NO conflict of interest with DA Willis concerning Wade. But judge says there is an 'appearance of impropriety' and so Wade must step down. Ha. Meanwhile Ashleigh Merchant is appearing before a GA state senate committee and talking about the case, which is TRULY improper (not just 'APPEARANCE' of impropriety). Will Merchant be asked to step down?
The judge tried to please the left with his horrific decision and he's going to lose his election anyway.
What a spineless unethical way to end your career as a judge...
What does Fani banging Wade have to do with the corrupt, twice impeached, one term, sexual predator ex president trying to illegally overturn the Ga election results?
The judge tried to please the left with his horrific decision and he's going to lose his election anyway.
What a spineless unethical way to end your career as a judge...
What does Fani banging Wade have to do with the corrupt, twice impeached, one term, sexual predator ex president trying to illegally overturn the Ga election results?
She's been proven to be more corrupt than the person she's prosecuting and she perjured herself on the stand multiple times and violated numerous ethical standards.
She should be disbarred for her behavior no matter who the target of her prosecution is.
There is an odor of mendacity permeating all your posts. You are disqualified from further use of this thread.
Willis lied on the stand repeatedly. This is a fact and it is disqualifying.
The judge made a political decision to stay in office and his career is over anyway because he's being challenged in his upcoming election by a brown guy to his left in a deeply liberal and racist county.
The Judge observed a two day evidentiary hearing including a cross examination of Willis and I don't believe he found any evidence that she lied. The most the Judge said was "Yet reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety." What are you claiming Willis lied about that the Judge somehow missed?
I see NOTHING political in the Judge's decision. He wasn't even required to hold the evidentiary hearing, but he did. His ruling on disqualification was fully supported by Georgia law and he cited many cases. He came down quite harshly on Willis (called her unprofessional) and was even harsher on Wade, who he booted off the case. There is NOTHING political in this decision at all. You're projecting and inventing stuff about a judicial opinion that you have never read.
What does Fani banging Wade have to do with the corrupt, twice impeached, one term, sexual predator ex president trying to illegally overturn the Ga election results?
She's been proven to be more corrupt than the person she's prosecuting and she perjured herself on the stand multiple times and violated numerous ethical standards.
She should be disbarred for her behavior no matter who the target of her prosecution is.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂This is what I mean by “you can’t make this stuff up”. You say she “violated numerous ethical standards”……are you kidding me? Do I really have to point out the LONG list of violations of ethical standards your grab em by the pu$$y candidate has committed? Sheesh 🤦🏽♂️ Your guy is a walking and talking violation of ethical standards!!!!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂This is what I mean by “you can’t make this stuff up”. You say she “violated numerous ethical standards”……are you kidding me? Do I really have to point out the LONG list of violations of ethical standards your grab em by the pu$y candidate has committed? Sheesh 🤦🏽♂️ Your guy is a walking and talking violation of ethical standards!!!!
It’s funny isn’t it?
Honest people can look at all these cases and see the way that the courts are bending over backwards to give Trump special treatment that no other defendant would have.
Trump is allowed to slander and attack court officials, judges witnesses and prosecutors. Any other defendant would be thrown in jail.
Trump had been allowed to delay repeatedly while any other defendant would have had their counsel sanctioned for wasting court time with BS.
Trump is charged with espionage yet is in court arguing that he and his codefendants should be able to see these classified documents at will at Mar A Lago. not only that but they want the public to see them.
Trump is arguing witnesses and jurors should be known so they can be the targets of M@ga threats.
In all these cases the Judges are being extremely cautious to cover their tracks. all to accommodate the most corrupt, vile, cheating fraudulent leader in our history.
And his cult is taking up his claim of Unfair! Unfair!
What does Fani banging Wade have to do with the corrupt, twice impeached, one term, sexual predator ex president trying to illegally overturn the Ga election results?
She's been proven to be more corrupt than the person she's prosecuting
Really?
More corrupt that an adjudicated sexual abuser, fraudster (Trump University, Trump Corp., etc), who can no longer run a charity in New York, that constantly stiffed his contractors and spent his life in court (typically losing), that attempted a coup and is currently facing 88 charges across four cases?
Willis lied on the stand repeatedly. This is a fact and it is disqualifying.
The judge made a political decision to stay in office and his career is over anyway because he's being challenged in his upcoming election by a brown guy to his left in a deeply liberal and racist county.
The Judge observed a two day evidentiary hearing including a cross examination of Willis and I don't believe he found any evidence that she lied. The most the Judge said was "Yet reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety." What are you claiming Willis lied about that the Judge somehow missed?
