The attacks on Iran were wholly unprovoked, illegal, and illegitimate.
Unprovoked ignores the decades of attacks on Israel and US interests. Iran’s role in October 7th alone justifies the response.
Truth is the ayatollah wanted to see Israel fall before he died and took unnecessary risks to try to make that happen. So long as the next entity is not a theocracy hell bent on the elimination of Israel, the region actually might have a chance.
I noticed a lot of online financial chat rooms have NO negative comments of the negative effects of the Iran conflict on the market. They seem to be censored out?
Khamenei was a war criminal.....Or do you still think he's still alive?
All of them are war criminals now: Trump, Bibi (Gaza), Bush, Putin we know. But due to their status in the UN and other international councils they'll never be tried for war crimes.
Khamenei was a war criminal.....Or do you still think he's still alive?
All of them are war criminals now: Trump, Bibi (Gaza), Bush, Putin we know. But due to their status in the UN and other international councils they'll never be tried for war crimes.
joedlrt wrote:Iran’s role in October 7th alone justifies the response.
The cool part about Trump not providing a reason for illegally starting a war on Israel's behalf from Mar a Lardo is that his loyal lemmings can just invent their own. "Khamenei was bad! We're bringing freedom! We're avoiding nuclear war! Iran was gonna attack us first, maybe? Whaddabout October 7!? I heard they rigged the 2020 election for the demoncraps!"
Just remember: you born-again neocons own the consequences that follow from this. The ensuing middle eastern instability. The potential terror attacks on US soil. The dead US soldiers. The dead Iranian children and civilians. (Already, you own the many dead school girls Israel bombed.) The economic fall-out. All yours.
The attacks on Iran were wholly unprovoked, illegal, and illegitimate.
Unprovoked ignores the decades of attacks on Israel and US interests. Iran’s role in October 7th alone justifies the response.
If we're going to use historical grievances as a standard, then who should take revenge on America for spraying agent orange in Vietnam or dropping nukes on innocents in Japan? We're the only country to have used the deadliest weapon ever created so we have zero moral authority.
1. We invaded not because the threat was imminent, but because it was not. Iran was weak. 2. The negotiations were a pretext. 3. There was no day after plan. This is, after all, the "let's-see-what-happens" presidency. 4. Hoping the Iranian people will rise up is not a strategy. 5. This is a giant step toward getting more embroiled in the Middle East, exactly what he promised not to do.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.