BREAKING: Michael Wolff, who interviewed Epstein: Jeffrey Epstein once dug into his safe to take out photos of Donald Trump posing with topless girls on his lap… “There were specifically three photos that I remember—and this is now almost 10 years ago—but the three that I remember are two in which topless young women, and I don’t know the ages of these women, but they are young, are sitting in Trump’s lap. And this is outside Jeffrey Epstein’s house in Palm Beach, around the swimming pool.” “In the third picture, he’s wearing light pants and there’s a stain on the front of his trousers. And the girls—three, four, four or five as I remember—are pointing at the stain and laughing. And that is what I remember.”
BREAKING: Michael Wolff, who interviewed Epstein: Jeffrey Epstein once dug into his safe to take out photos of Donald Trump posing with topless girls on his lap… “There were specifically three photos that I remember—and this is now almost 10 years ago—but the three that I remember are two in which topless young women, and I don’t know the ages of these women, but they are young, are sitting in Trump’s lap. And this is outside Jeffrey Epstein’s house in Palm Beach, around the swimming pool.” “In the third picture, he’s wearing light pants and there’s a stain on the front of his trousers. And the girls—three, four, four or five as I remember—are pointing at the stain and laughing. And that is what I remember.”
Not that it'll make much of a difference on here but the Trump/Letitia James stuff bothers me & it shouldn't be partisan. James pursued a civil suit against Trump. It got through pleading, which means it had the facts to go to trial. Trump was found liable &, on appeal, the penalty was deemed excessive, which is somewhat common if a judge thinks the jury went too far in its awarding of damages. That doesn't erase liability. A court convicted & upheld liability.
So Trump looked bad & wants to get back at James. He tells Erik Siebert, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of VA, to file civil suit against James. Siebert tells Trump they cannot overcome pleading -- i.e. they do not have the facts to go to trial, let alone convict. Trump fires Siebert and replaces him with someone with no prosecutorial experience. Trump's replacement, Lindsey Hannigan, is an insurance attorney & was sworn into the role on September 22nd. She quickly calls for a grand jury. Note the distinction. There are still not enough facts to pursue a civil suit. Grand juries can, famously, "indict a ham sandwich." Very simply, grand juries are one sided. The prosecutor presents their case one-sided. The jury finds for probable cause. This is a low standard. So Trump gets the headline & everyone thinks it's the same as what happens to him, that James is guilty/liable, etc. It's not the same at all. It's incredibly frustrating and downright insulting.
I don't want to get into the back and forth of going after political opponents. If you are a Trump fan, my point is that he fired an attorney for doing their job to circumvent the legal process to get a desired result/headline disconnected from actual evidence. It should anger everyone, followers + non-followers, that he's willing to fire someone like Siebert who did nothing wrong. Even if you hate James, or whatever, he fired Siebert and put in Hannigan because he needed someone without the morals to seek a grand jury indictment. This is concerning and the way it's framed in a partisan manner isn't helpful. You shouldn't be celebrating or condemning the indictment based on political party. If James committed fraud, take her to court. Don't fire your attorney and replace them with someone willing to get a meaningless headline for you. Siebert should never have lost his job for doing it correctly. You can't just switch up lawyers to change legal outcomes.
👆laughable. takes some kind of ignorance not to acknowledge Trumps greatness at this point. He is steamrolling right through you.
And to all of those who fantasize about America becoming Sharia Law or Jewish Law or any other nonsense, the law of this land is, and will always be, Smith n Wesson. take your show to Eu but this is your reality here. on the hip in Florida, which is why we don’t cave to BLM Law. they run to California
Do we have the posts from Megan Kelly when she called out radically inflating property values to secure loans, while wildly undervaluing the same properties in the same years for the purposes of determination of tax liability?
"The hotel is sold out every night, at a HUGELY high rack rate!"
"The hotel is half empty every night, we're barely scraping by!"
Do we have the posts from Megan Kelly when she called out radically inflating property values to secure loans, while wildly undervaluing the same properties in the same years for the purposes of determination of tax liability?
"The hotel is sold out every night, at a HUGELY high rack rate!"
"The hotel is half empty every night, we're barely scraping by!"
Everyone overvalues their own properties for loans and tries to pay as little tax as possible. Do you blame him? No bank said they were harmed - not at all!
Do we have the posts from Megan Kelly when she called out radically inflating property values to secure loans, while wildly undervaluing the same properties in the same years for the purposes of determination of tax liability?
"The hotel is sold out every night, at a HUGELY high rack rate!"
"The hotel is half empty every night, we're barely scraping by!"
Everyone overvalues their own properties for loans and tries to pay as little tax as possible. Do you blame him? No bank said they were harmed - not at all!
Everyone commits the same crime does not mean that it is not a crime. While the amount of the judgment might have been excessive, Trump got slam dunked in that case.
He's a career criminal.
Does everyone also pilfer a kids' cancer charity? Or start a sham university?
Everyone overvalues their own properties for loans and tries to pay as little tax as possible. Do you blame him? No bank said they were harmed - not at all!
Everyone commits the same crime does not mean that it is not a crime. While the amount of the judgment might have been excessive, Trump got slam dunked in that case.
He's a career criminal.
Does everyone also pilfer a kids' cancer charity? Or start a sham university?
The president and New York’s attorney general accused each other of real estate fraud. But the sum involved in her case is $18,933, while millions were at stake in his.
Not that it'll make much of a difference on here but the Trump/Letitia James stuff bothers me & it shouldn't be partisan. James pursued a civil suit against Trump. It got through pleading, which means it had the facts to go to trial. Trump was found liable &, on appeal, the penalty was deemed excessive, which is somewhat common if a judge thinks the jury went too far in its awarding of damages. That doesn't erase liability. A court convicted & upheld liability.
So Trump looked bad & wants to get back at James. He tells Erik Siebert, the US Attorney for the Eastern District of VA, to file civil suit against James. Siebert tells Trump they cannot overcome pleading -- i.e. they do not have the facts to go to trial, let alone convict. Trump fires Siebert and replaces him with someone with no prosecutorial experience. Trump's replacement, Lindsey Hannigan, is an insurance attorney & was sworn into the role on September 22nd. She quickly calls for a grand jury. Note the distinction. There are still not enough facts to pursue a civil suit. Grand juries can, famously, "indict a ham sandwich." Very simply, grand juries are one sided. The prosecutor presents their case one-sided. The jury finds for probable cause. This is a low standard. So Trump gets the headline & everyone thinks it's the same as what happens to him, that James is guilty/liable, etc. It's not the same at all. It's incredibly frustrating and downright insulting.
I don't want to get into the back and forth of going after political opponents. If you are a Trump fan, my point is that he fired an attorney for doing their job to circumvent the legal process to get a desired result/headline disconnected from actual evidence. It should anger everyone, followers + non-followers, that he's willing to fire someone like Siebert who did nothing wrong. Even if you hate James, or whatever, he fired Siebert and put in Hannigan because he needed someone without the morals to seek a grand jury indictment. This is concerning and the way it's framed in a partisan manner isn't helpful. You shouldn't be celebrating or condemning the indictment based on political party. If James committed fraud, take her to court. Don't fire your attorney and replace them with someone willing to get a meaningless headline for you. Siebert should never have lost his job for doing it correctly. You can't just switch up lawyers to change legal outcomes.
Leticia James was a hunter fulfilled with power fantasies. Now she will learn Karma, be punished and hopefully turn her life around for the positive.