“A drumbeat is growing, and it’s a drumbeat...growing more and more until she does finally sit down for an interview...
And the longer they take to sit down, the more scared they look.”
Chicken-mala
🐔🐔🐔🐔🐔
They were all excited about her in 2019 for the 2020 primary too. An accomplished, articulate, attractive black woman would be unbeatable.
The huge difference between now and the Harris' primary run, is that people absolutely HATE Trump and are celebrating his pending loss in the election.
Do you now know why people are so excited and happy? Trump is going to lose.
Why don't you come clean here? Maybe just have a moment of brief honesty.
Do you really believe that Trump is concerned whatsoever about the constitutionality of Harris being the nominee? Has he ever concerned himself with the constitution?
Can you at least admit that Trump is totally butt hurt he misses his campaign against sleepy joe?
He means she did not receive a single vote from a single American to be the nominee so she does not have a single legitimate elector.
Electors are chosen in the election in November, which hasn't happened yet.
Party delegates are chosen in the primary. The Constitution has no mention of parties, primaries, or delegates.
The delegates choose the nominee which the electors then vote for...
Harris did not participate in the primary. How did she get delegates at all?
Article II describes the electors which are commonly known to follow the will of the delegates.
If we're pretending that the will of the people means nothing and the states can do whatever the hell they want with their own electors why are you upset about Trump's alternate electors???
I think a lot of you have missed the big statement saying they are retired.. this would exclude Rupp, Jager, Centro for the time being.
In my opinion it could possibly be Solinsky/Webb or someone like Hassan mead or something. But again, they weren’t a big name or contender or at least that’s what it seems to say
I think a lot of you have missed the big statement saying they are retired.. this would exclude Rupp, Jager, Centro for the time being. In my opinion it could possibly be Solinsky/Webb or someone like Hassan mead or something. But again, they weren’t a big name or contender or at least that’s what it seems to say
It's actually the Minneapolis city council and the mayor (Frey boy) who completely fvcked up the city with their woke nonsense, but I can see how politically that you would want to tag Walz. I do the same with Trump. I blame him for all the BLM riots in DC. He didn't do jack. That's what I tell impressionable people. Trump didn't do jack about the BLM riots. Except pose with a Bible. But that was a joke. Only a MAG@ could believe some guy using a Bible as a prop. That's how you guys end up with all the useless stuff in your hovels. You get suckered. I bet you still have a 10 pack of fake ear bandages. WTF are you going to do with those dude? Man, you got suckered bad. Hillbilly sucker.
They were all excited about her in 2019 for the 2020 primary too. An accomplished, articulate, attractive black woman would be unbeatable.
The huge difference between now and the Harris' primary run, is that people absolutely HATE Trump and are celebrating his pending loss in the election.
Do you now know why people are so excited and happy? Trump is going to lose.
Because you're stupid and addled with TDS you can't comprehend that half the country disagrees with you.
If your cult told you to love Trump you would wake up tomorrow loving Trump.
I along with tens of millions of other Americans oppose the Democrats because their policies are hot dogsh*t and Trump has nothing to do with it.
Where do you think these delegates come from and what do you think they do?
The parties have had multiple ways of nominating candidates, and candidates have been given the support of delegates in multiple ways. You’re aware of superdelegates?
You mention history. Were you upset with the way Lincoln appeared on the ballot?
Both R and D primaries occurred between 1916 and 1952 with relatively little influence on the selection of the party nominee.
If the candidate with the most delegates (determined by the voice of the voters in the primaries) were to die between the conclusion of the primaries and the party convention, how do you propose that a party should nominate a candidate?
Why don't you come clean here? Maybe just have a moment of brief honesty.
Do you really believe that Trump is concerned whatsoever about the constitutionality of Harris being the nominee? Has he ever concerned himself with the constitution?
Can you at least admit that Trump is totally butt hurt he misses his campaign against sleepy joe?
The only person here who uses the term "butt hurt" is Ginamator. I wonder who this new poster is. LOL.
It's actually the Minneapolis city council and the mayor (Frey boy) who completely fvcked up the city with their woke nonsense, but I can see how politically that you would want to tag Walz. I do the same with Trump. I blame him for all the BLM riots in DC. He didn't do jack. That's what I tell impressionable people. Trump didn't do jack about the BLM riots. Except pose with a Bible. But that was a joke. Only a MAG@ could believe some guy using a Bible as a prop. That's how you guys end up with all the useless stuff in your hovels. You get suckered. I bet you still have a 10 pack of fake ear bandages. WTF are you going to do with those dude? Man, you got suckered bad. Hillbilly sucker.
The difference is Walz supports and ideologically agrees with the leftist Minneapolis city council and Trump opposes BLM like all decent people do.
It's not the US president's job or place to control city and state problems.
The dumbest, most toothless hillbilly in the poorest holler in the country has more common sense than you do.
Electors are chosen in the election in November, which hasn't happened yet.
Party delegates are chosen in the primary. The Constitution has no mention of parties, primaries, or delegates.
The delegates choose the nominee which the electors then vote for...
Harris did not participate in the primary. How did she get delegates at all?
Article II describes the electors which are commonly known to follow the will of the delegates.
