HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! wrote:
Let's be clear: You can make this stuff up--but with this guy, you don't have to.
"Since the founding of our nation, many of our greatest strides – from gaining our independence to abolition of civil rights to extending the vote for women – have been led by people of faith."
Donald J (Moran) Trump, National Prayer Breakfast, February 7, 2019.
Bigly-Moran, Trump wrote:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! wrote:
Let's be clear: You can make this stuff up--but with this guy, you don't have to.
"Since the founding of our nation, many of our greatest strides – from gaining our independence to abolition of civil rights to extending the vote for women – have been led by people of faith."
Donald J (Moran) Trump, National Prayer Breakfast, February 7, 2019.
And just two weeks ago, he said this: "When I say something that you might think is a gaffe, it’s on purpose; it’s not a gaffe. "
You heard him, folks--HE SAID IT ON PURPOSE.
https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-state-of-the-union-insults-lunch-1cfd502a-5c95-477d-81ea-fdc9c4abd771.htmlSorry, he made that "on purpose" crack two DAYS ago.
Paul Erickson has been indicted.
Sally Vix wrote:
UR incorrect wrote:
Medically: Babies born before 24 weeks of gestation are usually considered “unviable” to save.
We are not talking about 24 weeks. We are talking about viable babies who HAVE BEEN BORN AND ARE LIVING. Do you not get how sick that is?
Check your source - in the interview the question was posed regarding an infant that was alive but was not expected to be that way in the very near future. Northam said "that would be a decision between the mother and her doctor" This has always been the position of Pro Choice - between and women and her doctor.
It's funny how the best way to know when a Trumpee / Repulicon is on the ropes they bring up Roe v Wade and abortion in general.
Carry on ignoring the Trump crime family and their continued sham.
BTW - have done any background reading on our Sec of Labor? He is truly a gem. Drain the Swamp - right into the Cabinet!!!
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/article225624945.htmlKing of Regurgitation... wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
This is all crazy. We have the most criminal President by far that we have ever had, and Trumpers want to talk about what a buffoon Democrat Governor from Virginia (who has lost all political clout) thinks about abortion. His opinion on abortion is as important as Kim Kardashian's.
Deflection, deflection, deflection.
There currently is NO EQUIVALENCY to Trump in US politics. He's the story. He always wanted to be the only story in town, and ironically now that he has it, Trumpers want to take the spotlight off of him. Let Trump have his day in the sun you Trumpers!
He's a serial liar and a criminal of epic proportions. You Trumpers should not be supporting him in any way. What are you supporting? He lies all the time, even to you, and directly to your faces. I hope you are using plenty of lube.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
This ending in Flaggy's post can be seen a year ago. The King of Regurgitation. If I repeat it enough, my sheep followers, LL and Fat Hurts will believe it and bow to me even more.
1) The length of time I have said this just shows how prescient I am and was when I began.
2) I have no followers here and do not want any. The posters you mention disagree with me with regularity and with each other sometimes too. You lump all of us together because we represent the intellectual part of Letsrun who happen to be correct with regard to the criminality that is Donald Trump, we agree more often than not, but we are all our own people.
Runningart2004 wrote:
I wonder what will happen to this thread after the 2020 election, assuming Trump loses.
I wonder what will happen to Trump. I’m unconvinced that there will be enough to impeach in. I’m unconvinced there will be enough to indict on post-presidency. This ain’t his first rodeo with the authorities
My guess is he remains relevant through Twitter until 2024 and runs again.
Another thing. The “Democratic Socialist” wing of the Democratic Party reminds me of the Tea Party.
This country doesn’t need far right or far left leaders. It’s need centrist leaders who can bridge the gap between the psychos on the fringe.
Sadly fiscal conservativism or even a balanced budget is extinct. So wild expensive ideas like “Medicare for all” and “free college” get traction. Add to this cutting taxes until infinity and we wonder why we have such a huge deficit.
So they’ll find a way to make it look like their ideas are being paid for or make it look like tax cuts follow some wonky economics to generate more revenue.
Meanwhile the deficit increases.
Alan
Why do you think he won't be indicted over the FELONY Campaign Finance violations for which Michael Cohen is going to do time? Those charges aren't even going to be federal ones, so Pence or some other President can't even pardon him. His only saving grace there is if his imprisonment is wiped away due to a plea agreement OR the Governor of New York pardons him.
Why do you think he will avoid an indictment here? Just by virtue of being Donald Trump? Maybe you know something I don't, but from what I see, he is going to prison.
Democrats lose again!!!!
Runningart2004 wrote:
People on both sides lose their ever loving mind on this issue.
Let’s use some common sense:
1. You shouldn’t be allowed to get an abortion without a valid medical reason or in cases of rape/incest.
2. The decision to abort should be based on a sound medical decision between the mother and doctor no matter when it is during the pregnancy.
If you have 10 kids and get knocked up sorry bout your luck. You live with the consequences of your decision.
If the fetus isn’t viable or endangers your life or is a result of rape or incest then you should have the option to end the pregnancy.
Common sense.
Alan
No...I don't agree that that is common sense. So, you don't believe Roe vs. Wade should stand. I won't debate that because that is an endless debate that I am not interested enough in engaging in, but I will just say I disagree.
You people (deflection by Trumpers) are getting too far from the topic of this thread -- Donald J. Trump.
I will put it back on course.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Weight gain is coming.
Clown weighs a ton.
In about a week, Individual-1 will make a big decision on the wall. I see these choices:
1. Shut down the government again.
2. Declare a national emergency.
3. Cave again.
4. Do a deal with Democrats, giving them some things they really want like DACA or minimum wage hike.
5. Invade Venezuela and hope everybody forgets about the wall.
Which do you think it will be?