I see NOTHING political in the Judge's decision. He wasn't even required to hold the evidentiary hearing, but he did. His ruling on disqualification was fully supported by Georgia law and he cited many cases. He came down quite harshly on Willis (called her unprofessional) and was even harsher on Wade, who he booted off the case. There is NOTHING political in this decision at all. You're projecting and inventing stuff about a judicial opinion that you have never read.
Jesus Christ...
No one credible is denying she lied repeatedly.
She said the relationship started in 2022 despite multiple witnesses saying it started in 2020 at the latest.
She said she paid back the money Wade spent on her in cash despite there being absolutely zero record of any withdrawals or payments.
You clearly don't know anything about the case other than you like the decision.
Megyn Kelly is joined by Alan Dershowitz, author of "Get Trump," to discuss Judge Scott McAfee’s ruling in the Fani Willis disqualification case allowing Fan...
The Judge observed a two day evidentiary hearing including a cross examination of Willis and I don't believe he found any evidence that she lied. The most the Judge said was "Yet reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety." What are you claiming Willis lied about that the Judge somehow missed?
I see NOTHING political in the Judge's decision. He wasn't even required to hold the evidentiary hearing, but he did. His ruling on disqualification was fully supported by Georgia law and he cited many cases. He came down quite harshly on Willis (called her unprofessional) and was even harsher on Wade, who he booted off the case. There is NOTHING political in this decision at all. You're projecting and inventing stuff about a judicial opinion that you have never read.
Jesus Christ...
No one credible is denying she lied repeatedly.
She said the relationship started in 2022 despite multiple witnesses saying it started in 2020 at the latest.
She said she paid back the money Wade spent on her in cash despite there being absolutely zero record of any withdrawals or payments.
You clearly don't know anything about the case other than you like the decision.
You've mischaracterized the evidence. And you don't appear to know what a lie actually is (that's been obvious about you for years). And the Judge who saw and heard all the evidence live, is one credible person who did NOT find that she had lied.
You have never read the decision, you never will read the decision, and you don't know anything about the decision other than you know you don't like it because MAG@ told you not to like it.
You've mischaracterized the evidence. And you don't appear to know what a lie actually is (that's been obvious about you for years). And the Judge who saw and heard all the evidence live, is one credible person who did NOT find that she had lied.
You have never read the decision, you never will read the decision, and you don't know anything about the decision other than you know you don't like it because MAG@ told you not to like it.
You didn't read the decision you're lying about having read.
He said her testimony had the "odor of mendacity" which as politely as a judge can call a witness a liar.
You're literally doing what you're accusing me of doing.
Why are liberals so completely incapable of self awareness??
The Judge observed a two day evidentiary hearing including a cross examination of Willis and I don't believe he found any evidence that she lied. The most the Judge said was "Yet reasonable questions about whether the District Attorney and her hand-selected lead SADA testified untruthfully about the timing of their relationship further underpin the finding of an appearance of impropriety." What are you claiming Willis lied about that the Judge somehow missed?
I see NOTHING political in the Judge's decision. He wasn't even required to hold the evidentiary hearing, but he did. His ruling on disqualification was fully supported by Georgia law and he cited many cases. He came down quite harshly on Willis (called her unprofessional) and was even harsher on Wade, who he booted off the case. There is NOTHING political in this decision at all. You're projecting and inventing stuff about a judicial opinion that you have never read.
Jesus Christ...
No one credible is denying she lied repeatedly.
She said the relationship started in 2022 despite multiple witnesses saying it started in 2020 at the latest.
She said she paid back the money Wade spent on her in cash despite there being absolutely zero record of any withdrawals or payments.
You clearly don't know anything about the case other than you like the decision.
Since when does lying bother you? You carry water for Donald Trump of all people.
All politicians lie.
Biden lies every day dozens of times.
Prosecutors are held to a higher standard and are not allowed to lie under oath without being disbarred. She clearly lied repeatedly on the stand. So did Wade. This isn't debatable.
Since when does lying bother you? You carry water for Donald Trump of all people.
All politicians lie.
Biden lies every day dozens of times.
Prosecutors are held to a higher standard and are not allowed to lie under oath without being disbarred. She clearly lied repeatedly on the stand. So did Wade. This isn't debatable.
Yet, you only have a problem with her supposed lies? Sorta just makes you a partisan hack, with nothing to offer except the spoon fed talking points. But, we all know that already, don't we.
Since when does lying bother you? You carry water for Donald Trump of all people.
All politicians lie.
Biden lies every day dozens of times.
