Finally...Unequivocal Proof That the Apollo Moon Landings Were Staged on Earth

I thought registering a user name with LRC is the only to prevent someone from using it? Better send an email to the co-founders.

Good to have you back. Anything new in this area?

What do you think of NASA scrapping the planned moon mission with astronauts that was scheduled for 2020? The thing I don't understand is that if we routinely went to moon on several missions 50 yrs ago with the primitive technology of that era, why don't we go back with the superior technology we have now. Computers would perform the entire mission and the astronauts would just sit back and enjoy the ride - kinda like a pleasure cruise to the moon. I would also think it would be a lot cheaper to send a manned mission to the moon with the better & more efficient technology of today vs what they had back in the 60s. ?

How is this thread still going and threads about epo's effect on running are getting canned?

Any unequivocal proof that the Apollo Moon landings actually happened, yet? A recent HD satellite picture of the landing site would be marvelous.

The moon has had plenty of satellite orbiters mapping out the lunar surface from only 30 miles altitude.

Citizens of the World would reasonably expect quite a few proud propaganda pictures of star-spangled banners to illustrate the dominance of US ingenuity and victory in the "Space Race".

There's something fishy going on here.

Next year will be the 50th anniversary of the supposedly famous Apollo 11 moon landing. If it was so easy to go to the moon back & back in the late 60s/early 70s (only one flaw with A13) you'd think Trump would want a 50th anniversary commemorative landing in his legacy. Imagine Trump all decked out at Cape Canaveral sending off the astronauts on this historic mission. The mission itself should be a piece of cake; 21st century computer technology compared to the primitive 60s.

But no mission is planned for next year, or that fact anytime soon. Why? Can we presently only send unmanned spacecraft to the moon? Is it only possible to send humans into low Earth orbit? What's going on here?

No lunar mission planned for next year's 50th anniversary.

Very suspicious.

https://www.inverse.com/article/34818-nasa-astronauts-moon-2020-scrapped

I think you're onto something here....why would NASA have no plans to do something that you just came up with in your head? That sounds unusual.

Space tourism will never happen. people like ‪Elon Musk‬ and ‪Richard Branson‬ are charlatans using people's emotional connection to space to scam them, all the while collecting taxpayer money. No "regular people" will ever go to space. Let's take a walk down memory lane:

2007: after 12 months of testing, ‪Richard Branson‬ might be ready to take people into space as soon as 2009. dont worry, ticket sales are going great.

2008: Branson's space voyage is just 18 months away. Tickets are only $200,000 dollars, and 250 people have tickets, so thats about 50 million dollars. but hey, you only get one chance to be the first people in space!

2010: Virgin Galactic has built the spaceship and we are officially just...18 months away, lol!!!!

2011: and... Branson is not in space. He does however, have a $200+ million dollar facility paid for by taxpayers... but hey, who knows more about space than this guy?

500 tickets sold so far. Just 15 months away from first launch!

2013: and flights are starting in 2014. By 2015, some kids will be going into space.

2014: flights are starting this year, for sure!

http://money.cnn.com/2014/05/29/news/companies/virgin-space/index.html

2015: Virgin Galactic gets... back on track to space tourism? Uh okay. no worries here.

https://phys.org/news/2015-02-virgin-galactic-track-space-tourism.html

2017: flights to begin in 2018, for sure. Buy your tickets!

https://www.space.com/36654-virgin-galactic-fly-space-tourists-2018.html

I can keep going but will stop here for now. Space tourism is science fiction and not reality. It's never gonna to happen, but hey, get a ticket though. Ask yourself does it make sense that we went to the Moon half a century ago, but billionaires with 2018 technology are struggling to get humans into low earth orbit? Wake up!

Waiting Patient wrote:

Any unequivocal proof that the Apollo Moon landings actually happened, yet? A recent HD satellite picture of the landing site would be marvelous.

The moon has had plenty of satellite orbiters mapping out the lunar surface from only 30 miles altitude.

Citizens of the World would reasonably expect quite a few proud propaganda pictures of star-spangled banners to illustrate the dominance of US ingenuity and victory in the "Space Race".

There are plenty of high-def pictures of the moon and of the landing sites. 30 miles up is quite high and the landers are not that big, so don't expect something dramatic, but the pictures are there.

DontFeedTheTroll wrote:

Waiting Patient wrote:

Any unequivocal proof that the Apollo Moon landings actually happened, yet? A recent HD satellite picture of the landing site would be marvelous.

The moon has had plenty of satellite orbiters mapping out the lunar surface from only 30 miles altitude.

Citizens of the World would reasonably expect quite a few proud propaganda pictures of star-spangled banners to illustrate the dominance of US ingenuity and victory in the "Space Race".

There are plenty of high-def pictures of the moon and of the landing sites. 30 miles up is quite high and the landers are not that big, so don't expect something dramatic, but the pictures are there.

Post them, please.

