Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

....,The sum of $10,000,000,000.

Sincerely,

Saudi Aramco, Inc.

Memo: purchase of the POTUS for the benefit of Suadi Arabia

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/22/politics/supreme-court-secret-court-case/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F

Fentrekker wrote:

Racket wrote:

As of now, we have no Secretary of Defense, no Chief of staff, no Attorney General no ones sure who's running the Justice Dept., the Stock Market is crashing and he's shutting the Government down. Oh and he's under federal investigation

Regardless of whether or not collusion with the Russians is ever proven, Trump is the most useful idiot in the history of Russian politics.

So what does that make those who voted for him?

Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2018/07/12/trump-speaks-after-nato-summit-stable-genius-newday-vpx.cnn

Make America Great Again wrote:

For years liberals wanted to prevent US troops from being deployed to foreign conflicts and to bring back the ones who are already deployed abroad. So why all of a sudden are they upset that President Trump is doing exactly what they wanted? Do they hate our President so much that they oppose anything he does, even if they used to support the exact same thing? That's really sad!

No. Liberals, along with conservatives have been warmongers in arms for generations. Take a look at campaign donations to both parties--there is little difference. The political center in the USA has generally been pro-war, pro-intervention, and that includes most of the elites of the Democratic and Republican parties. The libertarian faction of the Republican Party has been an exception to this, as has the progressive wing of the Democratic Party. Generally speaking, the will to dominate and support American business interests has been the motivating factor in US intervention, with a thin veneer of humanitarianism and defense against terrorism brushed on top--the sugar on the pill that gets voters behind them and gets young people to enlist. Old school liberals, neb-liberals, old school conservatives and neo-cons--they all supported going into Iraq in 2003, which will be looked upon in history as one of the greatest "own-goals" of history.

Trollminator wrote:

Fentrekker wrote:

Regardless of whether or not collusion with the Russians is ever proven, Trump is the most useful idiot in the history of Russian politics.

So what does that make those who voted for him?

I think you know the answer to that question.

Hillary did not want:

1) A WALL to span the entire southern border.

2) A WALL that Mexico would pay for.

3) A WALL made of concrete and rebar that Trump promised...now we are down to steel slats.

What Hillary did want though and what other Democrats DO want is reasonable border security which includes a variety of things including fencing, patrols and other technology, thus proving that they do NOT want "open borders".

"The WALL" was a stupid idea as was his call that Mexico would pay for it. We have an idiot President, and any person who still supports him is an idiot also. "Stupid is as stupid does." Well, stupid is supporting Trump. He is a criminal and serial liar.

Fence, wall whatever same thing. You can go under or over either if prepared.

A wall is not a grown up solution.

Alan

What goes hand in hand w/ this is revised immigration policy. Maybe something like what Canada has, with some Australia thrown in, etc.

But the GOP has had an extremely difficult time over the past 25 years agreeing on what immigration policy should be. There is strong pushback against amnesty or some sort of reset. I'd reckon a fair number of Dems feel the same way.

But the dialogue on immigration within the GOP has been extremely contentious since Gingrich and Buchanan held sway.

BREAKING!!!!

TRUMP AT 50%!!! :-)

In the news, Donald J "Art of the Deal" Trump has rest his 'boarder' wall demand to 2.5 billion. A 50% discount on a bigly good deal.

"The White House offer to Democrats on Saturday was $2.5 billion for border security, including new fencing."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/very-possible-shutdown-could-last-into-new-year-white-house-budget-director-mick-mulvaney-says/2018/12/23/2e6de67c-06bf-11e9-a3f0-71c95106d96a_story.html

Trump's goal is to put up anything he can refer to as a wall and put his name on.

50% wrote:

BREAKING!!!!

TRUMP AT 50%!!! :-)

In the news, Donald J "Art of the Deal" Trump has rest his 'boarder' wall demand to 2.5 billion. A 50% discount on a bigly good deal.

