Then we’ll make a deal with a “news” channel to broadcast propaganda 24/7. I’m not worried!
Then we’ll make a deal with a “news” channel to broadcast propaganda 24/7. I’m not worried!
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Little of what Flagpole raves about has happened so far.
Yeah, that's why it's called a "prediction". This is really odd for you Trumpers who look at a prediction and then comment about how none of it has happened so far. How could it have? The prediction is based on the investigations being over and reports made public.
Kind of like if a sports reporter predicts that the Cowboys will win the Super Bowl before the season even starts and people immediately say that nothing has happened so far.
Ridiculous!
BUT, many of the things I HAVE predicted HAVE come true. I said Cohen would be indicted and found guilty (he pleaded guilty) and that he would flip on Trump. I said Manafort would be indicted and found guilty. I said early on when Flynn was indicted that more would come...and that has been proven true.
More is to come.
Don Jr., Kushner, and Manafort will be charged with Conspiracy. Don Jr. will likely be charged with other financial crimes related to the Trump Organization, as will Ivanka and probably even Eric.
The Orange One will be charged with conspiracy (perhaps not at the same time that the others are), all kinds of financial fraud, obstruction of justice, emoluments clause violation, and officially the FELONY campaign finance law violation that he has already been fingered for by Cohen.
He will either be impeached and convicted by the Senate or he will resign UNLESS there is a criminality attached to that OR aliens from space come down here and make it not so.
I am closer every day to predicting that Trump will spend time in prison, but I am not there yet.
For you to learn:
pre·dic·tion
/prəˈdikSH(ə)n/Submit
noun
a thing predicted; a forecast.
"a prediction that the Greeks would destroy the Persian empire"
synonyms: forecast, prophecy, divination, prognosis, prognostication, augury; More
the action of predicting something.
"the prediction of future behavior"
We’ll have the Secret Service confiscate press passes. If that doesn’t work we just won’t hold any press conferences.
agip wrote:
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jun/02/ann-coulter/no-us-has-not-taken-14-mexicos-population/asian r reallly hot wrote:
I challenge you to find one thing she has said about immigration that isn't correct?
ugh..
Gee, that was tough, no?
How about Coulter's:
" Evidently, this refers to exactly two researchers, whose work is cited over and over again for the proposition that immigrants are less criminal than native Americans: Alex Piquero, criminology professor at the University of Texas at Dallas, and Bianca Bersani, sociology professor at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. "
What a bizarre claim. As agip says, "google is your friend". It is not difficult to look up study after study after study that in no way rely on Piquero or Bersani that say the same thing. Here you go:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1745-9125.12175. Of course, I don't want to insult the dude with an asian fixation's intelligence. I know he could go find a hundred more with very little effort. Google is . . .
So Coulter has found two researchers whose methods she questions and simply declared that these are the only two researchers out there who support the notion that immigrants (even undocumented immigrants) are less violent than native born Americans. And "asian dude" points to Coulter as a source of information as opposed to propaganda? Bizarre.
We’ll hold massive campaign rallies of the faithful, in their Trump-logo uniforms, even though there’s technically no campaign!
Pookie Washington wrote:
Fair and balanced wrote:
The Trump campaign organization was very small. You know damn well Trump knew about. Whether they can prove he knew is another question but you are a fool if you believe he didn't know.
My guess is the small fraction of Trump voters that have half a brain know that he colluded with the Russians to alter the outcome of the 2016 election, they are just betting or hoping it can't be proven. The other 99% of inbreds that voted for this blatant racist are too dumb to understand. They will believe anything that Trump says. Sad
I agree with your supposition, but I would say as many as 33% of Trumpers know he colluded with Russia and are just hoping it can't be proven. The other 67% of them are too dumb to understand any of it. All of them at this point are racist though, and all of them are window lickers...it's just that 33% of them at least think that perhaps they shouldn't be licking the windows (but they do so anyway).
We’ll stiff 800,000 government workers of their paychecks & assure the world that they support this policy! Funny guy.
agip wrote:
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jun/02/ann-coulter/no-us-has-not-taken-14-mexicos-population/
Thank you for finding one thing, even if that one thing you found is actually correct. That article is really bad. At one point it says ""It is well established that illegal aliens do respond to government surveys such as the decennial census and the Current Population Survey." Now if you believe that, that is crazy caca. My family doesn't respond to those things, much less illegals who barely speak English. Plus, how do you find an illegal who doesn't exist, wow. Of course some respond, and Ann states that, she just says they ALL dont respond, not even close.
A fact check was done on Ann, please see the link below. He have her overall 87% correct, which I am sure Ann could shed some light on the last 13%. Regardless, you should look at it instead of reading this crappy article. Even in this fact check, he says this article is crappy.
This is what he said about your incorrect fact, which is actually correct. Ann's numbers, according to him, and her, are a Hell of a lot more correct than the Fing 11 million people like to say.
The big picture is we don't know all the numbers. Coulter's numbers make more sense than numbers she's challenging. That's good. And she doesn't overestate her case by claiming perfection with her stats.
