Harambe wrote:
Remember, just because you want something to be true doesn't make it true.
Critical thinking is tough on aging brains.
You're right, and that's why leftist 'intellectuals' are finally giving in that they've (and you) been played. You're intellectual idiots... and wanted something so bad to be true. Critical thinking is tough on delusional individuals.
https://www.thenation.com/article/russiagate-2018-midterms-interference/The world will have fun with this stuff for many, many years to come...
https://twitter.com/Fuctupmind/status/1056971162566250496/video/1
It’s always been about the long game. McConnell is the real leader of the GOP. He got 2 SCOTUS seats, averting real liberal sweep in the court. Can you imagine if Obama was able to appoint a judge and then Clinton? 2 left leaning judges taking over for 2 right leaning judges. McConnell would have died.
Alan
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
Reporters at The Hill get contacted by a woman who says she was offered money in exchange for accusing Mueller of being a sexual assaulter. She gave them a phone number that had been given to her by her mystery contact. When they contacted it, they received a threat in response to "drop this." They also get a call from a guy who claims he is with a company called "Surefire Intelligence" who also threatened them and admitted to dealing with this same woman. This was all reported to the special counsel.
Jack Burkman (Republican lobbyist/talk radio personality) then tweets out that he'll be revealing Robert Mueller's "sexual assault victims" on Thursday. He tells the Hill that he is bringing these women to light by coordinating with an agency called SureFire Intelligence, which is actually run by ... Jacob Wohl, an alt-right personality and former teenage wunderkind in securities fraud. Wohl claims to have no knowledge of this company, but the registration record for it is under Jacob Wohl's name and the agency's "official phone number" redirects to a voicemail box registered to Jacob's mommy. LOL!
https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1057371849439502338In other words, we have two stupid Republican operatives attempting to bribe women into making false accusations in an effort to undermine an ongoing FBI investigation.
The conservative propaganda outlet Gateway Pundit (aka Jacob Wohl's employer) is gonna run with it anyway!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/breaking-report-exclusive-documents-special-counsel-and-former-fbi-director-robert-mueller-accused-of-rape-by-very-credible-witness/It gets better! The date cited in the bogus accusation documents say Robert Mueller raped this anonymous woman on August 2, 2010 in his hotel suite on the 19th floor of the St. Regis in NYC.
Robert Mueller was documented attending jury duty in DC that day and the 19th floor of the St. Regis is an athletic club.
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
Reporters at The Hill get contacted by a woman who says she was offered money in exchange for accusing Mueller of being a sexual assaulter. She gave them a phone number that had been given to her by her mystery contact. When they contacted it, they received a threat in response to "drop this." They also get a call from a guy who claims he is with a company called "Surefire Intelligence" who also threatened them and admitted to dealing with this same woman. This was all reported to the special counsel.
Jack Burkman (Republican lobbyist/talk radio personality) then tweets out that he'll be revealing Robert Mueller's "sexual assault victims" on Thursday. He tells the Hill that he is bringing these women to light by coordinating with an agency called SureFire Intelligence, which is actually run by ... Jacob Wohl, an alt-right personality and former teenage wunderkind in securities fraud. Wohl claims to have no knowledge of this company, but the registration record for it is under Jacob Wohl's name and the agency's "official phone number" redirects to a voicemail box registered to Jacob's mommy. LOL!
https://twitter.com/JaneMayerNYer/status/1057371849439502338In other words, we have two stupid Republican operatives attempting to bribe women into making false accusations in an effort to undermine an ongoing FBI investigation.
The conservative propaganda outlet Gateway Pundit (aka Jacob Wohl's employer) is gonna run with it anyway!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/breaking-report-exclusive-documents-special-counsel-and-former-fbi-director-robert-mueller-accused-of-rape-by-very-credible-witness/It gets better! The date cited in the bogus accusation documents say Robert Mueller raped this anonymous woman on August 2, 2010 in his hotel suite on the 19th floor of the St. Regis in NYC.
