Spokane word wrote:
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/dec/21/supreme-court-rejects-trump-plea-to-enforce-asylum/
Ruth Bader Ginsberg had cancer removed from her lung. At her age, she may not last that much longer. Trump could nominate a new Supreme Court candidate in 2019. A 6-3 majority is coming.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Spokane word wrote:
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/dec/21/supreme-court-rejects-trump-plea-to-enforce-asylum/Ruth Bader Ginsberg had cancer removed from her lung. At her age, she may not last that much longer. Trump could nominate a new Supreme Court candidate in 2019. A 6-3 majority is coming.
They’ve been writing her obit for a decade. She will serve until 90 then retire. Meanwhile Roberts is now a moderate so it’s more accurately a 4-4-1 court...
Alan
Bull Market wrote:
Racket wrote:
NASDAQ in a bear market now, thanks in part to Trump's trade war dip-sh!ttery; recession chances up bigly right now too.
Ha, I hope you lost your last $100 as you certainly can't have more than that ole' fella!
You hope I lost money? wtf kind of cretin are you. I swear to God this thread is like 90% people from the town in The Hills Have Eyes
Racket wrote:
Bull Market wrote:
Ha, I hope you lost your last $100 as you certainly can't have more than that ole' fella!
You hope I lost money? wtf kind of cretin are you. I swear to God this thread is like 90% people from the town in The Hills Have Eyes
I'm not the OP to whom you are responding to, but take a look at your responses, and it's not just you. Too many people are uncivil and you are just as guilty as many others.
I'm not left or right, I want a President for the People. Neither Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump were that, which is unfortunate. Based on what I've read, you get what you give.
Runningart2004 wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Ruth Bader Ginsberg had cancer removed from her lung. At her age, she may not last that much longer. Trump could nominate a new Supreme Court candidate in 2019. A 6-3 majority is coming.
They’ve been writing her obit for a decade. She will serve until 90 then retire. Meanwhile Roberts is now a moderate so it’s more accurately a 4-4-1 court...
Alan
January 1st Alan, January 1st. I thought you to be a tad smarter?
2019 is coming [hardloper] wrote:
January 1st Alan, January 1st. I thought you to be a tad smarter?
^ Epic Hardloper post of pure ignorance.
"Build that [strikethrough]wall[/strikethrough] steel slat barrier!"
Flagpole wrote:
"Build that [strikethrough]wall[/strikethrough] steel slat barrier!"
Here are some photos of the land Trump demands to build his pointless wall along.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Du6ygB_VAAA6jmq.jpghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/Du9Cq2rUUAEVu_x.jpghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/Du7KGrzVAAAfLpS.jpghttps://pbs.twimg.com/media/Du6ov41XgAA4CuX.jpghttps://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/12/21/i-had-no-idea-how-beautiful-border-is-beto-orourke-solicits-photos-habitats-risk-trumps-wall/hardloper is an idiot wrote:
2019 is coming [hardloper] wrote:
January 1st Alan, January 1st. I thought you to be a tad smarter?
^ Epic Flagpole post of pure ignorance.
Fixed it for ya libby boy!
Flagpole wrote:
"Build that [strikethrough]wall[/strikethrough] steel slat barrier!"
Yep, just like Hillary Clinton wanted. How soon we forget...or is it just simply left-wing bias?
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2018/jun/27/cal-thomas/did-hillary-clinton-support-border-wall-mexico/A barrier is a wall. What do you think she meant, legos? You are so biased and such a liar flagpole you should be embarrassed to be posting.
Racket. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
"Build that [strikethrough]wall[/strikethrough] steel slat barrier!"
Yep, just like Hillary Clinton wanted. How soon we forget...or is it just simply left-wing bias?
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2018/jun/27/cal-thomas/did-hillary-clinton-support-border-wall-mexico/A barrier is a wall. What do you think she meant, legos? You are so biased and such a liar flagpole you should be embarrassed to be posting.
[sigh]
Hillary supported fencing along 700 miles, not a "concrete wall" along the entire southern border.
Hillary also didn't say time and time again that Mexico would pay for it.
Hillary also never said a wall was being built when it wasn't being built.
Trump's "big beautiful wall" with those stupid prototypes has devolved into "steel slat barrier". You can also bet that whatever it ends up being will NOT go along the entire southern border and Mexico will not pay for it.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Spokane word wrote:
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/dec/21/supreme-court-rejects-trump-plea-to-enforce-asylum/Ruth Bader Ginsberg had cancer removed from her lung. At her age, she may not last that much longer. Trump could nominate a new Supreme Court candidate in 2019. A 6-3 majority is coming.
If RBG dies in 2020, Mitch will recant his "no election year confirmation" pledge and another conservative will sit on the court.
Democrats will then take control of the senate and the presidency.
In 2021, Democrats will expand the court and we will have 7-6 majority.
Flagpole wrote:
Racket. wrote:
Yep, just like Hillary Clinton wanted. How soon we forget...or is it just simply left-wing bias?
https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2018/jun/27/cal-thomas/did-hillary-clinton-support-border-wall-mexico/A barrier is a wall. What do you think she meant, legos? You are so biased and such a liar flagpole you should be embarrassed to be posting.
[sigh]
Hillary supported fencing along 700 miles, not a "concrete wall" along the entire southern border.
Hillary also didn't say time and time again that Mexico would pay for it.
Hillary also never said a wall was being built when it wasn't being built.
Trump's "big beautiful wall" with those stupid prototypes has devolved into "steel slat barrier". You can also bet that whatever it ends up being will NOT go along the entire southern border and Mexico will not pay for it.
