🥈in obfuscation.
-
30
-
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Oooof wrote:
What a surprise. No refuting the results. I knew that would happen.
A drop off, but as proven, not a statistically significant drop off.
Your hypothesis doesn’t hold up.
I knew he would have a bull$hit, lackluster refutation too, trying to piggyback on someone else’s supposedly superior and more pristine results. “Paint annotations.” What a jacka$.
Btw, even if there was a statistically significant dropoff (there wasn’t), it was still minor and sure as hell doesn’t prove “Long Covid.” Essentially, Djokovic only played “poorly” in the January to May time frame before he got injured. Five months. Could be age, could be injury, could be illness, could be just a bad (for him) streak. Whatever the case, he still made a semifinal, final, and won a gold medal. Still world ranked #2. Not the stuff of true Long Covid.
I anticipate some massaging of data, reposting of different charts, shaded lines, more claims that it “looks” like a dip, “there’s a trend”, etc. But the verdict is already in. His hypothesis has been rejected.
30 -
Oooof wrote:
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
I knew he would have a bull$hit, lackluster refutation too, trying to piggyback on someone else’s supposedly superior and more pristine results. “Paint annotations.” What a jacka$.
Btw, even if there was a statistically significant dropoff (there wasn’t), it was still minor and sure as hell doesn’t prove “Long Covid.” Essentially, Djokovic only played “poorly” in the January to May time frame before he got injured. Five months. Could be age, could be injury, could be illness, could be just a bad (for him) streak. Whatever the case, he still made a semifinal, final, and won a gold medal. Still world ranked #2. Not the stuff of true Long Covid.
I anticipate some massaging of data, reposting of different charts, shaded lines, more claims that it “looks” like a dip, “there’s a trend”, etc. But the verdict is already in. His hypothesis has been rejected.
My work is done. I’ll ride into the sunset like the heroes in the old cowboy movies.
20 -
Oooof wrote:
My work is done. I’ll ride into the sunset like the heroes in the old cowboy movies.
Harambe's favorite cowboy movie is Brokeback Mountain.
20 -
Oooof wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Under 2600s more rigorous analysis it does. Clearly cleaner and better handled data. The trend holds in both your datasets which is important concordance. This is further vindication.
It doesn’t matter what you “think” or what your opinion is. The data clearly rejects your hypothesis. As I stated several times, just because there “looks” like a difference does not mean that there is a statistically significant difference. The analysis bears this out.
Your hypothesis has been rejected by the analysis of the data.
What data! You posted a few poorly communicative screenshots with annotations that showed the same trends as 2600 bros analysis. 2600 bros power is clearer and show significance. Both your datasets support my point.
Without a detailed comparison of methods we can’t know who’s analysis is better - of if any of them hold up.However, we do know 2600 bro used two sets of performance metrics that both showed concordance with the long COVID hypothesis. This is good support
Thank you for this exercise - it’s strengthened my position.
02 -
Oooof wrote:
Oooof wrote:
I anticipate some massaging of data, reposting of different charts, shaded lines, more claims that it “looks” like a dip, “there’s a trend”, etc. But the verdict is already in. His hypothesis has been rejected.
My work is done. I’ll ride into the sunset like the heroes in the old cowboy movies.
You’ve simply discarded 2600 bros multiple analysis because you didn’t like the results. Both of your data shows the same trend. This is very compelling in support of my genius diagnosis.
12 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Oooof wrote:
What a surprise. No refuting the results. I knew that would happen.
A drop off, but as proven, not a statistically significant drop off.
Your hypothesis doesn’t hold up.
I knew he would have a bull$hit, lackluster refutation too, trying to piggyback on someone else’s supposedly superior and more pristine results. “Paint annotations.” What a jacka$.
Btw, even if there was a statistically significant dropoff (there wasn’t), it was still minor and sure as hell doesn’t prove “Long Covid.” Essentially, Djokovic only played “poorly” in the January to May time frame before he got injured. Five months. Could be age, could be injury, could be illness, could be just a bad (for him) streak. Whatever the case, he still made a semifinal, final, and won a gold medal. Still world ranked #2. Not the stuff of true Long Covid.
If you’ve worked in a quantitative field you’ll know there are many immediate tells about the quality of someone’s analysis and their comfort with analytic methods.
Being unable to present your data in a clear manner is not disqualifying but does call into question someone’s experience.
