And Trumpers, DON’T forget the standing invitation to explain why Trump is still the R choice (and de facto party leader) when any of the other choices would get you/them 9_% of his AWESOME policy positions?
This is how a political party with morals and a backbone acts. The NJ governor and others are calling for menendez to step down.
compare and contrast to the approving Republican response to felon and insurrectionist trump. A president who chose to break his oath of office by calling to suspend the Constitution, instead of defending it. Trump has overwhelming support from the Republican Party.
“9 hours from "senior Democratic senator was indicted" to "the state's Democratic governor and Democratic heads of both houses of the state legislature call for him to step down."”
He won't step down unless he's forced to do it. He will fight this in court just like he did 8 years ago.
Just as I predicted!
🚨 JUST IN: Democrat Senator Bob Menendez, says he will NOT resign after being indicted on corruption and bribery charges.
And Trumpers, DON’T forget the standing invitation to explain why Trump is still the R choice (and de facto party leader) when any of the other choices would get you/them 9_% of his AWESOME policy positions?
Still waiting.
Trump derangement syndrome patients and lunatic Biden Administration supporters deserve nothing. A waste of time.
And Trumpers, DON’T forget the standing invitation to explain why Trump is still the R choice (and de facto party leader) when any of the other choices would get you/them 9_% of his AWESOME policy positions?
Still waiting.
"Hold not thy hand on thine ass, while waiting; for lo, it shall grow fast."
And Trumpers, DON’T forget the standing invitation to explain why Trump is still the R choice (and de facto party leader) when any of the other choices would get you/them 9_% of his AWESOME policy positions?
Still waiting.
without trump you don't get that fun zip in your shorts when your nominee for president calls for the death penalty for the former chair of the joint chiefs! Without that kind of thing...politics just aren't as much fun. I mean Pence defends the Constitution even if it hurts Republicans! Who needs that? Snore!
(yes, trump called for the death penalty for milley)
This post was edited 15 minutes after it was posted.
And Trumpers, DON’T forget the standing invitation to explain why Trump is still the R choice (and de facto party leader) when any of the other choices would get you/them 9_% of his AWESOME policy positions?
The Biden regime just set up a gun violence prevention office. Democrats want to confiscate all guns.
Ironically, Kamala held a press conference about “gun control successes” earlier this year…it was in Chicago, and over 10 were shot on the day she spoke.
And Trumpers, DON’T forget the standing invitation to explain why Trump is still the R choice (and de facto party leader) when any of the other choices would get you/them 9_% of his AWESOME policy positions?
Still waiting.
He has great policies. He hates the same people I hate. I love the way he destroys his competition in their interactions. His ability to come up with insulting nicknames is really entertaining and demeaning to the woke folk. I admire strongman politicians who understand the importance of traditional values and the importance of gun ownership rights (don't care about the abortion issue). I admire him because he understands that our cities are bastions of violence, corruption and immorality. Nothing will change with the Democrats in charge. Things will go downhill and downhill. I love our country and watching it slowly turn into a third world sewer under liberal control informs my decision.
The Biden regime just set up a gun violence prevention office. Democrats want to confiscate all guns.
Ironically, Kamala held a press conference about “gun control successes” earlier this year…it was in Chicago, and over 10 were shot on the day she spoke.
What's this? How can Democrats want to confiscate all guns? I'm pretty sure that Obama confiscated all guns over a decade ago.
And Trumpers, DON’T forget the standing invitation to explain why Trump is still the R choice (and de facto party leader) when any of the other choices would get you/them 9_% of his AWESOME policy positions?
Still waiting.
He has great policies. He hates the same people I hate. I love the way he destroys his competition in their interactions. His ability to come up with insulting nicknames is really entertaining and demeaning to the woke folk. I admire strongman politicians who understand the importance of traditional values and the importance of gun ownership rights (don't care about the abortion issue). I admire him because he understands that our cities are bastions of violence, corruption and immorality. Nothing will change with the Democrats in charge. Things will go downhill and downhill. I love our country and watching it slowly turn into a third world sewer under liberal control informs my decision.
He has great policies. He hates the same people I hate. I love the way he destroys his competition in their interactions. His ability to come up with insulting nicknames is really entertaining and demeaning to the woke folk. I admire strongman politicians who understand the importance of traditional values and the importance of gun ownership rights (don't care about the abortion issue). I admire him because he understands that our cities are bastions of violence, corruption and immorality. Nothing will change with the Democrats in charge. Things will go downhill and downhill. I love our country and watching it slowly turn into a third world sewer under liberal control informs my decision.
