Joshua Cheptegei is SUSPICIOUS

So what have you been drinking?

Armstronglivs wrote:

BOHlCA wrote:

3.40 a.m. in New Zealand. Get off the bottle, moron.

Everybody knows you know nothing about elite training and performance.

Another fail by you.

So what have you been drinking?

Go to bed you degenerate drunk.

The discussion moved on, but you said "this thread is about ..."

I continue to be amazed at the density of posts like this that is able to pack so many lies in so few sentences.

It's getting old now because you are unoriginally repeating the same lies that have already been corrected.

Just to list the lies:

- The 3000m record was never my goalpoast; for that matter, neither is winning the 3000m

- I never said "he had a very good chance of beating a "soft world record"

- I never said that Komen's 3000m record was "soft"

- I never said that "he was likely capable of 7.11"

- 7:11.32 is the VDOT equivalent of his 10000m record, not the 5000m

- I never said 3:37 for a 1500m was preparation for wr pace

- Cheptegei's objective is training for the Olympics

That's 7 strikes against you.

And the 8th strike:

- I did not tell you what "modern training" can do

It is unlikely Lydiard would have ever entertained a WR attempt, because Lydiard's athletes were not fit enough until after all the training phases were complete, when they were finally reaching their peak.

There is no value claiming Cheptegei failed a training standard he did not attempt.

And at this point, it is sad, and borderline pathetic, to see your awkward attempt to include the word "doping", as if you just remembered that you forgot to say it.

And so the goal posts keep forever moving. That's what you do when your arguments all fail. Your lies are truly spectacular.

BOHlCA wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So what have you been drinking?

Go to bed you degenerate drunk.

I love feeble ripostes like that. It shows your wits are unable to muster anything better than a belch.

- "Cheptegei's objective is training for the Olympics". (quote)

Cheptegei's training objective is the Olympics - he talks to you about this does he? And you know for a fact he has no other objectives? So why would he publicly announce an attempt on the 3k wr if that too was not also an objective? What does the word "objective" mean, I wonder. Nothing in your mouth. Nothing meaningful ever issues from that orifice. Quick - move those goal posts again: "I never said"..."those are your words" ... "modern training requires" ... ad nauseam.

On the other hand, if you want to substitute "doping cycle" (aimed to peak at the Olympics) for "training objectives", there I might agree with you.

There is absolutely no chance to "win" a discussion with someone like Armstronglivs, rekrunner. He has shown this terrible attitude too often in this forum.

Are you a real person or a random meme generator?

One of my goalposts that hasn't moved for years, but instead is gathering dust, is determining if there is a basis in reality for your ideas. Now we can add alleged moving goalposts, my alleged failed arguments, and my alleged lies to that list.

You keep constructing new goalposts to avoid this one.

I'm sure he has many objectives for the year. He even stated several objectives for the 3000m race.

This leads to my second immobile goalpost: modern training -- a 3000m race at this point in the season is good training for the Olympics.

I wouldn't want to do anything that lacks an established basis in reality.

"I wouldn't want to do anything that lacks an established basis in reality".[/quote]

POTD

55554 wrote:

There is absolutely no chance to "win" a discussion with someone like Armstronglivs, rekrunner. He has shown this terrible attitude too often in this forum.

Whereas the unrelenting denial offered by the board's chief doping apologist is not such a "terrible attitude" to you? Course not.

What is a doping apologist? In many threads you have shown to be completely incapable to admit when proved to be wrong. Terrible attitude.

And, nobody denies doping in top class sports, Armstrong. But to pretend to know who does and who don't also is some terribel - or in this case more some stupid - attitude.

Armstronglivs wrote:

BOHlCA wrote:

Go to bed you degenerate drunk.

I love feeble ripostes like that. It shows your wits are unable to muster anything better than a belch.

Your daily insults show that your wits are unable to muster anything better than a fart.

And it's fun to watch you displaying your ignorance day in and day out.

Keep up the good work.

Armstronglivs wrote:

- "Cheptegei's objective is training for the Olympics". (quote)

Cheptegei's training objective is the Olympics - he talks to you about this does he? And you know for a fact he has no other objectives? So why would he publicly announce an attempt on the 3k wr if that too was not also an objective? What does the word "objective" mean, I wonder. Nothing in your mouth. Nothing meaningful ever issues from that orifice. Quick - move those goal posts again: "I never said"..."those are your words" ... "modern training requires" ... ad nauseam.

You dishonest mental midget, Cheptegei "announced" that he didn't think he was able to run 7:20, that that time was too strong for him.

Keep ignoring this fact that has been presented to you several times. You sound like the dishonest trumpers you attack so often, making up fake news.

Armstronglivs wrote:

On the other hand, if you want to substitute "doping cycle" (aimed to peak at the Olympics) for "training objectives", there I might agree with you.

Were Snell, Elliott, Walker, etc. also doping instead of training for the Olympics, you hypocritical turd?

55554 wrote:

What is a doping apologist? In many threads you have shown to be completely incapable to admit when proved to be wrong. Terrible attitude.

+1

I must be a doping apologist because I like to point out that nobody here knows anything about endocrinology or thermodynamics.

So all of the PED talk is based on hearsay and bad science.

55554 wrote:

There is absolutely no chance to "win" a discussion with someone like Armstronglivs, rekrunner. He has shown this terrible attitude too often in this forum.

This is true.

There is no point arguing with a stubborn child.