Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Your misspellings, incorrect punctuation, and wrong words aside, your assumptions and thoughts are incorrect.

1) "President Trump just has to prove that he made the payments from himself personally and not through the campaign finance." BS. That is not how the campaign finance laws work. I suggest you educate yourself there so that you don't repeat this nonsense.

2) Stop with the Hillary stuff. She is not the President. Trump's crimes have nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. If you believe she is so guilty of something, go hire a lawyer and have at it.

3) By deciding to vote for Trump regardless of what the investigations turn up shows foolishness on your part. He is already accused of being a felon, and he WILL be indicted for that at some point UNLESS he resigns and not being indicted is part of the resignation agreement. We still also have outstanding questions about obstruction of justice (which he has done openly) and conspiracy. So, if he is found to have conspired with Russia to illegally win an election, you are OK with that? I guess you are a sheep then. Sad for you.

With regard to intelligence or education, we are as we present ourselves, especially when it is done more than once. One time is a mistake or a typo. More than once means you believe it is that way. That's how we know Trump believes it is "smocking". He spelled it that way twice.

Yes your Fat Gut does hurt wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Not long ago, somebody on Fox News was saying that they were bringing in smallpox, which of course was eradicated from the earth in 1980.

source? yep, another made up liberal bs statement.

Fox & Friends

“What about diseases?” Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade asked.

“We have these individuals coming in from all over the world that have some of the most extreme medical care in the world,” Ward said. “And they're coming in with diseases such as smallpox and leprosy and TB [tuberculosis] that are going to infect our people in the United States.”

Not again wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I'm not ready to pick someone to back just yet (and I might not until the General election, and even then I might do so half-heartedly. We just can't have Trump in there again./\

NO!!!!!!!

This is the attitude that got us Trump. People voted for him because they didn't want HRC. We shouldn't just put someone out there just to because we don't want Trump. We need a true leader.

I concur, NA.

In fact--if I may introduce some ancient history--the "anybody but" emotion was what sunk the Dems in 2004.

People were desperate to get GWB out of the White House. So when John Kerry--who, let's be charitable, was not exactly the strongest candidate available--showed some early success, all the Dems jumped on the Kerry bandwagon. They backed a guy who, at least as far as SATs are concerned, was even dumber than W.

What they did NOT do was have a thorough, THOUGHTFUL primary season to sort out the contenders and their positions. They just went with NotBush. And they lost.

If the Dems' only criterion for their 2020 candidate is NotTrump--if they make the election only *about* Trump--then the guy who *is* Trump will have the advantage and they are likely to lose again, for reasons similar to those in 2004. NA got it right: They need a genuine leader.

_________________________________________________________________________

On a separate note: I don't seem to see any mention of Gillibrand. Has she come out categorically against running?

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

President Trump just has to prove that he made the payments from himself personally and not through the campaign finance.

Wrong. The government just has to prove that Tiny knew he was making these payments to affect the election. That's what makes it a campaign contribution.

Faux Gnus wrote:

Yes your Fat Gut does hurt wrote:

source? yep, another made up liberal bs statement.

Fox & Friends

“What about diseases?” Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade asked.

“We have these individuals coming in from all over the world that have some of the most extreme medical care in the world,” Ward said. “And they're coming in with diseases such as smallpox and leprosy and TB [tuberculosis] that are going to infect our people in the United States.”

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-commentator-says-migrants-are-carrying-smallpox-a-disease-eradicated-in-1980

FAKE NEWS!

Okay a$$hole, I am writing on a Letsrun chat forum without correcting small grammatical errors. I am not writing a paper in college. If you have issues with the way I write, you can have at it with Towson University. You only correct grammatical errors when you are annoyed or triggered by what I write.

Also, you are damn right I will be voting President Trump and am proud to do so. The Justice Department and FBI are only out to get the President and Republicans. They change the laws for Democrats.

Fat hurts wrote:

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

President Trump just has to prove that he made the payments from himself personally and not through the campaign finance.

Wrong. The government just has to prove that Tiny knew he was making these payments to affect the election. That's what makes it a campaign contribution.

But he can make the payments to protect his family. Plus he has to report it after the election.

Yes your Fat Gut does hurt wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Not long ago, somebody on Fox News was saying that they were bringing in smallpox, which of course was eradicated from the earth in 1980.

source? yep, another made up liberal bs statement.

not too long ago, MSNBC and CNN said Hillary would win in a landslide. like you, they were wrong too.

