Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Fat hurts wrote:

drop in the bucket wrote:

Yes, companies spent $33 billion. Russian trolls spent $100k (0.0003% of that). That's why it didn't have any influence.

So you are so dumb you don't understand the concept of targeted advertising?

Also, they spent a LOT more than $100K. It was $1.25 million per month.

Also, the Trump campaign gave the Russians internal polling data to help with their targeted ads.

PROOF please.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

So you are so dumb you don't understand the concept of targeted advertising?

Also, they spent a LOT more than $100K. It was $1.25 million per month.

Also, the Trump campaign gave the Russians internal polling data to help with their targeted ads.

PROOF please.

There is this really neat thing called "Google". You can just put in stuff like "how much did russia spend on facebook ads". Then you can find out that the figures are right there in Mueller's indictment.

Fat hurts wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

PROOF please.

There is this really neat thing called "Google". You can just put in stuff like "how much did russia spend on facebook ads". Then you can find out that the figures are right there in Mueller's indictment.

No, this outrageous statement: “Also, the Trump campaign gave the Russians internal polling data to help with their targeted ads.”

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

No, this outrageous statement: “Also, the Trump campaign gave the Russians internal polling data to help with their targeted ads.”

No, the idiotic statement: "Trump says he would have won the popular vote nationwide if not for the millions of illegal votes that were cast for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. His spokesman Sean Spicer identified California as one of the “bigger states” that merit a federal probe into election fraud, adding, “That’s where I think we’re gonna look.”

stealing votes wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

No, this outrageous statement: “Also, the Trump campaign gave the Russians internal polling data to help with their targeted ads.”

No, the idiotic statement: "Trump says he would have won the popular vote nationwide if not for the millions of illegal votes that were cast for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. His spokesman Sean Spicer identified California as one of the “bigger states” that merit a federal probe into election fraud, adding, “That’s where I think we’re gonna look.”

That is not a reasonable response to Igy's request for proof as to the validity of the "outrageous statement".

Your post is the equivalent of the constant "But Hillary" posts we get from Rigged.

If you disagree with Trump and the Trumpettes then try to operate at a higher level than they do.

PIO! wrote:

stealing votes wrote:

No, the idiotic statement: "Trump says he would have won the popular vote nationwide if not for the millions of illegal votes that were cast for his opponent, Hillary Clinton. His spokesman Sean Spicer identified California as one of the “bigger states” that merit a federal probe into election fraud, adding, “That’s where I think we’re gonna look.”

That is not a reasonable response to Igy's request for proof as to the validity of the "outrageous statement".

Your post is the equivalent of the constant "But Hillary" posts we get from Rigged.

If you disagree with Trump and the Trumpettes then try to operate at a higher level than they do.

HI, HARDLOPER!!!!

You are almost the most ignorant poster on LRC. Jamin stands at the top of the heap.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

There is this really neat thing called "Google". You can just put in stuff like "how much did russia spend on facebook ads". Then you can find out that the figures are right there in Mueller's indictment.

No, this outrageous statement: “Also, the Trump campaign gave the Russians internal polling data to help with their targeted ads.”

Also included in court documents. Learn to use Google.

Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/12/trump-speaks-after-nato-summit-stable-genius-newday-vpx.cnn

I'm doing well, sir. And yourself? But how is our president doing?

The Trump Presidency will go down as the biggest political scandal in the history of the United States. I look forward to when we are through all this and can call it history.

Corruption and foreign influence affecting our sovereignty. It is treasonous. He was selling out our country for his own personal gain.

Everyday there is more evidence showing what he did, what his campaign did, what he knew, what he directed others to do. His denials about dealings with Russia during the campaign and during his Presidency have been proven to be lies. Everyone knew he was lying and now there is proof of the lies.

Four full weeks of the DONALD TRUMP SHUTDOWN . . . hang in there, everybody!

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/its-week-4-of-the-shutdown-americans-still-think-trump-is-to-blame/

oopsieeeeeee wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/politics/buzzfeed-trump-cohen-lie-congress-moscow/index.html

And Mueller reportedly has corroboration from emails, texts, recorded phone calls, etc.

That’s as much a smoking gun as you can get.

I know Mueller wants to tie a bow on this by questioning Trump directly but that’s going to be a year long battle over a subpoena. If there’s enough evidence to indict even though DOJ won’t do the deed then there’s enough evidence for impeachment.

This shutdown gets progressively worse after February as food stamps and sec 8 housing subsidies run dry.

Alan

oopsieeeeeee wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/politics/buzzfeed-trump-cohen-lie-congress-moscow/index.html

So if there is enough corroborating evidence, that's a slam dunk case for subornation of perjury.

It's definitely an impeachable offense, but we still need to see how many senate Republicans would be willing to go along.

And he's not going to get much help from his new AG:

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/01/18/lindsey-graham-william-barr-obstruction-of-justice-ctn-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

johnny99 wrote:

And he's not going to get much help from his new AG:

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/01/18/lindsey-graham-william-barr-obstruction-of-justice-ctn-vpx.cnn/video/playlists/this-week-in-politics/

By the way, when the Trump movie gets made, Bill Barr has to be played by John Goodman.

Fat hurts wrote:

oopsieeeeeee wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/politics/buzzfeed-trump-cohen-lie-congress-moscow/index.html

So if there is enough corroborating evidence, that's a slam dunk case for subornation of perjury.

It's definitely an impeachable offense, but we still need to see how many senate Republicans would be willing to go along.

I think if you ask them in private they do not want this shutdown to continue over a stupid wall. Shutdowns are all initially political theatre with no real impacts until about week 2 or 3 when ppl start missing paychecks. It gets very catastrophic when funding for government programs like food stamps and sec 8 runs dry.

42 million people use food stamps.

4.8 million households rely on sec 8.

Also I don’t think Republicans care how many laws he broke. They care if he gets caught and if the evidence is clear.

Alan

Alan

So if Mueller does have emails showing trump ordered Cohen to lie, does that turn 20 GOP senators?

If this story is true, then we would have campaign finance felonies, suborned purjury felonies and and obstruction felonies. Plus a solid ton of other things.

Is THAT enough for GOP senators to grow a spine? Multiple felonies?

Ben Sasse, Mitt Romney, Susan Collins, Rubio? You guys Americans or Republicans?

We know the Red Hats aren't responsible Americans, but you guys? You want to step up here and do your jobs?

oopsieeeeeee wrote:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/politics/buzzfeed-trump-cohen-lie-congress-moscow/index.html

This giant story about the President taking impeachable action and directing a subordinate to lie to Congress in order to cover up a business deal he had going in Moscow has now been out there for over 12 hours. (And there is surely more forthcoming, based on the evidence noted in the reporting.) Let's check in on the State Propaganda Mills to see how they are handling the news.

Breitbart's home page doesn't say one word about it. The Daily Caller's home page doesn't say one word about it. Is it on the Federalist's home page? Nope! The Blaze's home page? Nada! It is a marginalized side story on Infowars. It is the third story on Drudge after a story about migrants tunneling under a border fence and a headliner that reads "DELUSION NOT COLLUSION." It is a secondary story on the Fox News home page and the headline is "Rudy Rips Report Trump Told Cohen to Lie," which is false (Rudy didn't "rip" anything, he just misrepresented what was in the report by implying that it was based on the word of Michael Cohen rather than a trove of corroborating evidence and Trump Org correspondence) and deliberately vague.

Dear conservatives: you're being kept in the dark on purpose.

NOTHINGBERDER!