Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Oh Riley? wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Yes. Every citizen of voting age should have an equal say.

Felons?

Mentally handicapped?

Those with dementia?

Yes.

Felons who have completed their sentences and paid their debt to society should have their voting rights restored. It's called "forgiveness".

As for mental issues, we certainly don't want anyone to go around denying voting rights because someone has a mental problem. These are medical issues that can often be controlled with medication. It's a slippery slope when you decide who is allowed to vote because they sought treatment for a particular illness.

As I said before, every citizen of voting age should have an equal say in our government. That's what the Constitution says and I believe it is right and just.

You apparently want to deny voting rights to people because you think you are better than they are. But your life experience is no move valid than anyone else's.

I used to be where you are. I used to think there should be some qualification beyond citizenship and age. But as I got older and wiser I realized that this idea is just a form of bigotry.

Immature Trump can’t take heat from Acosta so he bars him - very tough guy he is indeed.

Trump didn’t even have the guts and decency to fire Sessions in person - instead he send in the COS....tiny is also soft

Trump looking at fat boy Christie as potential pick for AG. I don’t know why people were thinking Graham.. I keep telling you all, Graham is not in this to be Trump’s bit$h. He’s either going to be president or trying to run the show like Cheney did indirectly with Bush.

Agree or Disagree wrote:

agip wrote:

stop making stuff up. Try to be honest and virtuous, despite your politics.

You'll have less fun but feel cleaner.

Do you agree with the actions of democrats during the Kavanaugh episode?

dems made some bad calls, sure. But not all bad calls.

My point is that this myth about feinstein the Rs fabricated is wrong.

not that trumpers care about truth, obviously.

I disagree that it's racist, but I understand where you are coming from.

Sometimes in an argument, conservatives won't listen if they think you are being (in their mind) "too politically correct". The idea is to persuade using their native tongue. Surely, using the term "illegal alien" isn't going too far.

After all, even mainstream news outlets used the term until fairly recently. It was only five years ago that the AP Style Book was updated to stop using it.

Oh Riley? wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Yes. Every citizen of voting age should have an equal say.

Felons?

Mentally handicapped?

Those with dementia?

Trump is all three. He was allowed to vote.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Reality Bitez wrote:

There is nothing wrong with a new SCOTUS nominee as long as the democrats don't pull something as dipicable as they tried to do with Kavanaugh.

That was truly sickening.

As long as Feinstein doesn't hold onto letters in secret until the 11th hour, we should be fine. The Supreme Court will be a 6-3 conservative majority after Trump's 2020 reelection. The libs will be triggered as never before, just wait.

You mean that letter that Feinstein sent to the FBI for review long before she released it? The letter the White House knew about and decided to sit on and not release it because it would damage their candidate? That letter.

Trollminator wrote:

Immature Trump can’t take heat from Acosta so he bars him - very tough guy he is indeed.

There was a problem and Trump eliminated it without conflict. Problem?

My life experience is absolutely more valid than some people's. If you want to debate that they should have voting rights equal to mine, that's another issue. But there is no denying that there are some people who are ill informed on the issues and/or do not have the mental capacity to form an informed opinion and should not be able to vote. There is no debating that.

Trollminator wrote:

Trump looking at fat boy Christie as potential pick for AG. I don’t know why people were thinking Graham.. I keep telling you all, Graham is not in this to be Trump’s bit$h. He’s either going to be president or trying to run the show like Cheney did indirectly with Bush.

You seem to call people a lot of names. Are you over 12 years of age.

agip wrote:

Agree or Disagree wrote:

Do you agree with the actions of democrats during the Kavanaugh episode?

dems made some bad calls, sure. But not all bad calls.

My point is that this myth about feinstein the Rs fabricated is wrong.

not that trumpers care about truth, obviously.

Bullsh*t.

What bad calls did any democrats make? You can't even name one.

Guiness wrote:

Hirsch wrote:

I think that is the direction the US is going. So here is my question. It is a serious question, not in jest. How much blood are you willing to shed from your own personal supply, from those of your children, and those of other people's children? Because you know as well as I do that the effort to gerrymander and suppress the shamocracy will lead to open conflict. Will you personally bear arms against your neighbor?

I'll give a pint. You?