Robert Mueller was documented attending jury duty in DC that day and the 19th floor of the St. Regis is an athletic club.
He should sue them fo slander.
The truth hurts wrote:
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
The conservative propaganda outlet Gateway Pundit (aka Jacob Wohl's employer) is gonna run with it anyway!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/breaking-report-exclusive-documents-special-counsel-and-former-fbi-director-robert-mueller-accused-of-rape-by-very-credible-witness/It gets better! The date cited in the bogus accusation documents say Robert Mueller raped this anonymous woman on August 2, 2010 in his hotel suite on the 19th floor of the St. Regis in NYC.
Robert Mueller was documented attending jury duty in DC that day and the 19th floor of the St. Regis is an athletic club.
He should sue them fo slander.
This serves as more than just an attempt to discredit him. It was meant to bring him to the mic and try to remove some of his objectivity aura. They are hoping he will finally say something in public, anything and then go from there
Trollminator wrote:
This serves as more than just an attempt to discredit him. It was meant to bring him to the mic and try to remove some of his objectivity aura. They are hoping he will finally say something in public, anything and then go from there
His silence does make him seem pretty bad-a$$.
Fat hurts wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
This serves as more than just an attempt to discredit him. It was meant to bring him to the mic and try to remove some of his objectivity aura. They are hoping he will finally say something in public, anything and then go from there
His silence does make him seem pretty bad-a$$.
They're messin' with the wrong guy.
What are the odds that Trump is subpoenaed? I think this is stretched out another year because Trump’s lawyers would fight it as presidents before him have.
Alan
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/31/has-robert-mueller-subpoenaed-trump-222060
Down With the FP Dude! wrote:
LL Cool J9 wrote:
THIS!!!!!! Funny how no one on the left could respond? I've fact checked it all, this dude nailed it! You poor liberals whining over and over, then comparing Texas to California, but neglecting to bring up the facts. So damn glad he won!
Truther3, well played friend! Kicked Fat Hurts and Flagpole to the curb, zero comeback on the tough facts!
Yeah, I LOVE THIS POST! Fatty and LL couldn't respond to that many facts if their lives depended on it.
Runningart2004 wrote:
What are the odds that Trump is subpoenaed? I think this is stretched out another year because Trump’s lawyers would fight it as presidents before him have.
Alan
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/31/has-robert-mueller-subpoenaed-trump-222060
Mueller's not going to pass on having a sit down with the Prez. I would expect the subpoena and, you're right, it will be vigorously challenged by the POTUS. Not sure it takes that long.
In the interim, Mueller will likely move forward on cats such as Roger Stone and Donnie Jr.
A word to the wise from Mr. Axelrod for Democrats on a number of issues:https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/30/david-axelrod-2020-democratic-candidates-trump-harris-gillibrand-bernie-castro-patrick-221951
I have to tell you, Bob Mueller was the FBI director when I was in the White House. I was in a couple of meetings with him, and I never said a word in those, frankly, because he scared the sh!t out of me. I mean, he is the portrait of rectitude. And I’ve told Democrats, 'Look, if Bob Mueller comes back and says there’s nothing there, then I’m willing to say I believe that, because I know that he’ll have been thorough in his investigation. But if he comes back with something that is dam ning, then I think Democrats have an obligation to act.'
L L wrote:
Down With the FP Dude! wrote:
Truther3, well played friend! Kicked Fat Hurts and Flagpole to the curb, zero comeback on the tough facts!
Yeah, I LOVE THIS POST! Fatty and LL couldn't respond to that many facts if their lives depended on it.
I don't see what this has to do with me. I'm not involved in the thread. Even if I was, I'm not sure what you are so hot and bothered about.
Tiny won the electoral college.
Hillary won the popular vote.
Why is that so hard?
TTH wrote:
Mueller's not going to pass on having a sit down with the Prez.
He did... a four hour sit down with DJT the day before he was appointed as special counsel.
http://softwareplusplus.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Fotolia_106996237_S-e1502807949799.jpgSome people just don't get 'it' wrote:
TTH wrote:
Mueller's not going to pass on having a sit down with the Prez.
