Another right-wing fever dream bites the dust. But on to the next, you know. The rubes will always accept the new conspiracy theory from Fox.
WaPo
David Weiss, the federal prosecutor tapped to serve as special counsel investigating Hunter Biden, testified Tuesday behind closed doors to a House committee, telling lawmakers that he has had full authority over the case and has not been overruled at any point by other Justice Department officials.
That's the big lie? I had to just look up who the guy was. If I said I saw reports his heart stopped, then I did see reports that his heart had stopped. What's the point about lying about that?
Stop moving the goalposts - you wanted an example and I gave you one. That you can't even remember the lie proves the point that it's not anomalous. It's part of your being.
I am called a big liar and that's what you come up with? Not even a lie for God's sakes.
Stop moving the goalposts - you wanted an example and I gave you one. That you can't even remember the lie proves the point that it's not anomalous. It's part of your being.
I am called a big liar and that's what you come up with? Not even a lie for God's sakes.
1) It is a lie. 2) You asked for AN example and I gave one.
Stop moving the goalposts - you wanted an example and I gave you one. That you can't even remember the lie proves the point that it's not anomalous. It's part of your being.
I am called a big liar and that's what you come up with? Not even a lie for God's sakes.
you think jews run the country with some malevolent plan.
that's called a big lie. One of the biggest. Pioneered by your co-believers the National Socialists.
You can never claim to be truthful because the big lie dqs you from honesty.
"A big lie (German: große Lüge) is a gross distortion or misrepresentation of the truth primarily used as a political propaganda technique.[1][2] The German expression was first used by Adolf Hitler in his book Mein Kampf (1925) to describe how people could be induced to believe so colossal a lie because they would not believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously". Hitler claimed that the technique had been used by Jews to blame Germany's loss in World War I on German general Erich Ludendorff, who was a prominent nationalist political leader in the Weimar Republic."
A big lie (German: große Lüge) is a gross distortion or misrepresentation of the truth primarily used as a political propaganda technique. The German expression was first used by Adolf Hitler in his book Mein Kampf (1925) to...
Dig a little deeper. What constitutes a hate crime against Jews?
Watch the Israeli film "Defamation".
The ADL was pressed to come up with some examples of these hate crimes and the very worst they could come up with was when a few black kids threw rocks at a bus with Jewish kids on it. Nobody was hurt, most of the kids were sleeping and did not wake up, and its far from clear that the rock throwers even knew the kids on the bus were Jewish.
If you think Jews face more hate crimes than Arabs, Muslims, Mexican, Pakistanis you are way too naive
Here is hate crime data from NYC. Feel free to do your own analysis. The most detailed data is the annual arrest by bias motivation. It gives detailed information on the type of crime and the race and gender of the offender. Might change your perspective on who commits modern hate crimes and against whom:
How can anyone possibly believe more hate crimes are committed against Jews than Muslims?
If someone draws a swastika in chalk it is reported as a hate crime vs. Jews. I know this to be a fact cuz it happened in my town. Drawn in chalk on a path in a playground. Even hit the Boston Globe! Nobody knows who did it, nobody paid any attention to it. It's not even a crime. Yet it hits the stats as a hate crime vs. Jews.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
The current trial is total BS and only confirms what his base believes about the vendetta which is being pursued by James. They need to move heaven and earth to get the Jan. 6th trial in. This is the one that matters. No red state voter is going to believe anything about the NY fraud trial or the secret documents case. The trials where a good number of base voters will actually pay attention to the facts of the case will be the Jan 6th one. I would like to get this one get settled before the election so that all the cards are on the table for voters. The James case is personal and selective, but the Jan 6th one is important and substantial.
The current trial is total BS and only confirms what his base believes about the vendetta which is being pursued by James. They need to move heaven and earth to get the Jan. 6th trial in. This is the one that matters. No red state voter is going to believe anything about the NY fraud trial or the secret documents case. The trials where a good number of base voters will actually pay attention to the facts of the case will be the Jan 6th one. I would like to get this one get settled before the election so that all the cards are on the table for voters. The James case is personal and selective, but the Jan 6th one is important and substantial.
