How the NYT defends it: The agency said that 70 percent of arrests were of immigrants charged with or convicted of a crime in the United States. But an analysis of federal data by The New York Times shows that fewer than 40 percent had a criminal conviction, and only about 8 percent had been convicted of a violent crime. So "only" 40% were criminals. Their numbers were so far off!
Trump pardoned 1500 violent domestic terrorists in his first day back in office. 100% of them were violent scum that should have been Babbitted. So go f*ck yourself with your “but criminals” BS.
"Under Biden, 1 out of every 4 new jobs went to increase the size of the federal government... Under my administration, 100% of all new jobs created came out of the private sector."
That would be more impressive if the US didn’t lose 2.7 million jobs in Trump’s first term. His second term isn’t going much better.
How the NYT defends it: The agency said that 70 percent of arrests were of immigrants charged with or convicted of a crime in the United States. But an analysis of federal data by The New York Times shows that fewer than 40 percent had a criminal conviction, and only about 8 percent had been convicted of a violent crime. So "only" 40% were criminals. Their numbers were so far off!
Trump pardoned 1500 violent domestic terrorists in his first day back in office. 100% of them were violent scum that should have been Babbitted. So go f*ck yourself with your “but criminals” BS.
Biden let in 11 million violent domestic terrorists.
You're clearly an Anti-American extremist activist. Are you Islamic?
Jensen Huang: “After less than a year, we're now manufacturing the most advanced chips for AI here in the U.S. All of this started with President Trump wanting to re-industrialize the U.S. His tariffs were a pressing agent in making this possible."
Trump pardoned 1500 violent domestic terrorists in his first day back in office. 100% of them were violent scum that should have been Babbitted. So go f*ck yourself with your “but criminals” BS.
Biden let in 11 million violent domestic terrorists.
You're clearly an Anti-American extremist activist. Are you Islamic?
He let in domestic terrorist? Aren’t they then, by definition, not domestic?
You’re clearly mentally challenged. Have you been diagnosed as developmentally handicapped?
Trump socialized with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, but he severed ties around 2004-2007 after learning of Epstein's predatory behavior—banning him from Mar-a-Lago and ceasing contact well before Epstein's 2008 guilty plea to soliciting prostitution from a minor (the first public conviction tied to his pedophilia). There's no documented proof of continued socializing after that point.
After 2007, zero photos, flight logs, or witness accounts show continued socializing. Trump declined Epstein's island invites. Giuffre (recruited at Mar-a-Lago in 2000) accused Prince Andrew but not Trump of abuse, and her family disputes Trump's 2025 retelling as implying prior knowledge. No law enforcement has accused Trump of involvement in Epstein's crimes.
This is a decent account based on what we know, and I don’t expect the files to indicate any prosecutable behavior by the president.
We have numerous other accounts of him being pretty disgusting about women, including very young women and underage pageant contestants but nothing criminal and less salacious than much of what you’ll find in the files. And there are multiple credible accounts of him severing ties with JE and cooperating with investigators. It’s hasty and irresponsible to attempt to strongly accuse him of more without clear evidence. I think the worst-case revelation in the files for him would be another salacious detail (no, not along the lines of the garbage that’s been speculated on in the past week) or perhaps another contact or two after he’d apparently cut all ties. Maybe stronger hints on the “knew about” point. Nothing like outright criminal behavior.
Will there be anything that maybe even shines a light on him as even better in helping investigations? I wouldn’t rule it out, but it seems unlikely.
I doubt he’ll come across as one of the worse offenders, and I think there will be fairly little clear evidence about those worse offenders. Probably little info to serve the interests of justice all that well.
I'm a Trump hater and I agree with the above. I don't think anything directly tying Trump to any criminal activity will be revealed. I do wonder what the twisting themselves into a pretzel to prevent the release of the records by the GOP was all about. It's obviously all about Trump because, to him, everything is about him. It's not going to be something he'd simply be embarrassed about. That's long past an issue he's concerned with on any subject.
