. I know you are but what am I.
4. See, I told you so.
5. I'm super smart, super wealthy, super normal, have big muscles and a hot wife.
6. You're stupid and ignorant because you don't agree with me.
7. I'm always right! (See 1-6)
I am right until I have been proven wrong. I have not been clearly beaten or beaten in any way. You saying so with no evidence doesn't make it so. Ridiculous to say I am not right about Trump when we still have now 18 separate investigations out involving him or people surrounding him.
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
1) The length of time just shows how long ago I saw this all coming.
2) The House has said it will do everything it can to make this information public.
3) The SDNY and other offices that were fed info from Mueller also will have findings, and Mueller gets credit for their birth.
4) The fact that you cling to the hope that Mueller's findings won't be made public shows that you know it is stuff that would hurt Trump, because you actually DO know that he's a criminal. You should not hope for information to be kept private. That's for guilty people.
Flagpole - I rarely visit this thread but when I do I get a rebuttal from you almost instantaneously. Do you just monitor this thread 24/7? Seriously. I posted one response and you have a rebuttal within seconds. Do you not have a life?
Funny. Earlier today someone else said I was avoiding answering because I didn't like something that was said...so, I'm either on this site all the time and have no life or I am no where to be found because I don't like some news or something that was posted here. Can't be both things.
agip wrote:
Because trump can't look ahead past lunchtime, and he thought the Rs would hold on to congress.
Here are some ways trump may be able to build a wall without congress, per CNN:
Accessing Treasury forfeiture funds
An estimated $680 million
Would not require the President to declare a national emergency.
Includes unobligated funds from participating agencies that can be used to support law enforcement activities.
After the Office of Management and Budget reviews the order, Treasury and the Department of Homeland Security would both notify Congress then wait 15 days before the funds can be obligated.
Acquisition of land is allowed under this option.
Using USC 284 to divert some Pentagon funds for counter-narcotics
An estimated $700 million
May not require the President to declare a national emergency, according to a CRS legal report.
DHS must exercise a waiver to transfer counter-drug funds to construct fencing to block drug smuggling.
DHS asks Department of Defense to assist after identifying a location where a fence is needed to block drug smuggling corridor.
Using USC 2808 to gain access to military construction funds
An estimated $3.6 billion
Would require the President to declare a national emergency.
Would require the use of the military.
The President would declare border protection a Defense Department mission.
Use Army Corps civil works funds using USC 2293
An estimated $3 billion
May require the President to declare a national emergency, but could also be used without a national emergency, according to a CRS legal report.
The Secretary of the Army may stop or defer Army civil works projects and apply funds to help build civil defense projects essential for the national defense (Secretary of the Army makes the final determination if essential to national defense)
The unspent funds that could be used are now designated to go toward Army Corps of Engineers projects to repair infrastructure damaged by natural disasters.
I think all of these would be challenged in court and likely not supported by Congress who generally don't like when appropriation of funds is made without their consent. So he may try it but I'm not sure it works. As to whether any of this would please Ann Coulter I'm not sure but that seems to be the goal here for the base.....please Ann Coulter.
Flagpole wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole - I rarely visit this thread but when I do I get a rebuttal from you almost instantaneously. Do you just monitor this thread 24/7? Seriously. I posted one response and you have a rebuttal within seconds. Do you not have a life?
Funny. Earlier today someone else said I was avoiding answering because I didn't like something that was said...so, I'm either on this site all the time and have no life or I am no where to be found because I don't like some news or something that was posted here. Can't be both things.
Well, I only visited this thread in first time in days and your responded in minutes. So, either a coincidence or you lay prey here.
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
But, to each his own, brother.
Flagpole ... Cheers bro!
Someone just asked for Sally/RiggedPIO and here s/him comes.
Snowflakes in whitetrashistan (aka Trump country) need fed help wrote:
WTF!?!?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-chairman-powell-addresses-uneven-nature-of-u-s-economic-expansion-11549993500So, the mouthbreathing t@rds that elected a moron as POTUS are the ones who need “special help” financial / economically?
Yes, Trumpers are socialist at heart.
BBC reporter files firsthand account of being assaulted at trump rally.
Democrats lose again wrote:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-has-uncovered-no-direct-evidence-conspiracy-between-trump-campaign-n970536How’s that Russian collusion working out for you democrat pieces of trash?
Hahahahahaha!!!!!
Democrats (aka gays) lose again!!!!
Certainly some interesting wording from the fine Republican Senate Committee.
Rigged by Sally wrote:
Sally Vix wrote:
Flagpole ... Cheers bro!
Someone just asked for Sally/RiggedPIO and here s/him comes.
Go look at all the other pages here. I only came here recently. You are nuts if you think I am Rigged. I am only Sally, Fatty and Polly.