Relax dude; half the country is going to vote for a civilly liable rapist regardless of how these court cases shake out. We are so corrupt as a nation we don’t have the balls to throw him in jail because that means half a congress would have to go with him.
Here is hate crime data from NYC. Feel free to do your own analysis. The most detailed data is the annual arrest by bias motivation. It gives detailed information on the type of crime and the race and gender of the offender. Might change your perspective on who commits modern hate crimes and against whom:
How can anyone possibly believe more hate crimes are committed against Jews than Muslims?
If someone draws a swastika in chalk it is reported as a hate crime vs. Jews. I know this to be a fact cuz it happened in my town. Drawn in chalk on a path in a playground. Even hit the Boston Globe! Nobody knows who did it, nobody paid any attention to it. It's not even a crime. Yet it hits the stats as a hate crime vs. Jews.
The US government says Jews here make up 2.4% yet 60% of hate crimes here are committed against Jews.
How can anyone possibly believe more hate crimes are committed against Jews than Muslims?
If someone draws a swastika in chalk it is reported as a hate crime vs. Jews. I know this to be a fact cuz it happened in my town. Drawn in chalk on a path in a playground. Even hit the Boston Globe! Nobody knows who did it, nobody paid any attention to it. It's not even a crime. Yet it hits the stats as a hate crime vs. Jews.
The US government says Jews here make up 2.4% yet 60% of hate crimes here are committed against Jews.
"Reported single-bias anti-Jewish hate crime incidents in the country sharply rose by more than 37%, reaching 1,122 incidents, the highest number recorded in almost three decades and the second-highest number on record."
The current trial is total BS and only confirms what his base believes about the vendetta which is being pursued by James. They need to move heaven and earth to get the Jan. 6th trial in. This is the one that matters. No red state voter is going to believe anything about the NY fraud trial or the secret documents case. The trials where a good number of base voters will actually pay attention to the facts of the case will be the Jan 6th one. I would like to get this one get settled before the election so that all the cards are on the table for voters. The James case is personal and selective, but the Jan 6th one is important and substantial.
Relax dude; half the country is going to vote for a civilly liable rapist regardless of how these court cases shake out. We are so corrupt as a nation we don’t have the balls to throw him in jail because that means half a congress would have to go with him.
Lots of independents vote only on economy/business outlook. Things were pretty good for the majority of Trump's presidency and I think he could win off of that.
you guys are the ones who made it legal to spend virtually unlimited amounts on politics. That's on you people. Dems didn't want that to happen. Citizens United. You can't expect one side to disarm while the other side doesn't.
But this is the Republican world. The world you people insisted on. Virtually unlimited money in politics.
And the Republicans lose again. Banning abortion doesn't seem to be what voters want, even in solidly red states.
NBC:
Ohio voters have added the right to access abortion care to the state’s constitution, NBC News projects — another major political victory for abortion-rights advocates in the nearly 17 months since the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade.
This post was edited 25 seconds after it was posted.
And the Republicans lose again. Banning abortion doesn't seem to be what voters want, even in solidly red states.
NBC:
Ohio voters have added the right to access abortion care to the state’s constitution, NBC News projects — another major political victory for abortion-rights advocates in the nearly 17 months since the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade.
That’s not really a loss. This is how it should have been from the get go. Let each state vote on their own abortion policy. Roe v Wade was flawed from a conservative perspective on the premise, not because it was about abortion. The Supreme Court read a constitutional right into the constitution that wasn’t expressly stated. The striking down of roe v Wade simply affirmed what many people have said for decades: abortion should be left up to the individual states.
Roe v Wade was flawed from a conservative perspective on the premise, not because it was about abortion. The Supreme Court read a constitutional right into the constitution that wasn’t expressly stated. The striking down of roe v Wade simply affirmed what many people have said for decades: abortion should be left up to the individual states.
1. Where is "one man, one vote" expressly stated in the Constitution? Where is "separation of Church and State" expressly stated in the Constitution?
2. But I am glad that you're against a national ban of abortion. In all seriousness, I too think letting the individual states decide is probably the best way to go.
