One of many if you would only do some research on your own.
I will no longer respond to you now that it is quite apparent you are a racist piece of sh!t with your "Tar Baby" reference toward me. I thought most in my adopted state had moved past this. Apparently, not all have. Have fun flying your Conferate Flag, you racist, bigoted piece of sh!t.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X17300811
The results of this research help to understand the roles that the various modes may play in a future transport system, encouraging future research on AVs and the study of possible implementations in a more efficient way.
In particular, this research shows that private cars still represent an attractive option in the era of autonomous vehicles, as out-of-pocket costs for the user (0.17 CHF/km, c.f. Fig. 3) are lower than for most other modes (and could be even lower if the user e.g. produced its own electricity). This is in the range of the $0.15/mile Burns et al. (2013) found for shared AVs and the $0.16/mile Johnson (2015) found for purpose-built pooled aTaxis, but they neglected important cost factors - for example cleaning. Compared to the assumption by Fagnant and Kockelman (2015) of a $1.00/mile price for a shared AVs, even the full cost of private vehicle ownership might be competitive.
In fact, buying an autonomous vehicle could be regarded as an investment in a private mobility robot, which can be used both for chauffeur services and for errands; this venture will therefore be even more attractive than a conventional vehicle. Hence, it can be expected that a substantial number of people would value the private use of a mobility robot and will agree to pay the associated premium. Additionally, traditional car manufacturers are strongly motivated to maintain the current emotional connection many people have to their cars. In conclusion, even as low costs for shared AVs, as estimated by Burns et al. (2013) and Johnson (2015), might not be low enough to end the reign of the private car.