If we're pretending that the will of the people means nothing and the states can do whatever the hell they want with their own electors why are you upset about Trump's alternate electors???
You clearly misstated "electors" when you meant "delegates" on the previous page. I think you know the difference, but you are so stubborn that you can't admit a minor mistake.
You are also so determined to defend Trump's ramblings that you continue to weave responses that don't actually clarify or correct what he or you said .
The delegates choose the nominee which the electors then vote for...
Harris did not participate in the primary. How did she get delegates at all?
Article II describes the electors which are commonly known to follow the will of the delegates.
If we're pretending that the will of the people means nothing and the states can do whatever the hell they want with their own electors why are you upset about Trump's alternate electors???
That’s one contorted mishmash of logic worthy of the MyPillow guy.
Where do you think these delegates come from and what do you think they do?
The parties have had multiple ways of nominating candidates, and candidates have been given the support of delegates in multiple ways. You’re aware of superdelegates?
You mention history. Were you upset with the way Lincoln appeared on the ballot?
Both R and D primaries occurred between 1916 and 1952 with relatively little influence on the selection of the party nominee.
If the candidate with the most delegates (determined by the voice of the voters in the primaries) were to die between the conclusion of the primaries and the party convention, how do you propose that a party should nominate a candidate?
Yes super delegates are just another example of Democrat corruption. They were handy when the DNC wanted to railroad Sanders in the 2016 primary.
Biden didn't die he was forced out.
There's plenty of ways to nominate a candidate that are better than simply anointing a person no one in the country actually likes.
It's actually the Minneapolis city council and the mayor (Frey boy) who completely fvcked up the city with their woke nonsense, but I can see how politically that you would want to tag Walz. I do the same with Trump. I blame him for all the BLM riots in DC. He didn't do jack. That's what I tell impressionable people. Trump didn't do jack about the BLM riots. Except pose with a Bible. But that was a joke. Only a MAG@ could believe some guy using a Bible as a prop. That's how you guys end up with all the useless stuff in your hovels. You get suckered. I bet you still have a 10 pack of fake ear bandages. WTF are you going to do with those dude? Man, you got suckered bad. Hillbilly sucker.
The difference is Walz supports and ideologically agrees with the leftist Minneapolis city council and Trump opposes BLM like all decent people do.
It's not the US president's job or place to control city and state problems.
The dumbest, most toothless hillbilly in the poorest holler in the country has more common sense than you do.
Aren't you that guy who lies about Trump's trials? It is you! You're still here? WTF? Bud, no one, and I mean NO ONE, in this thread believes anything you post. Your credibility has been destroyed. You may as well post about fake helicopter rides from now on, because no one believes anything you say.
I think it was your Post # 3835 on page 192 that was your downfall. You stupidly posted a demonstrable falsehood and lie. You posted: "The jury was incorrectly instructed that Cohen being guilty of a crime meant Trump was guilty of the same crime."
That was a lie. You posted a lie. You came in here and deliberately lied and provided false information to the MAG@s. They don't trust you anymore. Nobody does. Every time you post, people remember you as the guy who lies all the time. You made your bed. Now you have to lie in it.
The parties have had multiple ways of nominating candidates, and candidates have been given the support of delegates in multiple ways. You’re aware of superdelegates?
You mention history. Were you upset with the way Lincoln appeared on the ballot?
Both R and D primaries occurred between 1916 and 1952 with relatively little influence on the selection of the party nominee.
If the candidate with the most delegates (determined by the voice of the voters in the primaries) were to die between the conclusion of the primaries and the party convention, how do you propose that a party should nominate a candidate?
Yes super delegates are just another example of Democrat corruption. They were handy when the DNC wanted to railroad Sanders in the 2016 primary.
Biden didn't die he was forced out.
There's plenty of ways to nominate a candidate that are better than simply anointing a person no one in the country actually likes.
Uh, I was already aware that you didn’t like Democrats and that you didn’t like this particular process.
Oh. You say there are “better” ways? Possibly. I can easily grant you that. But that’s not the question at hand.
You suggested that the process was unconstitutional and that it was undeniably corrupt when viewed through the lens of historical precedent.
I haven’t seen you come close to offering a satisfactory justification for those assertions.
It looks like our Trumpers have abandoned their expert Economist and stock market movement interpretation hats from 3 days ago in favor of their new constitutional, election scholar hats.
When Trump claims Kamala’s nomination was “unconstitutional” (like he did in that rambling, incoherent demonstration of his mental decline that he called a press conference) is that because he genuinely doesn’t understand what the word means or because he’s a lying sack of sh*t?
He means she did not receive a single vote from a single American to be the nominee so she does not have a single legitimate elector.
That doesn't answer the question. He claimed her nomination was "unconstitutional". Does he not understand what that word means? Or is he a lying piece of sh*t?
As did the pillow guy. And Fox. Both of which are paying millions and millions for their lies.
Would be nice if Winnie had to pay too.
Today, Republicans lost again:
A judge ordered Mike Lindell to pay the attorney fees of a man who won his "Prove Mike Wrong" contest. Lindell owes Robert Zeidman $4,508 in attorney fees, a Thursday court order says. A judge already ordered Lindell to pay Zeidman the $5 million prize money.