Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

Trump said that if he had not been elected President that we would be in a major with North Korea. Ok, guess that makes it so.

Yeah, he said it before and that he saved millions of lives and the Olympics. It's a ridiculous claim; Kim does not want to be pulled out of a spider hole and no sane President would initiate an invasion.

Best line of the speech. "America will never be a socialist country". It's on the citizenship exam. America's system of economics is capitalism. Flagpole, are you voting for AOC?

Proud 2B American wrote:

Best line of the speech. "America will never be a socialist country". It's on the citizenship exam. America's system of economics is capitalism. Flagpole, are you voting for AOC?

Vote for her for what? She's from New York. I couldn't vote for her for anything now even if I wanted to.

Proud 2B American wrote:

Best line of the speech. "America will never be a socialist country". It's on the citizenship exam. America's system of economics is capitalism. Flagpole, are you voting for AOC?

Really? Or are you joking?

What if he had said, "America will never turn into a balloon animal"? That would also be true and also be a good thing. Would that be the "best line of the speech"?

America is a democracy. Nothing in the Constitution prevents or allows economic theories. Trump: “What’s a Constitution?”

nancytrump wrote:

Pretty uncool for Trump to basically threaten Congress not to investigate. They will investigate, and when (unrelated) the economy tanks, he'll blame it on the investigation. #sad

Nixon basically said the same thing in his SOTU.

I would be willing to bet Clinton said the same thing about his investigation (might be wrong).

That’s just how these things go.

Alan

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

good person here wrote:

Try to answer the question that was asked. Thanks.

I don’t think any member of Congress is truly racist. I don’t believe the Governor of Virginia is racist and I certainly don’t think President Trump is racist. We spend far much time on identity politics and symbols and not enough on solving real problems. The white dress thing was fake and unnecessary.

I'm with Flagpole on this one. Anyone who supports Trump is racist.

That was perhaps the worst choice of a SOTU response I've seen in 40+ years of watching the SOTU. I guess it is good she didn't take a sip of water.

Wrong choice wrote:

That was perhaps the worst choice of a SOTU response I've seen in 40+ years of watching the SOTU. I guess it is good she didn't take a sip of water.

I thought she was fantastic.

Stacy Abrams gave the best response in recent memory.

Wrong choice wrote:

That was perhaps the worst choice of a SOTU response I've seen in 40+ years of watching the SOTU. I guess it is good she didn't take a sip of water.

Yeah, pretty ridiculous. Why would you put a recent losing candidate up there in the first place? And then have her ramble on trying to stoke "racism" themes the entire time?

But this is what happens when your brain is taken over by T.D.S. Your decision-making skills become that of a spiteful 8 year old.

But look at that, 76% approved of his message. 59% strongly approved. Congress needs to stop the silly butthurt partisanship.

The speech was positive compared to anything else about trump: no bribes were taken; nor trade wars started; nor hurricane relief botched; nor children incarcerated; nor votes suppressed; nor environmental concerns; no tv news watched; no shutdown; etc. Everything everything else, a disaster!

Silly Willy wrote:

Wrong choice wrote:

That was perhaps the worst choice of a SOTU response I've seen in 40+ years of watching the SOTU. I guess it is good she didn't take a sip of water.

Yeah, pretty ridiculous. Why would you put a recent losing candidate up there in the first place? And then have her ramble on trying to stoke "racism" themes the entire time?

You obviously didn't watch the speech. I guess because she is black you think that she was there to stoke racism.

She gave a very powerful, positive speech. Stacy Abrams is super-smart, an inspiring speaker, and a rising star in the Democratic party. She will probably be the next senator from Georgia.

That's why she was chosen.

Fat hurts wrote:

Silly Willy wrote:

Yeah, pretty ridiculous. Why would you put a recent losing candidate up there in the first place? And then have her ramble on trying to stoke "racism" themes the entire time?

You obviously didn't watch the speech. I guess because she is black you think that she was there to stoke racism.

She gave a very powerful, positive speech. Stacy Abrams is super-smart, an inspiring speaker, and a rising star in the Democratic party. She will probably be the next senator from Georgia.

That's why she was chosen.

She had the opportunity to unite, but she chose (likely the Democratic Party) chose to be divisive.

Silly Willy wrote:

Wrong choice wrote:

That was perhaps the worst choice of a SOTU response I've seen in 40+ years of watching the SOTU. I guess it is good she didn't take a sip of water.

Yeah, pretty ridiculous. Why would you put a recent losing candidate up there in the first place? And then have her ramble on trying to stoke "racism" themes the entire time?

But this is what happens when your brain is taken over by T.D.S. Your decision-making skills become that of a spiteful 8 year old.

But look at that, 76% approved of his message. 59% strongly approved. Congress needs to stop the silly butthurt partisanship.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/05/cnn_instant_poll_76_of_viewers_approved_of_trump_state_of_the_union.html

And 72% agreed with Trump on his immigration ideas in the CBS poll. Seventy-two percent.

Hey, I made a guess and it didn't happen. (it's not like said 100% chance or something stupid like that)

Similar to people trying to predict spots scores or running times.

At least I put something out there.

I feel Congress has failed to act on the information that has come to light.

Democrats lose again

L L wrote:

Hey, I made a guess and it didn't happen. (it's not like said 100% chance or something stupid like that)

Similar to people trying to predict spots scores or running times.

At least I put something out there.

I feel Congress has failed to act on the information that has come to light.

Are you sure you didn't put some qualifications on that prediction? It doesn't have to be something you actually did, you know. Just say that the evidence is in a thread that has been deleted.

You WILL be proven right.

No qualifications.

First I said that Trump would resign between March and June this year.

Later I asked people to take a guess at an impeachment date and I said Feb 2 of this year.

No one took me up on the idea of predicting impeachment dates other than those that said it will never happen. So I can't compare that to anyone.

I thought Feb 2 would give the new House a month to cast that vote.

It didn't happen. I can't move that goal post.

I was hoping for that vote to start the gathering and presentment of evidence that would pressure Trump to step down as it got closer to him and his family.

That still may happen.

But if everyone is waiting for Mueller to pull everything together and tie it with a bow anytime soon, that won't happen.

They have to take what they have and run with it or the 2020 election will come before you know it.

Fat hurts wrote:

Silly Willy wrote:

Yeah, pretty ridiculous. Why would you put a recent losing candidate up there in the first place? And then have her ramble on trying to stoke "racism" themes the entire time?

You obviously didn't watch the speech. I guess because she is black you think that she was there to stoke racism.

She gave a very powerful, positive speech. Stacy Abrams is super-smart, an inspiring speaker, and a rising star in the Democratic party. She will probably be the next senator from Georgia.

That's why she was chosen.

Why us she so fat?