Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

No. We don't need to nominate another old white man. We've had enough of those.

Seems that there have been close to 100,000 cases of voter fraud in Texas alone in the last few years.

I thought you Dems said that voter fraud didn't exist? LOL

Motor Voter drives a Moskvitz, I think, or a Lada.

jesseriley wrote:

Motor Voter drives a Moskvitz, I think, or a Lada.

Not sure what car he drives but on his 1099 his employer is likely listed as the internet research agency or perhaps more truthfully the FSB or GRU.

Hi Ivan! How are things in your sh!thole Country?

She had a relationship with a married man. He had the extramarital affair, not her.

And he pretty much had an open marriage.

Obama was a fluke.

When younger people turn out to vote like older people.....when minorities turn out to vote like white people....when women turn out to vote like men....the we will have had enough of those evil old white men in office. Those are just cold hard facts.

Clinton will 100% run and 100% lose the primary.

Alan

Runningart2004 wrote:

L L wrote:

This shut down or wall talk with have no influence on an election that is more than a year and a half away.

Too many news cycles between now and then.

Just like DACA being stripped or even child separation was nearly forgotten by this past fall’s election.

Even the Kavanaugh headings just weeks before the election seemed to not be a voting issue.

If Trump is on the ballot November 2020 then his suppporters will be emboldened by him surviving the investigation.

Sure it will. There’s so much content for political ads and debate topics that it will be a field day for Democrats. It will be a reminder about what a continuing Trump presidency means. No president in our lifetime has had so many negative talking points.

Alan

I think you are living in a dream filled echo chamber. At this point, with the exception of Gabbard, the Dems being discussed are just more of the same unelectable garbage candidates. I'm stunned you would even consider 'crazy' Joe as viable.

Remember how certain the Dems were that Clinton was a lock? Most Dems are still suffering self imposed cognitive dissonance over the Clinton failure.

I would love nothing more than to see the Democratic party dump the sleaze of Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer, Harris, Biden, Feinstein and run a real difference maker. But if letsrun is any indicator they're not ready to move on from the failures of 2016. Understand that I'm no Trump fan or apologist. But given the choice of Trump or any of the above (Gabbard aside), Trump has at least as good a chance in 2020 as he did against the "holy grail" of Clinton in 2016.

Aside from Clinton herself, bucking the status quo is largely why got Trump elected. On that note the Dems are fools for not learning from their own mistakes. Identity politics and anti-national policy, coupled with hypocritical pro banking and pro corporate agendas will never serve a Dem candidate well.

“Evil old white men.” Ah, I can sure come up with a list of evil people and many were neither old or white. How about encouraging candidates that are willling to address the real problems confronting the country rather than manufactured controversies, like the Wall or Russia Collusion?

Trumpettes are NOT Americans!

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

“Evil old white men.” Ah, I can sure come up with a list of evil people and many were neither old or white. How about encouraging candidates that are willling to address the real problems confronting the country rather than manufactured controversies, like the Wall or Russia Collusion?

Old white men are victims!!!! It’s sooooo hard being a white dude in ‘Murcia!

Motor Votor wrote:

Seems that there have been close to 100,000 cases of voter fraud in Texas alone in the last few years.

I thought you Dems said that voter fraud didn't exist? LOL

"Just wondering if you bothered to educate yourself on this. The methodology used to determine the 95,000 "non-citizens" registered and 58,000 "non-citizen" voters is a bit suspect.

Cliff Notes version:

They checked voter records against driver's license records. If someone used non-citizen documents to apply for a driver's license they are being tagged as non-citizens in voter registration records. The problem, of course, is that individuals who are Texas residents but not US citizens at the time of their application for a driver's license can and do change their citizenship status. Further, there is no requirement and no reason at all to notify the department of motor vehicles about said change. Therefore, there are LOTS of US citizens who used non-citizen documents to apply for their driver's license.

To provide some idea about the magnitude of the problem with this "study", about 50,000 Texas residents become naturalized citizens each year. Over the period of the study (1996 - 2016?) that would be about 1,000,000 Texas residents who have become naturalized US citizens. With this, it is actually surprising that they found only 95,000 discrepancies between driver's license records and voter citizenship status.

In terms of verified instances of non-citizens registering to vote the numbers are slightly different than the 95,000. 97 people in total were prosecuted for voter fraud (of all kinds) during the 13 year period ending in 2017. That is an average of 7 - 8 cases per year. It is not clear how many of those 7 per year were related to non-citizenship status but it seems likely that it is somewhat less than 95,000. ;-)"

White Genocide! wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

“Evil old white men.” Ah, I can sure come up with a list of evil people and many were neither old or white. How about encouraging candidates that are willling to address the real problems confronting the country rather than manufactured controversies, like the Wall or Russia Collusion?

Old white men are victims!!!! It’s sooooo hard being a white dude in ‘Murcia!

"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin (or their age ;-) but by the content of their character." - Mostly MLK

White Genocide! wrote:

[quote]Ghost of Igloi wrote:

“Evil old white men.” Ah, I can sure come up with a list of evil people and many were neither old or white. How about encouraging candidates that are willling to address the real problems confronting the country rather than manufactured controversies, like the Wall or Russia Collusion?

Old white men are victims!!!! It’s sooooo hard being a white dude in ‘Murcia![/quote

Last thing I would ever want is to consider myself a victim. Most who do are victimized by a poor self-image.

Oh wait, I almost forgot . . . - LOL

:-)

Runningart2004 wrote:

No No No wrote:

No. We don't need to nominate another old white man. We've had enough of those.

Obama was a fluke.

When younger people turn out to vote like older people.....when minorities turn out to vote like white people....when women turn out to vote like men....the we will have had enough of those evil old white men in office. Those are just cold hard facts.

Clinton will 100% run and 100% lose the primary.

Alan

I don’t see that at all, how did you come the conclusion she will run? Nothing is absolute but I can’t imagine she would have any significant party support to run, but I do agree if somehow she did run she would certainly lose.

Ruh-Roh shaggy!!!!

https://www.wsj.com/articles/lawmakers-to-debate-border-immigration-as-next-shutdown-threat-looms-11548614760?mod=e2tw

Totally 4-D chess....totally.....

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mulvaney-vows-trump-will-build-border-wall-with-or-without-congress

The Fokus wrote:

Dont think any of the names entered so far are locks to beat Trump. Biden probably stands the best chance.

The undeclared Bloomberg would probably win the general election but won't get the Democrat nomination.

I'm genuinely surprised that more people aren't taking Gillibrand into consideration. I think she could stand as good a chance of winning as any of the Dems who are frequently mentioned--and better than most.

[Beto? No chance at Prez, but he might possibly make a useful VP candidate for somebody.]

Negotiation and enacting meaningful legislation is all about NO COMPROMISES EVER.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-doubts-hed-accept-any-deal-congress-strikes-for-border-wall