"The White House offer to Democrats on Saturday was $2.5 billion for border security, including new fencing."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/very-possible-shutdown-could-last-into-new-year-white-house-budget-director-mick-mulvaney-says/2018/12/23/2e6de67c-06bf-11e9-a3f0-71c95106d96a_story.html

There was also new "fencing" in last years deal as well. It was fencing based on designs already in use and approved...ie: not a WALL....but he will say it's a WALL.

It's all going to be about the wording. Schumer isn't going to allow anything that resembles a new wall so wording will be identical to last years. Dems will probably counter with 2.5B for border security without new fencing......even though last year's money was barely spent.

Trump just replaced Mattis instead of waiting till Feb. He's a child with the mental and emotional maturity of a 5 year old and I have never been so embarrassed for this country. If you can't see this I have no hope for you. If you are ok with this level of emotional and mental maturity then that's fine....just acknowledge it and own it.

We can all disagree on policy and corruption and who's a crook or not a crook but you at least should come to terms with this man child we have in the oval office. Accept it. Pray for your country.

Alan

Alan

TTH wrote:

Trump's goal is to put up anything he can refer to as a wall and put his name on.

Yes, and more specifically, his goal is to put up anything that will placate the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, and Coulter. If those three are happy, he's off the hook with his base.

And he needs his base more than ever if he wants any chance of not going to prison.

But it won't work.

Tiny IS going to prison.

While you are rightfully embarrassed Rigged is proud. He won’t comment though. The others have at least buried their heads in the sand even if they won’t admit the embarrassment.

What we all have to keep in mind is that from day 1 Trump has only tried to be president to 46% of the country, and the continuous bet he makes is that they are all gullible morons. Anybody with half a brain always knew that (1) a wall is neither feasible nor effective and (2) Trump was never going to get it done due to (1) and because he plays marbles.

All these polarizing issues are sticking less and less and his stupidity is ever more exposed to those swing voters. He is probably now president to around 40% of the country. I understand that with those 40% his approval rating is awesome, but the chances of re-election keeps dwindling.

Fat hurts wrote:

TTH wrote:

Trump's goal is to put up anything he can refer to as a wall and put his name on.

Yes, and more specifically, his goal is to put up anything that will placate the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, and Coulter. If those three are happy, he's off the hook with his base.

And he needs his base more than ever if he wants any chance of not going to prison.

But it won't work.

Tiny IS going to prison.

Yo might be right about that. I'm not ready to call that just yet (thought he deserves it of course), but I am getting closer all the time.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Yes, and more specifically, his goal is to put up anything that will placate the likes of Limbaugh, Hannity, and Coulter. If those three are happy, he's off the hook with his base.

And he needs his base more than ever if he wants any chance of not going to prison.

But it won't work.

Tiny IS going to prison.

Yo might be right about that. I'm not ready to call that just yet (thought he deserves it of course), but I am getting closer all the time.

It's "You", not Yo. Learn the difference.

Trump is not going to prison, you and Fat Hurts are absolutely delusional.

Runningart2004 wrote:

Nein Alan, Nein wrote:

That's absurd Alan. Fencing? No, people will EASILY get thru fencing.

Your Mitt Romney comments?? What in the Hell are you talking about?

People are ripping Trump for a wall when Hillary wanted the same thing (yes, it's the same damn thing).

Romney? Romney didn't run against Trump and lose 2 years ago, Hillary did.

I thought some of you to be a tad brighter, at least have normal common sense regardless of your political flavor. You've failed.

Do you know anything about how the Border Patrol works? I worked in San Diego for 8 years and worked ON the border in both Arizona and New Mexico for a combined 5. You people are clueless.

Fence, wall whatever same thing. You can go under or over either if prepared.

A wall is not a grown up solution.

Alan

Hillary Clinton wanted the same thing Alan. Would you have been ok with that? Of course, because she (leftist liar) isn't Trump. Bias runs amok, yes it's a real word.

Often you sound like the only adult on here.