He did... a four hour sit down with DJT the day before he was appointed as special counsel.
Fat hurts wrote:
L L wrote:
Yeah, I LOVE THIS POST! Fatty and LL couldn't respond to that many facts if their lives depended on it.
I don't see what this has to do with me. I'm not involved in the thread. Even if I was, I'm not sure what you are so hot and bothered about.
Tiny won the electoral college.
Hillary won the popular vote.
Why is that so hard?
Triggered old liberal!!!
You don't get involved in threads where you don't have the answer. Your answer is so basic and standard, but not when a rightwing poster comes back with a response like that, then it's "no, it's more involved than that", lol!
She won the popular vote by 2% old man. Trump won the electoral by a much higher percent. Do try to stay up with the facts.
California and her 4.2 million more votes is the only reason she won the popular vote, did that fact lose ya?
Triggered old man liberal gets beat again!!!
Hillary got beat in all the crucial states. That's what counts! California, one lousy liberal state does not give her the popular vote victory and the same rules apply to Donald Trump, PRESIDENT OF THE United States OF AMERICA!!!!
Good post, monkeys typing. Your honesty is awesome. Thanks
non flagpolian wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I don't see what this has to do with me. I'm not involved in the thread. Even if I was, I'm not sure what you are so hot and bothered about.
Tiny won the electoral college.
Hillary won the popular vote.
Why is that so hard?
Triggered old liberal!!!
You don't get involved in threads where you don't have the answer. Your answer is so basic and standard, but not when a rightwing poster comes back with a response like that, then it's "no, it's more involved than that", lol!
She won the popular vote by 2% old man. Trump won the electoral by a much higher percent. Do try to stay up with the facts.
California and her 4.2 million more votes is the only reason she won the popular vote, did that fact lose ya?
Triggered old man liberal gets beat again!!!
Hillary got beat in all the crucial states. That's what counts! California, one lousy liberal state does not give her the popular vote victory and the same rules apply to Donald Trump, PRESIDENT OF THE United States OF AMERICA!!!!
I think it’s very telling that some trumpers feel the need to defend his narrow victory across a number of states.
TTH wrote:
A word to the wise from Mr. Axelrod for Democrats on a number of issues:
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/30/david-axelrod-2020-democratic-candidates-trump-harris-gillibrand-bernie-castro-patrick-221951I have to tell you, Bob Mueller was the FBI director when I was in the White House. I was in a couple of meetings with him, and I never said a word in those, frankly, because he scared the sh!t out of me. I mean, he is the portrait of rectitude. And I’ve told Democrats, 'Look, if Bob Mueller comes back and says there’s nothing there, then I’m willing to say I believe that, because I know that he’ll have been thorough in his investigation. But if he comes back with something that is dam ning, then I think Democrats have an obligation to act.'
Clinton fought his subpoena for a year.
The end result was bad for the GOP because the dirt ended up just being about an affair.
Alan
non flagpolian wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I don't see what this has to do with me. I'm not involved in the thread. Even if I was, I'm not sure what you are so hot and bothered about.
Tiny won the electoral college.
Hillary won the popular vote.
Why is that so hard?
Triggered old liberal!!!
You don't get involved in threads where you don't have the answer. Your answer is so basic and standard, but not when a rightwing poster comes back with a response like that, then it's "no, it's more involved than that", lol!
She won the popular vote by 2% old man. Trump won the electoral by a much higher percent. Do try to stay up with the facts.
California and her 4.2 million more votes is the only reason she won the popular vote, did that fact lose ya?
Triggered old man liberal gets beat again!!!
Hillary got beat in all the crucial states. That's what counts! California, one lousy liberal state does not give her the popular vote victory and the same rules apply to Donald Trump, PRESIDENT OF THE United States OF AMERICA!!!!
So your argument is that California doesn't count?
Are you nine years old or something?