Parody?
prolly, yeah. No one could be dumb enough not to understand crime in US cities is down 80% over the last 30 years and that American cities are the engines of wealth that let rurals live well. It's parody, but pretty sharp. The best satire is when you aren't quite sure sometimes.
The Biden regime just set up a gun violence prevention office. Democrats want to confiscate all guns.
Ironically, Kamala held a press conference about “gun control successes” earlier this year…it was in Chicago, and over 10 were shot on the day she spoke.
I admire your ability to put two contradictory narratives in the same post, apparently with a straight face.
But, in fact, "Democrats want to confiscate all guns" does not automatically follow from "The Biden regime just set up a gun violence prevention office."
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted.
Gun Confiscation by the Government is often followed by Genocide, Those People In Weimer in the 1930's Found that out the Hard Way, Hopefully Americans are not as stupid as the people in Weimer who happily turned their guns in leading to an Atrocity that cost 6 Million Lives, they paid heavily for their stupidity oh well
Gun Confiscation by the Government is often followed by Genocide, Those People In Weimer in the 1930's Found that out the Hard Way, Hopefully Americans are not as stupid as the people in Weimer who happily turned their guns in leading to an Atrocity that cost 6 Million Lives, they paid heavily for their stupidity oh well
Only six million people were killed by the Nazis (who were post Weimar by the way)?
On the whole, gun laws were actually made less stringent for most non-Jewish German citizens during Nazi rule.[9][6] While Jews were subject to having their guns seized, the gun registry was so incomplete that many Jews retained their guns.[7
Gun Confiscation by the Government is often followed by Genocide, Those People In Weimer in the 1930's Found that out the Hard Way, Hopefully Americans are not as stupid as the people in Weimer who happily turned their guns in leading to an Atrocity that cost 6 Million Lives, they paid heavily for their stupidity oh well
1) *Weimar--and, strictly speaking, the Weimar Republic.
2) "often"--please provide three examples. Australia's partial confiscation of firearms is a counterexample.
3) Say the words "gun registration" to many pro-gun Americans and you are likely to hear that one of the first things that Hitler did when he seized power was to impose strict gun registration requirements that enabled him to identify gun owners and then to confiscate all guns, effectively disarming his opponents and paving the way for the Holocaust. ... Following Germany's defeat in World War I, the Weimar Republic passed very strict gun control laws in an attempt both to stabilize the country and to comply with the Versailles Treaty of 1919 – laws that in fact REQUIRED the surrender of all guns to the government. These laws remained in effect until 1928, when the German parliament relaxed gun restrictions and put into effect a strict firearm-licensing scheme. . . .
If you read the 1938 Nazi gun laws closely and compare them to earlier 1928 Weimar gun legislation – as a straightforward exercise of statutory interpretation – . . . with regard to possession and carrying of firearms, the Nazi regime relaxed the gun laws that were in place in Germany at the time the Nazis seized power. [All emphases mine.]
Say the words "gun registration" to many pro-gun Americans and you are likely to hear that one of the first things that Hitler did when he seized power was to impose strict gun registration requirements that enabled him to id...
1) *Weimar--and, strictly speaking, the Weimar Republic.
2) "often"--please provide three examples. Australia's partial confiscation of firearms is a counterexample.
3) Say the words "gun registration" to many pro-gun Americans and you are likely to hear that one of the first things that Hitler did when he seized power was to impose strict gun registration requirements that enabled him to identify gun owners and then to confiscate all guns, effectively disarming his opponents and paving the way for the Holocaust. ... Following Germany's defeat in World War I, the Weimar Republic passed very strict gun control laws in an attempt both to stabilize the country and to comply with the Versailles Treaty of 1919 – laws that in fact REQUIRED the surrender of all guns to the government. These laws remained in effect until 1928, when the German parliament relaxed gun restrictions and put into effect a strict firearm-licensing scheme. . . .
If you read the 1938 Nazi gun laws closely and compare them to earlier 1928 Weimar gun legislation – as a straightforward exercise of statutory interpretation – . . . with regard to possession and carrying of firearms, the Nazi regime relaxed the gun laws that were in place in Germany at the time the Nazis seized power. [All emphases mine.]
I'm curious why you cut off the quote right before this:
Third, approximately eight months after enacting the 1938 Nazi gun laws, Hitler imposed regulations prohibiting Jewish persons from possessing any dangerous weapons, including firearms.
Why didn't you include that? Don't you think that was important context? Very intellectually dishonest to leave that out.