What a liar. I am shocked that you can be that ignorant as to think others will fall for and follow your deflection post.
Hillary supported a barrier and wanted to keep illegal aliens from Mexico from entering the United States of America.
Hillary made many claims as a Senator and lies while she ran for President...her own side admitted that stating "she'll say anything to get elected". You're cherry picking and deflecting, nothing new there.
Hillary wanted a barrier and voted for it. A barrier is a stopping point to keep people from entering a specific area. So you are claiming that a fence would have been better and is "different" from a wall, or is that not racist on Hillary's part, and yours as well since you supported her?
Who was going to pay for the barrier? Taxpayers?
Do you mean Trump lied to the American People about a Wall that Mexico was going to pay for? Wow, Hillary never did that during the election.
She changed and flipped and flopped on anything and everything that anyone asked. Again, her own side said that (your bias clearly won't allow you to understand let alone agree with any link that is provided---not to mention you'll make an excuse for her).
Your side had better candidates, ones that I would have had zero problem with them as President. But Hillary Clinton? Nope, she was and is a liar just like her husband Bill.
Trump will not be doing jail time, just like Hillary didn't for her part in corruptive activities.
Racket. wrote:
Trump will not be doing jail time, just like Hillary didn't for her part in corruptive activities.
Tiny is already an unindicted co-conspirator in two felonies.
There are 17 different active investigations into Trumpworld (that we know about).
Every major legal entity associated with the president is being investigated for possible crimes:
1. The Trump campaign
2. The Trump transition
3. The Trump inauguration
4. The Trump administration
5. The Trump Organization
6. The Trump Foundation
Tiny is going to prison.
Racket. wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
[sigh]
Hillary supported fencing along 700 miles, not a "concrete wall" along the entire southern border.
Hillary also didn't say time and time again that Mexico would pay for it.
Hillary also never said a wall was being built when it wasn't being built.
Trump's "big beautiful wall" with those stupid prototypes has devolved into "steel slat barrier". You can also bet that whatever it ends up being will NOT go along the entire southern border and Mexico will not pay for it.
What a liar. I am shocked that you can be that ignorant as to think others will fall for and follow your deflection post.
Hillary supported a barrier and wanted to keep illegal aliens from Mexico from entering the United States of America.
Hillary made many claims as a Senator and lies while she ran for President...her own side admitted that stating "she'll say anything to get elected". You're cherry picking and deflecting, nothing new there.
Hillary wanted a barrier and voted for it. A barrier is a stopping point to keep people from entering a specific area. So you are claiming that a fence would have been better and is "different" from a wall, or is that not racist on Hillary's part, and yours as well since you supported her?
Who was going to pay for the barrier? Taxpayers?
Do you mean Trump lied to the American People about a Wall that Mexico was going to pay for? Wow, Hillary never did that during the election.
She changed and flipped and flopped on anything and everything that anyone asked. Again, her own side said that (your bias clearly won't allow you to understand let alone agree with any link that is provided---not to mention you'll make an excuse for her).
Your side had better candidates, ones that I would have had zero problem with them as President. But Hillary Clinton? Nope, she was and is a liar just like her husband Bill.
Trump will not be doing jail time, just like Hillary didn't for her part in corruptive activities.
We should find out Mitt Romney’s position on the wall, his is just as relevant as Hillary’s. Who cares. The horse is dead, the bones are scattered.
Of course some sort of barrier along part of the border makes sense as part of a comprehensive plan, but just thinking a heeeeeuge wall along the entire border is going fix immigration is simple minded and childish.....ask Trumps new Chief of Staff he’ll tell you all about it.
Alan
What we should be discussing:
1.Improved fencing where it’s needed.
2.Increased H2 visa program. These people just wanna come here to work so put them to work....put them to work at the border doing maintenance and odd jobs at low (under min wage) wages until they are able to find better work.
3, Temporary sheltering for those families working at the border.
4.Increased capacity to process immigrants. Reduced time to process immigrants. Increase the number of border crossings and outposts.
5. Naturalization process for those already here.
Alan
Runningart2004 wrote:
Of course some sort of barrier along part of the border makes sense as part of a comprehensive plan, but just thinking a heeeeeuge wall along the entire border is going fix immigration is simple minded and childish.....ask Trumps new Chief of Staff he’ll tell you all about it.
Alan
Mulvaney will be replaced really, really fast.
As chief of staff he's in a much more high profile position. The recordings of him saying Tiny is a terrible human being and that the wall is childish should finish him off. I don't think Trumpers are going to just let that go. Most of them probably haven't heard those recordings yet, but they will soon.
If he's lucky, he will keep his OMB job, but Tiny needs to find a new warm body for chief of staff pronto.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
Make America Great Again wrote:
Racket wrote:
As of now, we have no Secretary of Defense, no Chief of staff, no Attorney General no ones sure who's running the Justice Dept., the Stock Market is crashing and he's shutting the Government down. Oh and he's under federal investigation
Mattis will not leave until the end of February. Kelly will be there until the end of year. Mulvaney will take over after that. Matt Whitaker is in charge of DOJ, and will be replaced by William Barr once he is confirmed. Stock market is in correction after the record breaking boom. And the Democrats are shutting down the government.
And there is still witch hunt going on, but it will soon be over thanks to Barr.
Well that was one idiot's take on things. LOL!
Yeah Trump is basically trying to blackmail Congress. Instead of actually seeing what the other side wants in return for a big heeeuge wall. Now The Wall isn’t even a wall anymore it’s a political punching bag. He had a deal on the table months ago that was The Wall for DACA and he rejected it. Now he’s out of time and there will be no wall ever again.
Alan
