-
21
-
Producer prices surge again. The sharpest increase in 14 months.
Yes, he did.
33 -
Sleepy Joe is not fit for office.
This post was edited 3 minutes after it was posted.24 -
formerly present wrote:
joedlrts wrote:
You got me. I should have said 7 million drug addicts. My state basically changed from red to blue when drug addicts invaded.
Right, because drug addicts are well known for their consistent voting.
Riiiiiiight.
They vote when there is drug legislation on the ballot, which is why Dems try to make sure there are drug laws on the ballot in swing states any time there is a federal election. Addicts back the Dems.
33 -
00
-
joedlrts wrote:
formerly present wrote:
Right, because drug addicts are well known for their consistent voting.
Riiiiiiight.
They vote when there is drug legislation on the ballot, which is why Dems try to make sure there are drug laws on the ballot in swing states any time there is a federal election. Addicts back the Dems.
Liberals like to fry on high octane LSD. Purple microdot blotterized. Shades of Owsley. Shades of Loathing. This despite the Biblical edict to live beyond reproach in all aspects of life as promulgated and required by J. Christ in 2 Corinth 4:2 (QOP Ver. 3).
10 -
Who's shocked? They just want more welfare and don't want to work. Democrats are perfect for them.
10 -
agip wrote:
GOP Crime Blotter
Yes, this guy is a Republican in NYC. It's a party of let's say...low moral standards. Except Mitt Romney.
NEW YORK -- A former New York City Department of Buildings commissioner and some of his associates were arraigned Wednesday on charges of bribery and conspiracy.
Eric Ulrich is charged in five separate indictments. Prosecutors allege Ulrich used his position and accepted bribes in exchange for favors and access.Ulrich, 38, and his co-defendants were led into the courtroom in handcuffs. All pleaded not guilty to charges that include bribery and conspiracy.
Prosecutors say since at least 2021, Ulrich accepted more than $150,000 worth of bribes from his six co-defendants, including cash to fund his gambling at public and also illegal gambling joints like the 89th Street Café in Ozone Park, Queens.
You’d like him, he is a vocal opponent of Donald Trump.
21 -
joedlrts wrote:
formerly present wrote:
Right, because drug addicts are well known for their consistent voting.
Riiiiiiight.
They vote when there is drug legislation on the ballot, which is why Dems try to make sure there are drug laws on the ballot in swing states any time there is a federal election. Addicts back the Dems.
For better worse, my view of the Trumpism idiocy skews MUCH more towards "hugely depressing" than "amusing."
But THIS is an exception. Speaking oh-so-confidently about the voting habits of addicts!!!
20 -
welfare in CA(nada) wrote:
Who's shocked? They just want more welfare and don't want to work. Democrats are perfect for them.
The biggest welfare states are red states.
32 -
Nnonequals wrote:
joedlrts wrote:
They vote when there is drug legislation on the ballot, which is why Dems try to make sure there are drug laws on the ballot in swing states any time there is a federal election. Addicts back the Dems.
For better worse, my view of the Trumpism idiocy skews MUCH more towards "hugely depressing" than "amusing."
But THIS is an exception. Speaking oh-so-confidently about the voting habits of addicts!!!
And BTW, does anyone know who the bulimics back ?
10 -
Timothy Foyle wrote:
Newname wrote:
Those in charge have been doing to conservative whites and anti was leftists what they did to Muslims for decades.
Ooooo . . . "Those in charge"! Tell me more!
What's your thought? Nobody is in charge? Tell me how that works
14 -
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
Who cares about the gun charge?
It's the corruption of Joe Biden that needs to be brough to trial
04 -
Stater of the obvious wrote:
welfare in CA(nada) wrote:
Who's shocked? They just want more welfare and don't want to work. Democrats are perfect for them.
The biggest welfare states are red states.
Yes.
The areas that grow our food and actually make things
13 -
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
I was just saying the other day that the gun charges against Hunter are just trolling by US Assistant Attorneys. They know all the OAN, FoxNews, etc. right wingers are going to be kicking themselves when they have to try to pretend like the gun charges are a big deal when the next segment on their show is probably a guy who is fighting to repeal bans on machine guns.
13 -
Newname wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
Who cares about the gun charge?
It's the corruption of Joe Biden that needs to be brough to trial
4 years of a Trump DOJ. No dice.
2 years of R congressional "investigations." No dice.
You MIGHT be complaining to the wrong crowd.
31 -
Here's a clue.
.04 -
Newname wrote:
Timothy Foyle wrote:
Ooooo . . . "Those in charge"! Tell me more!
What's your thought? Nobody is in charge? Tell me how that works
YOU are the one who apparently knows who's in charge.
Tell us! Tell us!
31 -
Precious Roy wrote:
Just Another Hobby Jogger wrote:
I was just saying the other day that the gun charges against Hunter are just trolling by US Assistant Attorneys. They know all the OAN, FoxNews, etc. right wingers are going to be kicking themselves when they have to try to pretend like the gun charges are a big deal when the next segment on their show is probably a guy who is fighting to repeal bans on machine guns.
On the one hand, sure. We can giggle.
On the other hand, of course, when you're shameless (and shamelessly dishonest), NOTHING is a problem.
My memory fades, but it may remind me of 1984 and/or Animal Farm.
00