My guess is that there's someone or some group of people in there that doesn't want that info out. I'll guess a large donator probably unknown to the public. They may hold something over him that would be a problem for Trump and he doesn't want the potential that that person or persons could sing about.
ah, the 'don't tread on me' guys demanding strong central government action to restrict the free market.
amurrica.
Elections have consequences. Woke AI should be banned federally - don't let states allow woke AI.
Trump likes to ban and outlaw stuff he can’t even define. It works because his cult salivates at the thought of winning culture wars of any type.
BTW, what happened to Bondos announcement that she apprehended the wife of Aunt Tifas founder? Odd that nothing came of that. After all, he was the FOUNDER!
Elections have consequences. Woke AI should be banned federally - don't let states allow woke AI.
Trump likes to ban and outlaw stuff he can’t even define. It works because his cult salivates at the thought of winning culture wars of any type.
BTW, what happened to Bondos announcement that she apprehended the wife of Aunt Tifas founder? Odd that nothing came of that. After all, he was the FOUNDER!
This is severely retarded. Post examples of Trump "outlawing stuff he can't define." In every major case, the policies actually contained explicit criteria, statutory authority, or documented national-security rationales.
He let in domestic terrorist? Aren’t they then, by definition, not domestic?
You’re clearly mentally challenged. Have you been diagnosed as developmentally handicapped?
You have a big problem. Deflection. Deflection. Deflection. You lose again.
You didn't even remotely address my point, yet accuse me of deflection. Trump is a convicted felon, serial rapist, and pedophile who pardoned 1500 domestic terrorists on his first day in office. Trumpers are not "tough on crime". They're disgusting scum that collectively would lose a battle of wits with a wombat.
Trump likes to ban and outlaw stuff he can’t even define. It works because his cult salivates at the thought of winning culture wars of any type.
BTW, what happened to Bondos announcement that she apprehended the wife of Aunt Tifas founder? Odd that nothing came of that. After all, he was the FOUNDER!
This is severely retarded. Post examples of Trump "outlawing stuff he can't define." In every major case, the policies actually contained explicit criteria, statutory authority, or documented national-security rationales.
I am not your Monkey. Do your own research. Start with the hair brained 213 executive orders he signed this year. Lots of insane and unconstitutional, lawless fecel matter in there.
They are more like press releases but Trump acts like they are official proclamations that must immediately be obeyed. A good portion could be legally overturned but the law industry is like, why bother? They are too stupid to even assume anyone would comply.
I generally agree. The most damning stuff for Trump (assuming the DOJ hasn’t already destroyed everything with his name on it) will be evidence that shows that he was aware of what Epstein was doing and still hung around him prior to their breakup. Why would Trump care about it? He’s someone who bragged about barging into the changing room at his teen pageants, walking up to women grabbing them right by the p-ssy and said that he’d be all over Ivanka were she not his daughter. Our great leader!
I've heard much worse in a Men's locker room.
Biden showered with his daughter. Is this acceptable?
You realize these are very old men from a different generation, don't you? When beating your kid with a belt was considered normal. Vietnam era guys. Crazy guys.
Lastly, the proof suggests he cut ties with Epstein years prior to his first conviction indicating he was not aware of what he was doing nor continued hanging out with him. The cryptic emails are inconclusive. I do believe Epstein had motives to smear Trump.
Some details world be helpful:
What have you heard men saying in a locker room that’s worse than wanting to sleep with their daughter or grab women without warning between the legs or spy on underage girls changing? Some specific examples would be helpful to contextualize your perspective.
The same with Biden and his daughter: can you please share all the details you know on this so we can make a judgement on this? Does your very old men standard apply here, where nudity did not imply sex?
There is no way Trump learned about Epstein’s repeat offenses only on the onset of the criminal proceedings. They ran in the same circles for years. Why would Trump care about what Epstein was doing?
Like this stupid sh!t above is what I meant by strawman and disingenuous comment.
