Check please wrote:
Pointing Out the REALLY Obvious wrote:
No offense, but nobody should ever have unchecked power. Unchecked power is for totalitarian states.
Perhaps you think that the US should be a totalitarian state?
If the majority of voters think so then yes. Why not?
Something called the United States Constitution. Ever heard of it?
Fat hurts wrote:
already voted wrote:
One cannot be an unchecked dictator and support the second amendment of the US Constitution.
Those would be contradictory characteristics.
Every fascist dictator in history banned guns.
Trump might try. He's already talked about it.
But no president has commanded an army as powerful as ours. The armed citizenry is no match in both hardware and logistics. People who think the second amendment is a check on tyranny are fooling themselves.
No, he will not. This is a certainty that I already pointed out to you thousands of posts ago.
Trump is a complete 100% pure unadulterated coward. There is zero chance that he would ever try something that would put him at risk of physical harm. You may think that his stupidity may trump his cowardice here in that he may not understand the risk to his own physical well being in trying to take over. But Trump has a certain reptilian survival instinct that, regardless of how stupid he is, will save him from anything that might result in pain above and beyond a paper cut.
Pointing Out the REALLY Obvious wrote:
But Trump has a certain reptilian survival instinct that, regardless of how stupid he is, will save him from anything that might result in pain above and beyond a paper cut.
That is pure BS. Trump is a coward. He prefers to kill himself to become a martyr to his fans—he is gaining yuge weight every month, and he has bigly upped his dosage of orange spray paint on his face—, rather than survive and face future damage to the false facade he still hides behind. As only Trumpette said the other day, she did not care if Trump spouted a 3rd dick up there; she would still support him. A 3rd dick? When did Trumpers start believing Trump already had a 2nd dick?
https://newsbout.com/id/18480842816Pointing Out the REALLY Obvious wrote:
No, he will not. This is a certainty that I already pointed out to you thousands of posts ago.
Trump is a complete 100% pure unadulterated coward. There is zero chance that he would ever try something that would put him at risk of physical harm. You may think that his stupidity may trump his cowardice here in that he may not understand the risk to his own physical well being in trying to take over. But Trump has a certain reptilian survival instinct that, regardless of how stupid he is, will save him from anything that might result in pain above and beyond a paper cut.
You sound like a hate-filled coward. Yes, you're a coward.
How do you disagree with this?...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uJ6djc12l8Deathly Trump wrote:
Pointing Out the REALLY Obvious wrote:
But Trump has a certain reptilian survival instinct that, regardless of how stupid he is, will save him from anything that might result in pain above and beyond a paper cut.
That is pure BS. Trump is a coward. He prefers to kill himself to become a martyr to his fans—he is gaining yuge weight every month, and he has bigly upped his dosage of orange spray paint on his face—, rather than survive and face future damage to the false facade he still hides behind. As only Trumpette said the other day, she did not care if Trump spouted a 3rd dick up there; she would still support him. A 3rd dick? When did Trumpers start believing Trump already had a 2nd dick?
https://newsbout.com/id/18480842816
You're both sick...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLeqfr-GFIQFat hurts wrote:
already voted wrote:
One cannot be an unchecked dictator and support the second amendment of the US Constitution.
Those would be contradictory characteristics.
Every fascist dictator in history banned guns.
Trump might try. He's already talked about it.
But no president has commanded an army as powerful as ours. The armed citizenry is no match in both hardware and logistics. People who think the second amendment is a check on tyranny are fooling themselves.
Armed rebels in the Middle East have been a massive headache for our supposedly all-powerful military.
fivethirtyeight's real-time prediction now showing Democrats with a 92% chance of winning the house. Getting better.
You need psychological help wrote:
Deathly Trump wrote:
That is pure BS. Trump is a coward. He prefers to kill himself to become a martyr to his fans—he is gaining yuge weight every month, and he has bigly upped his dosage of orange spray paint on his face—, rather than survive and face future damage to the false facade he still hides behind. As only Trumpette said the other day, she did not care if Trump spouted a 3rd dick up there; she would still support him. A 3rd dick? When did Trumpers start believing Trump already had a 2nd dick?
https://newsbout.com/id/18480842816You're both sick...
Your psychological illness will not go away until you denounce the Orange POS you worship as your deer leader.
Yeah, you debate the posted video. Truth is too much for you handle.
already voted wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Trump might try. He's already talked about it.
But no president has commanded an army as powerful as ours. The armed citizenry is no match in both hardware and logistics. People who think the second amendment is a check on tyranny are fooling themselves.
Armed rebels in the Middle East have been a massive headache for our supposedly all-powerful military.
So the armed citizenry would be just a headache. Sounds about right.
It wouldn't serve as a check on tyranny.
Noticer of things... wrote:
Yeah, you debate the posted video. Truth is too much for you handle.
Yeah, you can debate this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ3XYsUKVTcdebate this . . . wrote:
Noticer of things... wrote:
Yeah, you debate the posted video. Truth is too much for you handle.
Yeah, you can debate this video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZ3XYsUKVTc
Learn to think for yourself. If you have a point to make, use your own words.
Fat hurts wrote:
debate this . . . wrote:
Yeah, you can debate this video.
Learn to think for yourself. If you have a point to make, use your own words.
Noticer of things... failed to debate anything. No debate with him is necessary.
TheOhioState wrote:
CNN doesn't lean left. They are completely to the left. They're as bad as the New York Times.
Reality has a liberal bias.
Where is Flagpole tonight?
So. Much. Losing.
How's the Kansas experiment going? Fail.
How's that swamp draining going?
Mitt Romney just clinched his seat in the senate.
I don't think this has been talked about much, but Romney is not a reliable Trump vote.
Cruz hangs on. It's still Texas. I hate it that I was right on that one.
Democrats take the house!
The good guys have a chance now.
You know it's true... D wrote:
Pointing Out the REALLY Obvious wrote:
No, he will not. This is a certainty that I already pointed out to you thousands of posts ago.
Trump is a complete 100% pure unadulterated coward. There is zero chance that he would ever try something that would put him at risk of physical harm. You may think that his stupidity may trump his cowardice here in that he may not understand the risk to his own physical well being in trying to take over. But Trump has a certain reptilian survival instinct that, regardless of how stupid he is, will save him from anything that might result in pain above and beyond a paper cut.
You sound like a hate-filled coward. Yes, you're a coward.
How do you disagree with this?...
link
That's cute.
Stupid. Very very stupid. But cute.
Good job!