Regardless, as I’ve said many times, both of these analyses show the same trend. This is great support for the long COVID diagnosis.Thank you for chiming in with some butthurt though. We were missing that.
03 -
As sub9 has frustratingly discovered, i will win every argument because I simply will never give it up. I outlast all antivaxxers.
03 -
Noah Lyles has had Covid the last couple days, but our resident "experts" completely missed that one.
10 -
Harambe wrote:
If you’ve worked in a quantitative field you’ll know there are many immediate tells about the quality of someone’s analysis and their comfort with analytic methods.
Being unable to present your data in a clear manner is not disqualifying but does call into question someone’s experience.
Regardless, as I’ve said many times, both of these analyses show the same trend. This is great support for the long COVID diagnosis.Thank you for chiming in with some butthurt though. We were missing that.
No you weren't, or do the callouses make it not hurt anymore?
40 -
Harambe wrote:
As sub9 has frustratingly discovered, i will win every argument because I simply will never give it up. I outlast all antivaxxers.
Lasting a long time while going bareback in a dude's ass is impressive.
40 -
he rides bareback wrote:
Noah Lyles has had Covid the last couple days, but our resident "experts" completely missed that one.
I believe he's vaccinated. Makes sense how he was still able to perform at a high level.
05 -
Harambe wrote:
As sub9 has frustratingly discovered, i will win every argument because I simply will never give it up. I outlast all antivaxxers.
Except you actually have yet to “win” an argument, especially this long Covid argument. Moreover, I doubt you compelled even one person to get vaxxed besides your neighbor MILFs who agreed to get their kids injected just so you would go the heck away. But, hey, you’ve still got your ego and pride, so there’s that. 🥇, champ.
Novak doesn’t now nor ever did have long Covid. Doesn’t have a positive test from the time period in question, subjectively poor play was January through May only, and he still made semifinal, final, and gold medal in the three most important tournaments of the year where he wasn’t battling injury. You have convinced no one.
30 -
he rides bareback wrote:
Noah Lyles has had Covid the last couple days, but our resident "experts" completely missed that one.
Perhaps his long vax cost him the gold. Too bad he didn’t take Novavax, which, amazingly, is still being held up for those who even want/need it.
20 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
Harambe wrote:
As sub9 has frustratingly discovered, i will win every argument because I simply will never give it up. I outlast all antivaxxers.
Except you actually have yet to “win” an argument, especially this long Covid argument. Moreover, I doubt you compelled even one person to get vaxxed besides your neighbor MILFs who agreed to get their kids injected just so you would go the heck away. But, hey, you’ve still got your ego and pride, so there’s that. 🥇, champ.
Novak doesn’t now nor ever did have long Covid. Doesn’t have a positive test from the time period in question, subjectively poor play was January through May only, and he still made semifinal, final, and gold medal in the three most important tournaments of the year where he wasn’t battling injury from long COVID. You have convinced no one.
Me: convinces MILFS to vax up
You: ranges online
Me: elegantly gets my opponents to prove Chokervic had long COVID for me
You: Doesn't like that one bit
03 -
Sub-9:00 guy wrote:
he rides bareback wrote:
Noah Lyles has had Covid the last couple days, but our resident "experts" completely missed that one.
Perhaps his long vax cost him the gold. Too bad he didn’t take Novavax, which, amazingly, is still being held up for those who even want/need it.
Similar data to mRNA vax in terms of breadth. Both good options!
03 -
wait your claiming that a person with active Covid didn't get the gold because of the vaccine?.
New levels of stupidity even for you.
Please consult your pretend medical expert daughter or better yet I'll consult her personally.
21 -
MILFS are, in fact, extremely receptive to Harambe's reasoning. What can I say?
02 -
Harambe wrote:
MILFS are, in fact, extremely receptive to Harambe's reasoning. What can I say?
Men I'd Like to F***?
21 -
he rides bareback wrote:
Harambe wrote:
If you’ve worked in a quantitative field you’ll know there are many immediate tells about the quality of someone’s analysis and their comfort with analytic methods.
Being unable to present your data in a clear manner is not disqualifying but does call into question someone’s experience.
Regardless, as I’ve said many times, both of these analyses show the same trend. This is great support for the long COVID diagnosis.Thank you for chiming in with some butthurt though. We were missing that.
No you weren't, or do the callouses make it not hurt anymore?
That was definitely an interesting choice of words. Not sure why that was on the brain.
20
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.