Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Trollminator wrote:

Top Trump funny of the week has got to be “more raking and cleaning to prevent forest fires”. I know he’s constantly appealing to lowest common denominator/IQ, but this was a legit airhead Trump statement. Just fvcking dumb.

Make America Rake Again!

Here I am just #raking around as all us #finns do to prevent forest fires.

— Iida Korhonen (@iidaKorhonen) November 18, 2018

Greetings from #Finland! Just finished raking leaves here.#RakeAmericaGreatAgain #RakeTheForest #Trump #SundayFunday #SundayMorning #rakenews #CaliforniaWildFires #ClimateChange #haravointi #metsänhoito #ilmastonmuutos #Suomi

— Kristiina Vahvaselkä (@TravelWithXtina) November 18, 2018

Young rakers. #Raking since 1970. #Finland

— Paula Kinnunen (@KinnunenPaula) November 18, 2018

Only in Finland!

— Outi Länsman (@outilansman) November 18, 2018

In Finland even small kids rake forests.#raking #finland #forestrake #rakefinlandgreatagain

— Anders Furu (@ATFuru) November 18, 2018

Just this afternoon I was busy meeting my raking quota. #RakeNews #Finland #Haravointi

— Tarja van Veldhoven (@tarjuccia) November 19, 2018

Just an ordinary day in the Finnish forest ~ Ihan normipäivä suomalaisessa metsässä #Trump #forest #firesafety #raking #forestry #Finland #Finnish #CaliforniaFire #RakingAmericaGreatAgain #rakingtheforest #Suomi #haravointi #metsäpalot #rakingleaves

— Pyry Luminen (@pyryluminen) November 18, 2018

Looser wrote:

Twitterazi wrote:

I love the guy on twitter.

"I'm going to sue you. I'm going to sue you. I'm going to sue you. I'm going to sue you...."

It's hilarious.

The guy truly has some issues. Deadbeat to the tune of $213K.

Flagpole, you should be ashamed for backing this deadbeat.

1) The law firm they mention in the story is no longer Avenatti's law firm.

2) Avenatti has had some issues with paying people money before this, but in this case, it isn't clear if he owes this money or someone else does. The law firm (that Avenatti is not a part of) was already moving out and not "evicted".

3) I have never "backed" Avenatti. I have only commented on positive things he has done, which are undeniable. I have no allegiance to him, don't want him to run for President, don't think he would make a great president (though better than Trump), and I never said I would like him to run for President.

4) People should be "ashamed" of backing someone only after bad stuff has become public and then they STILL back that person. No one should ever be ashamed of being fooled by someone initially, for we can't know everything about anyone. So, while there is an argument that anyone who voted for Trump should be ashamed, there are some legitimate arguments to be made for that initial vote, BUT after all we have learned since election day 2016, anyone who STILL supports Trump should be ashamed of themselves. With regard to Avenatti, the truth is still uncovered, but I never "backed" him to begin with.

Trollminator wrote:

Top Trump funny of the week has got to be “more raking and cleaning to prevent forest fires”. I know he’s constantly appealing to lowest common denominator/IQ, but this was a legit airhead Trump statement. Just fvcking dumb.

Particularly since the CA wildfires (mostly) don't qualify as forest fires at all.

rtur wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Top Trump funny of the week has got to be “more raking and cleaning to prevent forest fires”. I know he’s constantly appealing to lowest common denominator/IQ, but this was a legit airhead Trump statement. Just fvcking dumb.

Particularly since the CA wildfires (mostly) don't qualify as forest fires at all.

Hmmm, the largest fires started in forest areas.

Trump is losing it. He confuses a horse for his precious Ivanka. Grab 'em by the . . . .

https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1064584485272993792

If anyone is still defending Rasmussen's absurdly high approval ratings for Drumpf, consider how awfully they mucked up the midterms, and then decide to ignore Rasmussen.

(by the way, 538 nailed the midterms almost perfectly. The only thing they missed was Donnelly in Indiana)

"Rasmussen predicted that Republicans (!) would win the popular vote for the House by 1 point; Democrats currently lead by 8 points. Was a large sample (n=2,500) so you can't really call it an outlier. Mayyyyybe they should take a look under the hood?"

https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1064618476508246017

Looser wrote:

Twitterazi wrote:

I love the guy on twitter.