DontFeedTheTroll wrote:

Waiting Patient wrote:

Any unequivocal proof that the Apollo Moon landings actually happened, yet? A recent HD satellite picture of the landing site would be marvelous.

The moon has had plenty of satellite orbiters mapping out the lunar surface from only 30 miles altitude.

Citizens of the World would reasonably expect quite a few proud propaganda pictures of star-spangled banners to illustrate the dominance of US ingenuity and victory in the "Space Race".

There are plenty of high-def pictures of the moon and of the landing sites. 30 miles up is quite high and the landers are not that big, so don't expect something dramatic, but the pictures are there.

How do we know the landing sites weren't made from unmanned lunar probes? ?

Something is rotten in Denmark wrote:

There's something fishy going on here.

Next year will be the 50th anniversary of the supposedly famous Apollo 11 moon landing. If it was so easy to go to the moon back & back in the late 60s/early 70s (only one flaw with A13) you'd think Trump would want a 50th anniversary commemorative landing in his legacy. Imagine Trump all decked out at Cape Canaveral sending off the astronauts on this historic mission. The mission itself should be a piece of cake; 21st century computer technology compared to the primitive 60s.

But no mission is planned for next year, or that fact anytime soon. Why? Can we presently only send unmanned spacecraft to the moon? Is it only possible to send humans into low Earth orbit? What's going on here?

No lunar mission planned for next year's 50th anniversary.

Very suspicious.

But oil was like $2 per barrel back then.

Anyone who argued that the moon landings were faked should be castrated. At a minimum.

How many of you use things every day that require data and imagery that derived uniquely from satellites?

How do you think Garmin and Strava work? How do you think we get those nifty weather images? Really high-flying airplanes?

As I'm sure multiple people alone have pointed out, the sheer breadth of the cover-up would be logistically impossible. There is not a chance in hell that could have stayed a secret for 50 YEARS.

Some people just like to argue about crap for fun.

But if you believe for one second that humans have never set foot on the moon, you should avoid sharing semen, eggs, or ideas with other humans for the rest of your (hopefully brief) life. This is like a willful form of Down syndrome.

Just Waiting wrote:

Post them, please.

The Wikipedia page for the LRO has some, and NASA has more here:

The images are 1600x1200, using a push broom scanner (which I believe provides greater sensitivity than other configurations). Obviously this doesn't compare with the resolutions you can get in cameras today, but those sensors don't have to operate in temperatures near absolute zero, in a vacuum, liberally bathed in radiation and larger images take longer to transmit (which, if you are trying to scan the entire surface of the moon, makes a big difference). Trade-offs must be made.

Anyway, I know you won't accept that and are busy moving the goalposts as you read this, but I thought other people might find it interesting.

0/10

Has nothing to due with supposedly "manned" lunar missions.

Again, nothing to do with the issue tough guy. Putting humans in low-Earth orbit, i.e., the ISS, is one thing vs sending humans to the moon and back. We have humans regularly orbiting the Earth in the ISS. The Apollo missions could have easily just orbited the Earth with the astronauts for several days. People aren't going to notice the difference; you see the astronauts blast off from Cape Canaveral and several days later they splash down in the ocean. And everybody goes home happy. Going to moon & back is another story. The strongest suspicion is why haven't we gone back in 50 yrs? The technology we have in the 21st century compared to the 60s is like comparing the space shuttle with a World War I biplane.

Better read up on how the CIA can suppress information, control people, create disinformation.

And some people like to be internet JERKS for the fun of it (note that I used a benevolent form of a word that I really wanted to use).

There you go again; "Mr. Discussion Forum tough guy." ? But if YOU believe for one second that the government always tells the truth & never lies to us, you should avoid doing all the things that you just mentioned above. Btw, how's things at NASA? Lol.

Is asking for a clear high definition lunar-satellite color image of the landing site asking too much? Why is this such a problem?

Waiting Patient wrote:

Is asking for a clear high definition lunar-satellite color image of the landing site asking too much? Why is this such a problem?

Is accepting the vast array of documentation we already have asking too much? Why is this such a problem?

You know perfectly well that if we do at some point provide new high-def images of the landing site that you will immediately dismiss them and demand something even better. Your standard for "acceptable evidence" is a moving target of "better than everything we have now".

Pablo Novi wrote:

I haven't been back to look at this thread since the end of January. And what do I find?

A POST IN MY NAME THAT I DID N-O-T WRITE!

What can I do about this?

Not surprised that you can't figure out how that happened, given your "arguments" on a moon landing hoax and 9/11 hoax.

So there are no HD pictures of the moon's surface, as far as you are aware. Thanks for your input. Anyone else?

Ugh! Yeah, let's troll again and make the same stupid comments that that have been refuted already again and again in the previous 24 pages. Are gonna talk about the stars again too? Efing stupid trolls!

Four fellas who rob a bank can't keep their mouths shut. If your theory is true, this would be a conspiracy of thousands of individuals. Some one from the government would have written a book detailing so-called fake moon landing conspiracy. It happened. US personnel landed on the moon.