Official thread to discuss moderation policies

Let's talk about the moderators

We don't know who the moderators are, their demographics, or how many of them exist. We also have no accountability for what they delete, what they post under anonymous usernames, and how they behave online and in real life outside of these boards.

At the very least, all moderators should only be allowed to post using their registered usernames with a subheading indicating they are a moderator. Furthermore, any thread they delete should have to be reported to Weldon and Robert. Finally, if we are not allowed to know the names of the moderators, we should know how many of them exist and what age/race/gender they are.

Sincerely,

We, the People

Michael Smores wrote:

Let's talk about the moderators

We don't know who the moderators are, their demographics, or how many of them exist. We also have no accountability for what they delete, what they post under anonymous usernames, and how they behave online and in real life outside of these boards.

At the very least, all moderators should only be allowed to post using their registered usernames with a subheading indicating they are a moderator. Furthermore, any thread they delete should have to be reported to Weldon and Robert. Finally, if we are not allowed to know the names of the moderators, we should know how many of them exist and what age/race/gender they are.

Sincerely,

We, the People

I've no issue with the moderation overall, and the BroJos are receptive to emails/comments privately, although I'm not sure why the Seidel House thread got deleted. People were behaving civilly in that one and there weren't many trolls, any more than normal.