"I'm going to sue you. I'm going to sue you. I'm going to sue you. I'm going to sue you...."

It's hilarious.

The guy truly has some issues. Deadbeat to the tune of $213K.

Flagpole, you should be ashamed for backing this deadbeat.

Yeah. I don’t get the fascination some have with this guy. He seems like the Dem version of Trump.

Not sure what you see in him, Flagpole.

JBB wrote:

Looser wrote:

The guy truly has some issues. Deadbeat to the tune of $213K.

Flagpole, you should be ashamed for backing this deadbeat.

Yeah. I don’t get the fascination some have with this guy. He seems like the Dem version of Trump.

Not sure what you see in him, Flagpole.

Loudmouth guy with bad hair who likes porn stars and stiffs people on payment. Yep, sounds like Trump.

BREAKING! Oh, the tragedy!

Ivanka Trump used personal account for emails about government business

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/politics/ivanka-trump-personal-email-account/index.html

Lock her up!

L L wrote:

Lock her up!

No words for this... my guess is radio silence from trumpers or the usual whataboutism

Trollminator wrote:

L L wrote:

Lock her up!

No words for this... my guess is radio silence from trumpers or the usual whataboutism

Trumps be like...

“We’ll the libs didn’t have a problem when Hitlery did it, so what’s the big deal?”

Trumpers gonna Trump.

BUTT the eMails!!! wrote:

BREAKING! Oh, the tragedy!

Ivanka Trump used personal account for emails about government business

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/politics/ivanka-trump-personal-email-account/index.html

If it’s true then she needs to be disciplined, charged, etc. Please do not label this as “extremely careless.” This is why you have government emails.

JBB wrote:

Looser wrote:

The guy truly has some issues. Deadbeat to the tune of $213K.

Flagpole, you should be ashamed for backing this deadbeat.

Yeah. I don’t get the fascination some have with this guy. He seems like the Dem version of Trump.

Not sure what you see in him, Flagpole.

That's a triple-A question (well, technically not a question).

Asked And Answered

L L wrote:

Lock her up!

Turns out when Trump's mouth-breather crowds chant this, they meant Ivanka.

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

BUTT the eMails!!! wrote:

BREAKING! Oh, the tragedy!

Ivanka Trump used personal account for emails about government business

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/politics/ivanka-trump-personal-email-account/index.html

If it’s true then she needs to be disciplined, charged, etc. Please do not label this as “extremely careless.” This is why you have government emails.

You are...CORRECT! For the record, I am ok with some punishment coming Hillary's way for this and for Colin Power and The Orange One for using a private cell phone, and anyone else breaking these security rules. Justice is blind and should remain so...Democrat, Republican, doesn't matter. Rules matter. The law matters.

Good for you for getting this right.

Flagpole wrote:

Thisthreadisridiculous wrote:

If it’s true then she needs to be disciplined, charged, etc. Please do not label this as “extremely careless.” This is why you have government emails.

You are...CORRECT! For the record, I am ok with some punishment coming Hillary's way for this and for Colin Power and The Orange One for using a private cell phone, and anyone else breaking these security rules. Justice is blind and should remain so...Democrat, Republican, doesn't matter. Rules matter. The law matters.

Good for you for getting this right.

Severity of the emails matter too. Meaning does it put the country in danger or is it just simple policy emails that have no direct threat. Either way I expect better. She does deserve due process.

Ivanka's emails.

Also, in the same document (page 118) Sean Hannity gets cc:ed on some government emails. Why?

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4165150-Ivanka-Emails-From-Treasury.html#document/p35/a385986

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4165150-Ivanka-Emails-From-Treasury.html#document/p118/a385986

BUTT the eMails!!! wrote:

BREAKING! Oh, the tragedy!

Ivanka Trump used personal account for emails about government business

https://www.cnn.com/2018/11/19/politics/ivanka-trump-personal-email-account/index.html

Meh. Big nothing burger.

You’d be surprised how many officials do this.