Fat hurts wrote:
In about a week, Individual-1 will make a big decision on the wall. I see these choices:
1. Shut down the government again.
2. Declare a national emergency.
3. Cave again.
4. Do a deal with Democrats, giving them some things they really want like DACA or minimum wage hike.
5. Invade Venezuela and hope everybody forgets about the wall.
Which do you think it will be?
Trump will build a cave in lieu of the wall and claim it as VICTORY!
Trollminator>>>Lost it wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Nice - we’ve got a new handle stealer, equipped with registered name and all. Got a lot of time on your hands huh?
Do you not see the irony in your post? You live on here Moron:)! You're upset because Hellary Clinton (correct spelling) lost. You don't believe any link but your own. Just look at all of your posts, this thread is YOUR LIFE you 60 year old cretin.
Looks like he’s doing a great job of trolling seeing as it didn’t take much to trigger you there
Flagpole wrote:
You people (deflection by Trumpers) are getting too far from the topic of this thread -- Donald J. Trump.
I will put it back on course.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
In December 2018 a court ruled that a foreign government did interfere in the election, but it wasn't Russia. It was Ukrainian Members of Parliament- and it was for Hillary and she still lost.
Mueller never
Clownpole forever
Democrats lose again wrote:
http://thefederalist.com/2019/02/07/ten-most-insane-requirements-green-new-deal/
Central America will soon be uninhabitable. If you want to end mass migration, you better get on board with renewable energy.
Runningart2004 wrote:
People on both sides lose their ever loving mind on this issue.
Let’s use some common sense:
1. You shouldn’t be allowed to get an abortion without a valid medical reason or in cases of rape/incest.
2. The decision to abort should be based on a sound medical decision between the mother and doctor no matter when it is during the pregnancy.
If you have 10 kids and get knocked up sorry bout your luck. You live with the consequences of your decision.
If the fetus isn’t viable or endangers your life or is a result of rape or incest then you should have the option to end the pregnancy.
Common sense.
Alan
I have to disagree wholeheartedly. If you really want to use common sense as a basis then we should all be for abortions right up until birth with very few restrictions. For one, our legal system doesn’t afford rights to those who are not yet born. It does however in many cases force pregnant women to keep their fetus inside until birth. It’s a bit hypocritical and even strange when you consider that the law doesn’t otherwise prevent anyone from killing (albeit more slowly) their biological material through smoking, alcohol, drugs and dangerous activities. Also, there is no question from an economic point of view that society can always benefit from having one less mouth to feed. Not to mention the whole issue of the human footprint having inflicted so much destruction on the planet, so less people is a good thing.
So I’ll put this out there, if it makes sense for abortions to happen only for a valid medical reason, then why are pregnant women allowed to smoke, drink and do other things that effective are killing their baby? In essence, not having such restrictions is confirmation that it is their right to be pregnant —- but not to end a pregnancy? That is what doesn’t make sense.
Now all that aside, sure I completely understand why my common sense above doesn’t work... religion, human rights and in general emotions all weigh heavily on this issue. I get all that, but still if you want to use common sense then we should all be clearly pro-choice.
Trollminator wrote:
Runningart2004 wrote:
People on both sides lose their ever loving mind on this issue.
Let’s use some common sense:
1. You shouldn’t be allowed to get an abortion without a valid medical reason or in cases of rape/incest.
2. The decision to abort should be based on a sound medical decision between the mother and doctor no matter when it is during the pregnancy.
If you have 10 kids and get knocked up sorry bout your luck. You live with the consequences of your decision.
If the fetus isn’t viable or endangers your life or is a result of rape or incest then you should have the option to end the pregnancy.
Common sense.
Alan
I have to disagree wholeheartedly. If you really want to use common sense as a basis then we should all be for abortions right up until birth with very few restrictions. For one, our legal system doesn’t afford rights to those who are not yet born. It does however in many cases force pregnant women to keep their fetus inside until birth. It’s a bit hypocritical and even strange when you consider that the law doesn’t otherwise prevent anyone from killing (albeit more slowly) their biological material through smoking, alcohol, drugs and dangerous activities. Also, there is no question from an economic point of view that society can always benefit from having one less mouth to feed. Not to mention the whole issue of the human footprint having inflicted so much destruction on the planet, so less people is a good thing.
So I’ll put this out there, if it makes sense for abortions to happen only for a valid medical reason, then why are pregnant women allowed to smoke, drink and do other things that effective are killing their baby? In essence, not having such restrictions is confirmation that it is their right to be pregnant —- but not to end a pregnancy? That is what doesn’t make sense.
Now all that aside, sure I completely understand why my common sense above doesn’t work... religion, human rights and in general emotions all weigh heavily on this issue. I get all that, but still if you want to use common sense then we should all be clearly pro-choice.
Btw - before everyone loses their minds over my comments I want to clarify those are not my views, I’m just debating how much broader the question is and how so much is a matter of bias and perspective.
Flagpole wrote:
Why do you think he won't be indicted over the FELONY Campaign Finance violations for which Michael Cohen is going to do time? Those charges aren't even going to be federal ones, so Pence or some other President can't even pardon him. His only saving grace there is if his imprisonment is wiped away due to a plea agreement OR the Governor of New York pardons him.
Why do you think he will avoid an indictment here? Just by virtue of being Donald Trump? Maybe you know something I don't, but from what I see, he is going to prison.
Ummm.. I thought Cohen was indicted by SDNY on federal campaign finance violations. If Individual-1 is a co-conspirator, he will also face federal charges. Cohen is also investigated on Trump Foundations tax issues by the NY state. But no charge has been filed on that yet.
So as of today, Trump can avoid jail time if the next president pardons him. That may change in future.