Prosecutors are held to a higher standard and are not allowed to lie under oath without being disbarred. She clearly lied repeatedly on the stand. So did Wade. This isn't debatable.
Lying under oath is a crime moron. Everyone is held to the same standard. There isn't a separate standard for prosecutors.
You've mischaracterized the evidence. And you don't appear to know what a lie actually is (that's been obvious about you for years). And the Judge who saw and heard all the evidence live, is one credible person who did NOT find that she had lied.
You have never read the decision, you never will read the decision, and you don't know anything about the decision other than you know you don't like it because MAG@ told you not to like it.
You didn't read the decision you're lying about having read.
He said her testimony had the "odor of mendacity" which as politely as a judge can call a witness a liar.
You're literally doing what you're accusing me of doing.
Why are liberals so completely incapable of self awareness??
I've read it twice. I even tossed the catchy term "odor of mendacity" at you a few hours ago, which is a clear indication that I'd read the opinion. YOU, on the other hand, have never read it, and you never will, yet you will keep posting about it completely uninformed. That's mental, dude. All mental.
If the Judge believed Willis was lying, he would have said so flat out and sanctioned her. "Odor of mendacity" is not a finding of lying (perjury). In fact, it was antecedent to this statement by the Judge: "neither side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence when the relationship evolved into a romantic one." The Judge also said, along those lines: "The Court is not under an obligation to ferret out every instance of potential dishonesty from each witness or defendant" and he was referring to Willis, Wade, AND the defendants' witnesses like Yeartie and Schlong.
Why are MAG@s so completely incapable of self awareness?
You didn't read the decision you're lying about having read.
He said her testimony had the "odor of mendacity" which as politely as a judge can call a witness a liar.
You're literally doing what you're accusing me of doing.
Why are liberals so completely incapable of self awareness??
I've read it twice. I even tossed the catchy term "odor of mendacity" at you a few hours ago, which is a clear indication that I'd read the opinion. YOU, on the other hand, have never read it, and you never will, yet you will keep posting about it completely uninformed. That's mental, dude. All mental.
If the Judge believed Willis was lying, he would have said so flat out and sanctioned her. "Odor of mendacity" is not a finding of lying (perjury). In fact, it was antecedent to this statement by the Judge: "neither side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence when the relationship evolved into a romantic one." The Judge also said, along those lines: "The Court is not under an obligation to ferret out every instance of potential dishonesty from each witness or defendant" and he was referring to Willis, Wade, AND the defendants' witnesses like Yeartie and Schlong.
Why are MAG@s so completely incapable of self awareness?
What do adolt and Rocky movies have in common? Two things:
1) The beginning/middle of the movie where Rocky is getting destroyed by the new, monstrous up-and-comer.
2) The end of the movie when Rocky finally destroys the new, monstrous up-and-comer.
Except in those movies, only one person is doing the destroying at a time. In adolt's case, it's multiple posters more-or-less at once (all of whom have superior brains, and most superior educations and real life experience).
I've read it twice. I even tossed the catchy term "odor of mendacity" at you a few hours ago, which is a clear indication that I'd read the opinion. YOU, on the other hand, have never read it, and you never will, yet you will keep posting about it completely uninformed. That's mental, dude. All mental.
If the Judge believed Willis was lying, he would have said so flat out and sanctioned her. "Odor of mendacity" is not a finding of lying (perjury). In fact, it was antecedent to this statement by the Judge: "neither side was able to conclusively establish by a preponderance of the evidence when the relationship evolved into a romantic one." The Judge also said, along those lines: "The Court is not under an obligation to ferret out every instance of potential dishonesty from each witness or defendant" and he was referring to Willis, Wade, AND the defendants' witnesses like Yeartie and Schlong.
Why are MAG@s so completely incapable of self awareness?
What do adolt and Rocky movies have in common? Two things:
1) The beginning/middle of the movie where Rocky is getting destroyed by the new, monstrous up-and-comer.
2) The end of the movie when Rocky finally destroys the new, monstrous up-and-comer.
Except in those movies, only one person is doing the destroying at a time. In adolt's case, it's multiple posters more-or-less at once (all of whom have superior brains, and most superior educations and real life experience).
But other than THAT, adolt, you're doing great. Keep up the good work. And if Trump could pat you on the back, he would.
Oh no, that's right, he wouldn't give you the time of day. And he'd very likely laugh at you. Never mind. Other thread, always waiting for his next load. That's you and so many others.
And none of that has ANY-THING to do with Biden. Or ANY-THING else. Just 100% pure, pure, pure idiotic tribalism.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.