So sad the you think others have been misled. Please tell me you have not donated money to the Cheeto?
The insurrection involves more than just the events of 1/6 thus the long list of people being investigated. There is no 'they' in this equation just people doing their jobs.
My dislike of Trump is long standing and fully justified.
Look at you.
Donald tinyhands;
Cheetoh,
1/6 is an insurrection.
You have no thoughts of your own, even the words you use have come straight from the propagandists
Yes, I disrespect a man that has earned mine and many others disrespect - long before he ever held office.
Look at your reaching to the far ends of the internet for ridiculously lame sources in a pathetic attempt to show the libs - who aren't actually libs just reasonable people unwilling to accept a career/life long grifter as a leader of this country
Cheeto (no h) will certainly be a a historic figure in the same vain as Nixon.
So sad the you think others have been misled. Please tell me you have not donated money to the Cheeto?
The insurrection involves more than just the events of 1/6 thus the long list of people being investigated. There is no 'they' in this equation just people doing their jobs.
My dislike of Trump is long standing and fully justified.
Look at you.
Donald tinyhands;
Cheetoh,
1/6 is an insurrection.
You have no thoughts of your own, even the words you use have come straight from the propagandists
BTW did you get invited to this meeting of Minds, Manboobs and love handles?
Two armed men evidently is classified as a coup attempt by the left, which must mean the summer of love was the largest coup attempt in the history of mankind, as there were far more guns, far more damage, etc.
Dude 1967 was a long time ago. Lot has happened since then. Try to keep up.
You have no thoughts of your own, even the words you use have come straight from the propagandists
Yes, I disrespect a man that has earned mine and many others disrespect - long before he ever held office.
Look at your reaching to the far ends of the internet for ridiculously lame sources in a pathetic attempt to show the libs - who aren't actually libs just reasonable people unwilling to accept a career/life long grifter as a leader of this country
Cheeto (no h) will certainly be a a historic figure in the same vain as Nixon.
Damn right they should. If you are still supporting Trump after all of this, you don't value this country.
I am not supporting Trump
blah blah blah
Think
You and Adult both claim you don't support Trump, while posting literally thousands of messages in support of Trump and/or his interests.
Outside of saying you don't support him, I've yet to see one post where either one of you gives a reason why you don't support him. Whenever you are asked to address this you do the typical GOP move of "oh, look, a squirrel." That crap works on Trumpies. Doesn't work on your average person.
You and Adult both claim you don't support Trump, while posting literally thousands of messages in support of Trump and/or his interests.
Outside of saying you don't support him, I've yet to see one post where either one of you gives a reason why you don't support him. Whenever you are asked to address this you do the typical GOP move of "oh, look, a squirrel." That crap works on Trumpies. Doesn't work on your average person.
Being against what the FBI is doing to Trump and others does not mean support for Trump.
It appears that Trump has fully abandoned the FBI deep state planted documents defense in favor of the 5 year old... "Mine, Mine, Mine!" defense
Let's see how this turns out for him.
Another defense that may have gone the wayside is the de-classification defense. It's certainly looking weaker and weaker. In a court filing on 9/13/22, the Feds (finally) started pushing back on that one:
"Plaintiff’s attempts to change the subject by holding out the possibility that he could have declassified some of the seized records and/or that he could have designated them as “personal” records, D.E. 84 at 11-15, fare no better. As already noted, Plaintiff has now filed multiple lengthy submissions with the Court that stop short of asserting that he in fact took any of these actions with respect to any of the seized records, including those at issue in the stay motion. In light of the classification markings, official cover sheets, and other indicia of classification attendant to these materials, see, e.g., D.E. 48-1, Attachment F, such possibilities should not be given weight absent Plaintiff’s putting forward competent evidence."
Trump's lawyers are obviously having problems finding any evidence that he ever de-classified the documents at issue. They can't find any written evidence, and it looks like they can't find anyone -- INCLUDING Trump -- willing to submit a sworn affidavit that Trump ever something like "all these documents are hereby declassified." That defense is not looking good. Some posters in this thread may be going home devastated on that, rather soon.
Yes, I disrespect a man that has earned mine and many others disrespect - long before he ever held office.
Look at your reaching to the far ends of the internet for ridiculously lame sources in a pathetic attempt to show the libs - who aren't actually libs just reasonable people unwilling to accept a career/life long grifter as a leader of this country
Cheeto (no h) will certainly be a a historic figure in the same vain as Nixon.
What did Nixon do?
Playing dumb? Your 'go to' right after playing the victim.
Trump's lawyers are obviously having problems finding any evidence that he ever de-classified the documents at issue. They can't find any written evidence, and it looks like they can't find anyone -- INCLUDING Trump -- willing to submit a sworn affidavit that Trump ever something like "all these documents are hereby declassified." That defense is not looking good. Some posters in this thread may be going home devastated on that, rather soon.
Periodic reprise of what others have said: For the laws of which Donald Trump is potentially accused, whether a document was classified, never classified, or declassified macht nichts. Harm to the US/aid to an enemy, obstruction, and unlawful taking/keeping of government property...do not depend on any document's classified (or not) status.
Sky News host Andrew Bolt says there have been two developments in the media today contributing to distrust from the public.He said one was the “bombshell an...
So pretend-judge Cannon rules that DOJ must be wrong or lying about how delaying the criminal probe into Trump's sloppy and/or treasonous handling of the documents could possibly be a national security risk. She knows better, because she trusts Trump and his lawyers over the entire FBI and DOJ. Trump and his lawyers would never lie about this stuff, would they?
US District Judge Aileen Cannon also rejected the Justice Department's bid to resume its criminal investigation into classified documents seized at Mar-a-Lago last month.
The law clearly defines how classified documents are to be treated and stored and who has access to them (after all, Trump is being investigated for violating those laws). Ordering the FBI to hand over these classified documents (which ARE classified whether the judge thinks the FBI is lying or not) would not be in compliance with the law, which is tantamount to the judge ordering the FBI to commit a felony.
(Great point. It's not mine, I copied it from a commenter on DailyKos.)
The law clearly defines how classified documents are to be treated and stored and who has access to them (after all, Trump is being investigated for violating those laws). Ordering the FBI to hand over these classified documents (which ARE classified whether the judge thinks the FBI is lying or not) would not be in compliance with the law, which is tantamount to the judge ordering the FBI to commit a felony.
(Great point. It's not mine, I copied it from a commenter on DailyKos.)
best description I've seen of all this is that this judge is a chicken and wants a court above her to make all the necessary decisions that will go against trump. She sounds like a true believer and a bad judge.