I don't make stuff up. Google it.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

The Justice Department and FBI are only out to get the President and Republicans. They change the laws for Democrats.

You're not the first person I've encountered who's expressed those sentiments.

But how do you figure? DOJ and FBI are both part of the Executive Branch, which is headed by the President . . . who's had the backing of GOP majorities in both houses of Congress for the last 20+ months. Why not clean house?

Not really being argumentative here, but I seriously don't get it.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Wrong. The government just has to prove that Tiny knew he was making these payments to affect the election. That's what makes it a campaign contribution.

But he can make the payments to protect his family. Plus he has to report it after the election.

Nope. Two wrong sentence is a row.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Wrong. The government just has to prove that Tiny knew he was making these payments to affect the election. That's what makes it a campaign contribution.

But he can make the payments to protect his family. Plus he has to report it after the election.

But he did not report it after the election. There are strict rules about timeliness of reporting. Thus, it's a campaign finance violation.

The only way he is innocent is if he thought the payment was only to protect his family. That's not plausible and we have tapes and witnesses to back up the fact that Tiny knew it was to protect the campaign.

The payment might have had a dual purpose. Tiny might have had both his family and the campaign in mind when he did it. But the legal part doesn't get him off the hook for the illegal part.

Fat hurts wrote:

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

President Trump just has to prove that he made the payments from himself personally and not through the campaign finance.

Wrong. The government just has to prove that Tiny knew he was making these payments to affect the election. That's what makes it a campaign contribution.

Good freakin' grief! How can someone comment like Thisthreadisridiculous just did? I understand that not everyone knows how this works, but there's a name for those people -- "silent".

Thisthreadisridiculous -- there are people here other than just me who know how things work. Do your research before posting such nonsense or you will surely be called on it. As a tip, listening to most of Fox News isn't proper research.

Fat hurts wrote:

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

But he can make the payments to protect his family. Plus he has to report it after the election.

But he did not report it after the election. There are strict rules about timeliness of reporting. Thus, it's a campaign finance violation.

The only way he is innocent is if he thought the payment was only to protect his family. That's not plausible and we have tapes and witnesses to back up the fact that Tiny knew it was to protect the campaign.

The payment might have had a dual purpose. Tiny might have had both his family and the campaign in mind when he did it. But the legal part doesn't get him off the hook for the illegal part.

Shooting down the 'protect' Melania smoke screen is Melania herself.

Flagpole wrote:

As a tip, listening to most of Fox News isn't proper research.

she does not care wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

But he did not report it after the election. There are strict rules about timeliness of reporting. Thus, it's a campaign finance violation.

The only way he is innocent is if he thought the payment was only to protect his family. That's not plausible and we have tapes and witnesses to back up the fact that Tiny knew it was to protect the campaign.

The payment might have had a dual purpose. Tiny might have had both his family and the campaign in mind when he did it. But the legal part doesn't get him off the hook for the illegal part.

Shooting down the 'protect' Melania smoke screen is Melania herself.

https://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/donald-trump-cheating-affair-melania-trump-156937/

Melania not caring and Trump not caring about the repercussions for himself within his relationship with Melania are two entirely different things.

Flagpole wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Wrong. The government just has to prove that Tiny knew he was making these payments to affect the election. That's what makes it a campaign contribution.

Good freakin' grief! How can someone comment like Thisthreadisridiculous just did? I understand that not everyone knows how this works, but there's a name for those people -- "silent".

Thisthreadisridiculous -- there are people here other than just me who know how things work. Do your research before posting such nonsense or you will surely be called on it. As a tip, listening to most of Fox News isn't proper research.

*spends all day for the past 2 years arguing with idiots on this thread*

Also Flagpole :

Good freakin' grief! How can someone comment like Thisthreadisridiculous just did?

You are a fool to vote for someone who has already been implicated in two felonies, and an even bigger one to say now that no matter what he does that you will support him. I don't feel that way about my mother, and I love my mother. You have a very skewed value system steeped in tinfoil hat-type paranoia.

Find a mirror and have a deep discussion with yourself. Perhaps you can invite famous Towson University graduates to help you find your way -- Amy Schumer, Charles Dutton, and Brian Stelter. I would stay away from Kevin Clash though.