I'd say Coulter did a good job here. She presented the reader with useful information and put it in context in reasonable way. She challenged some claims that deserved challenging and gave some alternatives to consider that are more reasonable. They're imperfect, but the main point is people should stop accepting the 11 million figure and reconsider. Coulter's right about that.
Score: 95%.
http://curi.us/1820-adios-america-fact-checkHe facts checks lot of other things, so please read. I believe it shows Ann did a pretty good job and articles like you showed are freaking horsecrap.
But of course, call me a troll for your misinformation.
Well, here is the point you should be trying to make wrote:
Well, here is the point you should be trying to make wrote:
Here is the point you should be trying to establish:
Illegals commit more violent crimes upon citizens than citizens commit upon illegals.
If the above statement is true then you have the beginning of a case. If the above statement is false then you do not.
It appears that you are unable to establish (most likely not even able to understand) this fundamental point. Without this your entire argument about the horror of violent crimes committed by people "who should not even be here" falls apart.
So, got anything?
Your inability to comprehend is noted.
asian r reallly hot wrote:
The quality portion of the above post has been extracted for clarity.
No government until I get $5 billion. I’m not worried!
asian r reallly hot wrote:
agip wrote:
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jun/02/ann-coulter/no-us-has-not-taken-14-mexicos-population/Thank you for finding one thing, even if that one thing you found is actually correct. That article is really bad. At one point it says ""It is well established that illegal aliens do respond to government surveys such as the decennial census and the Current Population Survey." Now if you believe that, that is crazy caca. My family doesn't respond to those things, much less illegals who barely speak English. Plus, how do you find an illegal who doesn't exist, wow. Of course some respond, and Ann states that, she just says they ALL dont respond, not even close.
A fact check was done on Ann, please see the link below. He have her overall 87% correct, which I am sure Ann could shed some light on the last 13%. Regardless, you should look at it instead of reading this crappy article. Even in this fact check, he says this article is crappy.
This is what he said about your incorrect fact, which is actually correct. Ann's numbers, according to him, and her, are a Hell of a lot more correct than the Fing 11 million people like to say.
The big picture is we don't know all the numbers. Coulter's numbers make more sense than numbers she's challenging. That's good. And she doesn't overestate her case by claiming perfection with her stats.
I'd say Coulter did a good job here. She presented the reader with useful information and put it in context in reasonable way. She challenged some claims that deserved challenging and gave some alternatives to consider that are more reasonable. They're imperfect, but the main point is people should stop accepting the 11 million figure and reconsider. Coulter's right about that.
Score: 95%.
http://curi.us/1820-adios-america-fact-checkHe facts checks lot of other things, so please read. I believe it shows Ann did a pretty good job and articles like you showed are freaking horsecrap.
But of course, call me a troll for your misinformation.
you cite some dude with a website. JFC again. And even your cherry picked website confirms coulter is a freaking liar and cannot be trusted with facts. I can't even. What are you even thinking right now?
(and I could post up many more coulter lies about immigration - I picked the first one I found. You are a fool to believe anything she says)
tell us again why you think a wall will work?
TRUMP SCREAMS: The wall is a "Midevil" solution that works!
"They say it's a midevil solution, a wall. It's true, because it worked then and it works even better now," Trump bellowed.
agip wrote:
you cite some dude with a website. JFC again. And even your cherry picked website confirms coulter is a freaking liar and cannot be trusted with facts. I can't even. What are you even thinking right now?
(and I could post up many more coulter lies about immigration - I picked the first one I found. You are a fool to believe anything she says)
Again, the guy agrees with and actually explains clearly that your article was crap and that Ann actually made sense, and you say she is a liar?
Sure, give me more articles that tell me that illegals answer all of the government documents. THAT is JFC. How you read that and think that was worth posting is beyond me.
You DO understand how they come up with the 11 million right? Ann explains it and the guy explains it. And they both explain why the 11 million is wrong and your fing article is horsecrap.
Please tell me how they get to the 11 million. You can tell me please JFC.
azian b lil hot wrote:
tell us again why you think a wall will work?
Dude you are wrong, they are realllly hot!
Well, here is the point you should be trying to make wrote:
It appears that you are unable to establish (most likely not even able to understand) this fundamental point. Without this your entire argument about the horror of violent crimes committed by people "who should not even be here" falls apart.
So, got anything?
Your inability to comprehend is noted.[/quote]
Yes, that was the point, what is your deal. Glad you understood that. I posted government stats showing that point. Thank you for playing.
A “medieval solution” isn’t anything like what that guy in Germany proposed, of course. And feudalism has so many positive associations! Why are we wasting time with modern concepts like Constitutionalism?
Trump walking out of the meeting with Nancy Pelosi! No way this doesn't go past First Missed Paycheck Day.
TSA and air traffic controllers calling out sick too. I bet he declares a national emergency, just wait
jesseriley wrote:
A “medieval solution” isn’t anything like what that guy in Germany proposed, of course. And feudalism has so many positive associations! Why are we wasting time with modern concepts like Constitutionalism?
A medieval wall solution is over the top.
http://historywallcharts.eu/resources/uploads/thumbs/_DSF0873-Edit__924x0__.jpg