I don't think Hirsch is asking only about showing up to donate blood. He is asking how many people you are willing to kill to defend your new state.

Fat hurts wrote:

Stop It! wrote:

Stop with the name-calling. They are "undocumented immigrants."

Using the term "illegal aliens" is ignorant and racist.

I disagree that it's racist, but I understand where you are coming from.

Sometimes in an argument, conservatives won't listen if they think you are being (in their mind) "too politically correct". The idea is to persuade using their native tongue. Surely, using the term "illegal alien" isn't going too far.

After all, even mainstream news outlets used the term until fairly recently. It was only five years ago that the AP Style Book was updated to stop using it.

It is absolutely racist.

Do you think using the N-word is still okay? Whites only stopped (sort of) using that term a few years ago too.

Stop It! wrote:

It is absolutely racist.

Do you think using the N-word is still okay? Whites only stopped (sort of) using that term a few years ago too.

New acting AG Matthew Whitaker defended man’s right to call LGBTQ people the ‘gaystapo’ and ‘the enemy’ as ‘religious beliefs’

Stop It! wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I disagree that it's racist, but I understand where you are coming from.

Sometimes in an argument, conservatives won't listen if they think you are being (in their mind) "too politically correct". The idea is to persuade using their native tongue. Surely, using the term "illegal alien" isn't going too far.

After all, even mainstream news outlets used the term until fairly recently. It was only five years ago that the AP Style Book was updated to stop using it.

It is absolutely racist.

Do you think using the N-word is still okay? Whites only stopped (sort of) using that term a few years ago too.

i agree.

it is racist.

Me Likey wrote:

Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:

lol! And he typed that without a hint of irony.

(every single day, there are, literally, 1000's of examples of conservatives acting uncivil and certainly immature, on the internet alone [and plenty of other less anonymous places too. But they thrive in the anonymous settings because.....they are cowards]. And then you have your president: How immature and uncivil as that A-hole??? He constantly acts like a 3 year old having a tantrum, or an insecure middle schooler trying to bully kids. He has 1000x less class than Obama.

President Trump is an incredibly dishonest, delusional, deplorable, despicable, incompetent jerk, and you know it. It's much of the reason WHY you like him! You LIKE his lack of class. You LIKE his dishonesty. You LIKE his racism.

It's terribly sad, but true.)

^This one is my favorite Flagpole alias.

The "angry" one. Grrrrr.

Nope. Not me. I am never angry. I just see what is right and wrong. Think Mr. Spock (not Dr. Spock) and you have an idea.

WEJO, DO AN IP CHECK, AND IF I LIE, BAN ME FOR LIFE!!!!!!!

This is exactly correct.

Trollminator wrote:

Trump looking at fat boy Christie as potential pick for AG. I don’t know why people were thinking Graham.. I keep telling you all, Graham is not in this to be Trump’s bit$h. He’s either going to be president or trying to run the show like Cheney did indirectly with Bush.

I agree with you about Graham. He has said many times he is not interested in the AG position. It will surprise me if he takes that job.

Chris Christie would be an interesting pick for Trump to make as AG. While you can never know exactly what someone is really thinking or what they will do when in a certain situation, Christie has been very critical of Trump in a lot of ways and complimentary of how the Mueller investigation has gone.

I sure hope that anyone who takes that AG job either on a temporary basis or full time realizes they could end up behind bars if they just do what Trump tells them to do.

Sitter Trump wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

As long as Feinstein doesn't hold onto letters in secret until the 11th hour, we should be fine. The Supreme Court will be a 6-3 conservative majority after Trump's 2020 reelection. The libs will be triggered as never before, just wait.

You mean that letter that Feinstein sent to the FBI for review long before she released it? The letter the White House knew about and decided to sit on and not release it because it would damage their candidate? That letter.

Rigged is not armed with knowledge. He frequently spouts right-wing conspiracy theories, flat our falsehoods, and other nonsense. It's one thing to get an election prediction wrong (which in my case I still might be right about the 2016 election if Conspiracy is proven -- which I say will). It is still another to spout incorrect facts and theories as if they are true. With an election, you can't control the outcome. With facts, you can at least investigate to see if what you are spewing is true. Rigged either has no interest in the facts or no ability to discover what is true and not true. In short, typical Trump supporter.