It's not though. Do you really trust these people? You call Epstein disgusting and evil, yet you point to his word as the truth. How can you not see that?
Do you not see that your only reply is anger? You don't have a logical counterpoint. El Raton.
At the risk of ever indulging your childish, zealot, lying posts, I didn't point to Epstein's word as the truth, I never said I trusted him, and you haven't made any point from which to counterpoint to.
That said, a normal, interested person would review at the Epstein-Maxwell email and employ all the usual methods of evaluating the accuracy and meaning of any written document - context, language, intended audience, expression, time, motive/intent, cross-referencing, etc.
It's a private email from Epstein to a co-conspirator Maxwell, both of whom have expectations of privacy regarding what is being said between them. It is not a public announcement or an answer to a media interview. The motive to lie in this type of private conversation, especially between two conspirators, is low.
The email is confessional and against the declarant's (Epstein) interests. Saying "[Trump] knew about the girls" acknowledges that "the girls" alleged to have been assaulted by Epstein do indeed exist and that he indeed assaulted them. Statements made by a declarant that are against a declarant's own penal or pecuniary ($$$$$) interests are considered accurate and truthful -- so much so that they are actually exceptions to the rule against admission of hearsay in American courts.
The email uses language indicating that the recipient, who is a co-conspirator, knew the subject matter well. The recipient (G. Maxwell) tacitly acknowledges the accuracy of the statement in the email ("I've been thinking that too"), and she doesn't contradict, qualify, or protest the accuracy of the statement that "[Trump] knew about the girls." That's a high indicia of reliability.
The email does not recite behavior that would be considered much worse. It does not recite "[Trump] knew about the girls and also assaulted them" indicating accuracy and honesty about the expressed extent of Trump's involvement.
The email is drafted years after Epstein's conviction. The email is in the form of a lament and does not express any intention to perform future affirmative acts by Epstein.
So, that's what a normal person would make of the Epstein-Maxwell email where Epstein said "[Trump] knew about the girls."
Trump likes to ban and outlaw stuff he can’t even define. It works because his cult salivates at the thought of winning culture wars of any type.
BTW, what happened to Bondos announcement that she apprehended the wife of Aunt Tifas founder? Odd that nothing came of that. After all, he was the FOUNDER!
This is severely retarded. Post examples of Trump "outlawing stuff he can't define." In every major case, the policies actually contained explicit criteria, statutory authority, or documented national-security rationales.
I can’t speak for oldrunningguy, but Trump admitted to pardoning a cryptocurrency magnate that he had never heard of after this person, unknown to Trump, helped the Trump family launch its cryptocurrency.
You have a big problem. Deflection. Deflection. Deflection. You lose again.
You didn't even remotely address my point, yet accuse me of deflection. Trump is a convicted felon, serial rapist, and pedophile who pardoned 1500 domestic terrorists on his first day in office. Trumpers are not "tough on crime". They're disgusting scum that collectively would lose a battle of wits with a wombat.
Using my term, Wombat, I see. How original. Haha. What a clown.
Trump isn't a serial rapist or pedophile. Nor a felon. If you believe a single misdemeanor for an accounting error turned 34 felony counts by way of left wing political attack is an actually legit, you're more blind than a an autistic star-nosed mole.
Biden showered with his daughter. Is he a pedophile?
Because it seems bad to me. But like I said, I’m no lawyer.
“NEWS: During a hearing in federal court in VA, prosecutors confirmed that the operative indictment in the case against James Comey was never shown to or voted on by the entire grand jury before it was presented in open court.”
🚨 BREAKING: U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli CONFIRMS that Gavin Newsom broke the law by discriminately drawing "Latino districts"...
They are now trying to get the new map struck down in court. "California used RACE. They wanted to draw Latino districts - and they said that. This isn't a theory. The legislature said that when passing the map! That they wanted a Latino district." "This one SHOULD get stricken down!" @USAttyEssayli STRIKE IT DOWN! And uphold Texas
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
